Jump to content

Closing politics boards elsewhere


shoshin

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Oh for heaven’s sake. Is he coming over to your house for dinner? Is he dating your daughter? I’m all for unity as much as the next guy, but somebody has to fix the corruption in Washington. You need to break some eggs to make an omelette. 

He is a narcissistic con man who right now is trying to tear down our democracy by making false accusations about the election.

 

You want unity and to break corruption (as if his administration has done either)?  We need a viable third party and/or have those in the middle politically (like you and me I suspect) take the country back from the fringe lunatics. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Oh for heaven’s sake. Is he coming over to your house for dinner? Is he dating your daughter? I’m all for unity as much as the next guy, but somebody has to fix the corruption in Washington. You need to break some eggs to make an omelette. 

Getting Trump out is the first step. Instead of draining the swamp he learned to become Swamp Thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Oh for heaven’s sake. Is he coming over to your house for dinner? Is he dating your daughter? 


No and neither is the Zodiac Killer but I don’t want him as my president. 
 

Threatening democracy is not a way to clean up corruption. 

Edited by shoshin
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Jaraxxus said:

 

No echo chamber here.

 

:lol:

He has Congressmen threatening to try and uproot a free and fair election, all because his ego can’t take that he lost.  That should concern any American citizen.  Laugh if you want but I guess you don’t take freedom and the Constitution seriously.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:

He has Congressmen threatening to try and uproot a free and fair election, all because his ego can’t take that he lost.  That should concern any American citizen.  Laugh if you want but I guess you don’t take freedom and the Constitution seriously.

Texas AG talks about secession.

Michael Flynn advocates treason.

 

but no clearly there is nothing we should be worried about.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jaraxxus said:

 

Don't care. In fact, think a split would be beneficial, along with population transfers.

 

Didn't worry about that during the "NOT MY PRESIDENT !!!1!1!! era, though no? Or the united States of Canada/jesusland thing...

 

Hm.

You don’t care about the country.  I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/12/2020 at 3:47 PM, Big Blitz said:

 

 

I think you are over looking (amazing you are demonstrating part I rule I right it's hilarious "willfully misrepresent what your opponents say") these are tactics the WOKE (illeberal crowd) use.  

 

I know of ZERO conservatives that want anyone silenced or canceled.  I know or ZERO conservatives misrepresenting what the left argues.  I know of zero conservatives that insult you to the point you want to leave the discussion bc you see it's not worth your time.  These rules are funny and clearly triggered you bc you know he's right.   

So, you have no friends. We all knew that! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

Oh give it up with this talking point about ‘threatening democracy’. That’s just silly.


Yeah, the sitting president is suing to overturn elections with evidence that doesn’t hold up in courts and calls state legislators to convince them to send different electors and more. 
 

I’d say that’s a threat to democracy. Just because the courts, governors, and legislators held firm doesn’t mean that a potus and his supporters were no threat. 

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, shoshin said:


Yeah, the sitting president is suing to overturn elections with evidence that doesn’t hold up in courts and calls state legislators to convince them to send different electors and more. 
 

I’d say that’s a threat to democracy. Just because the courts, governors, and legislators held firm doesn’t mean that a potus and his supporters were no threat. 

And all of this after the Democrats boycotted his inauguration, called him illegitimate, impeached him, tore up his State of the Union address, trashed his nominees, told Americans he was a traitor......need I go on? Come on Man! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

And all of this after the Democrats boycotted his inauguration, called him illegitimate, impeached him, tore up his State of the Union address, trashed his nominees, told Americans he was a traitor......need I go on? Come on Man! 

 

I think there were very few Democrats who boycotted his inauguration or called him illegitimate.  Most of their complaints were that he lost the majority vote.  At least they had a rational based on democratic norms for those positions.  As far as him being impeached, well if he hadn't used taxpayer funds to extort an ally, that wouldn't have happened.  The rest just stinks of politics and whining, which Trump and the Trumptards excel at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SoCal Deek said:

And all of this after the Democrats boycotted his inauguration, called him illegitimate, impeached him, tore up his State of the Union address, trashed his nominees, told Americans he was a traitor......need I go on? Come on Man! 

 

Heaping bad on bad is not good. The sitting POTUS has actively tried to overturn an election because he lost. 

 

Call out all the BS, not just some of it. To quote you, "Come on Man!" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, shoshin said:

 

Heaping bad on bad is not good. The sitting POTUS has actively tried to overturn an election because he lost. 

 

Call out all the BS, not just some of it. To quote you, "Come on Man!" 

The last sitting President actually spied on the current sitting President...come on man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, shoshin said:

 

And the current president's actions? 

He’s able to offer up any challenges he wants up until the process says not. I work in a public bid arena. Bidders challenge bids all the time. But....when time is up...that’s it. Likewise, Hilary shouldn’t have been going around saying Trump was illegitimate for the last four years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

He’s able to offer up any challenges he wants up until the process says not. I work in a public bid arena. Bidders challenge bids all the time. But....when time is up...that’s it. Likewise, Hilary shouldn’t have been going around saying Trump was illegitimate for the last four years. 

 

Whataboutism.

 

So you supported the Russia investigation then? It was allowed after all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...