Jump to content

Saints to start Taysom Hill over Jameis Winston


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, teef said:

fair enough.  i just think allen had a different learning curve than others for a number of reasons.  we all knew his success wouldn't likely be immediate.  

Not with the line & receivers they started him with.  I just hated the conservative play calling through McD's first three seasons, and we know his eye for offensive talent (i.e. Peterman)......😉😜

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 250
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Jameis Winston when he heard the news Brees is out for awhile.   Jameis WInston watching Taysom Hill taking 1st team reps.  

FYI if you play fantasy on ESPN, you can still use taysom hill in the TE spot this week 

 

 

6 hours ago, NoSaint said:


it’s not his fault but certainly to his advantage as it takes a great deal of pressure off

 

 

Well, yeah, but that's kind of what defenses are supposed to do. Using the defense to attack Taysom Hill is ridiculous.

 

If you want to attack him, do it for his performance, not because some other group of guys is doing their job well. Did you attack Josh Allen last year when the defense played well? People did, and it made no more sense then.

 

Hill played really well. The offense scored 24 points. There should be mostly good things to say about that game. Sure, as I said, he's still got a huge amount to prove. But so far so very good.

 

 

6 hours ago, teef said:

also reminds me what a certain someone here does with the coaching staff when he doesn't get what he wants.

 

 

Yup. Precisely. But it's like talking ... well, this isn't much of a metaphor but it's like talking to someone who doesn't get it.

Edited by Thurman#1
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

That screen was text book on the late decision making. Those red flags will likely continue. 

 

he is fun to watch against a struggling team and backed by that defense... but boy would it go south in a shootout. 

On 11/24/2020 at 5:37 PM, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

 

 

Well, yeah, but that's kind of what defenses are supposed to do. Using the defense to attack Taysom Hill is ridiculous.

 

If you want to attack him, do it for his performance, not because some other group of guys is doing their job well. Did you attack Josh Allen last year when the defense played well? People did, and it made no more sense then.


If that’s an attack, pillow fights must be terrifying.

 

saying that he wasn’t asked to do a lot and it was low pressure isn’t an attack. It’s just context.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NoSaint said:


 

you knew he’d be asked to do very little but... 

 

this game might not cross 100 total combined passing yards 😂

 

I can't believe this isn't being nationally televised---a game with zero QBs!!

 

A must see

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Soooooo tentative. I get taking no risks in a game like this but at some point got to pull the trigger. 

 

its not like Denver is going to start racking up touchdowns and the leads wide enough to actually test taysom a bit without consequences.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NoSaint said:

Soooooo tentative. I get taking no risks in a game like this but at some point got to pull the trigger. 

 

its not like Denver is going to start racking up touchdowns and the leads wide enough to actually test taysom a bit without consequences.

No way. Win the game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...