Jump to content

Banned usernames


SDS

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Rob's House said:

 

This is just another example of you guys intentionally misrepresenting someone's words so as to feign indignation on the premise that their statement conveyed something other than its plain and obvious meaning. It's so typical.

 

 

The feigned indignation will be the eventual ruin of this place. Once the authorities buy it, there's no going back. Sad.

Edited by CarpetCrawler
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:


I’ll return to address this, because you’re defaming me, which I was alerted to because you quoted my content.  That’s a total mischaracterization of what I said, and the actions you took.
 

Another poster, who claims to be a lawyer, was making a defense of a pedophile.  Lawyering for pedophiles.

 

The way lawyers are described in the English language are predicate.

 

Constitutional lawyer.  Corporate lawyer.  Family lawyer.  Divorce lawyer.  Immigration lawyer.  Personal injury lawyer.  Bankruptcy lawyer.  Estate planning lawyer.  Criminal lawyer.

 

Pedophile lawyer.

 

I made it quite clear in that thread that I was not naming him a pedophile, stating so directly, including directly to him, many times; even going so far as to defend him from people who actually called him a pedophile.

 

The English language and clear context of that thread are evidence of this.


The assertion that this somehow jeopardized SDS, and this site, legally is absurd.

 

You acted on bias, ignored context and language, didn’t give me the opportunity to address any of it, and then ham handedly threatened me with a perma-ban, saying I was on a short leash.

 

Let’s stick to facts, shall we?


As to me saying decisions like the ones being made should hurt?

 

They should.  This board is Scott’s property, but he’s choosing to alienate a large portion of the community he claims to want to foster.  Those people should remember this, and treat him accordingly.

 

 


ummm is he a “pedophile lawyer” as you define it???  Or is that made up as well?

2 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:


He’s the owner of the site, and the sole individual responsible for policies and decisions which have targeted conservatives and their view points.  He is the sole proprietor.  Of course it’s about him personally.  He personally made the decisions.

 

Conservatives should let people know exactly  how Scott runs his business.


god some people love to be persecuted.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

Because it shows to all the only reason you are here.  

What reason is that? To make fun of pussies?  
 

Not everyone is as tough as chef Jim and survived the dangers of culinary life! 😂😂😂
 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Q-baby! said:

What reason is that? To make fun of pussies?  
 

Not everyone is as tough as chef Jim and survived the dangers of culinary life! 😂😂😂
 

 

 

Really?  Is that why you feel you're here.  You need another hobby. This one is kind of sad.

 

And I would be surprised if you lasted a week in a professional kitchen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

 

Hoax.  What do you call a priest who ministers to pedophiles?  A priest who ministers to pedophiles.  What do you call a priest who is a pedophile?  A pedophile priest.  

 

And, for what it’s worth, I have never, in my decades in this profession, heard the phrase “pedophile lawyer.”  Not once.  

 

Have a nice day, hoaxer. 

Clearly he wasn't accusing you. Now that we got that out of the way, if you're looking for work, which based on how much you've posted since March you must be. Here's a former Dem candidate you might be able to help.

 

 

😉

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LB3 said:

Clearly he wasn't accusing you. Now that we got that out of the way, if you're looking for work, which based on how much you've posted since March you must be. Here's a former Dem candidate you might be able to help.

 

 

😉

Hoax. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...