stuckincincy Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 I don't know - I haven't considered picks for the Bills at that high spot. Any thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 DeMarcus Ware? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Dr Phil because a lot of us will need therapy if that happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RVJ Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 I might get crucified for saying this. Never mind Im not going to say it. Do you think that Matt Jones will be drafted in the bottom of round 1 or early 2nd. Are am I way off base. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloRebound Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 I don't think the Clements deal would happen unless the Henry for Barber deal was real. At #9, I would guess a CB or pass rusher based on some of the player rankings out there and who will be available at #9. I guess Matt Jones could even be a possibility here also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 This is not a criticism, but does anyone know what "market value" for the #9 pick is? Is it significantly lower than what we'd be paying Nate? I just can't see it being worth it investing all that money in an unproven guy if the figures are anywhere NEAR close. I think NC is one worth paying for. This is all of course assuming the Skins are even interested. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailog80 Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 I don't think the Clements deal would happen unless the Henry for Barber deal was real. At #9, I would guess a CB or pass rusher based on some of the player rankings out there and who will be available at #9. I guess Matt Jones could even be a possibility here also. 308767[/snapback] TH for Ronde? I hadn't heard that one yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RVJ Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 If we got Ronde for Henry...and traded Nate for #9. I would have to make sure I could trade down with someone first. If not I would ask for the 1st rounder to be in 2006. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloRebound Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Clements will probably ask for and get a $15m signing bonus from someone next year. He's a 25 year old Pro Bowl cornerback. Donahoe seems to only dish out that kind of cash to guys who are both excellent players and team leaders (Spikes and Moulds). A #9 pick probably has a signing bonus in the $6-8m dollar range depending on the length of the deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
col_forbin Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 I'm guessing a trade down to scoop up some more picks. I hope this doesn't happen though, I like to see us sign talent instead of trying to replace it year after year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
envirojeff Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 I'm guessing a trade down to scoop up some more picks. I hope this doesn't happen though, I like to see us sign talent instead of trying to replace it year after year. 308817[/snapback] I'll second that one, Two second rounders and an extra thied would be the best bet. Jeff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 I don't know - I haven't considered picks for the Bills at that high spot. Any thoughts? 308755[/snapback] It depends. I think if they could trade up a few spots for a small price (like Henry to someone with the 9) than i'd go with Mike Williams. He'd be just TOO good for TD to pass up. Ditto if he fell to #9. Otherwise, i'd just see him trade down or maybe pick Alex Barron. But 9 might be a tad high for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 19, 2005 Author Share Posted April 19, 2005 It depends. I think if they could trade up a few spots for a small price (like Henry to someone with the 9) than i'd go with Mike Williams. He'd be just TOO good for TD to pass up. Ditto if he fell to #9. Otherwise, i'd just see him trade down or maybe pick Alex Barron. But 9 might be a tad high for him. 308857[/snapback] MW would be nice, for sure. Perhaps LB Derrick Johnson might fall to #9, too. Merriman may be there. Maybe even Rolle. S Thomas Davis for sure, but like Barron a bit too high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CajunBillsBacker Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Trade down from the #9 pick to around the 15th-25th pick, pick up another 2nd rounder and look for one of the tackles, Barron, Brown, or Barnes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 19, 2005 Author Share Posted April 19, 2005 Trade down from the #9 pick to around the 15th-25th pick, pick up another 2nd rounder and look for one of the tackles, Barron, Brown, or Barnes 308879[/snapback] From dribs and drabs I've read, several teams seem to want to trade down, but I can't recall ones that said they want to trade up...takes two to tango. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 I don't know - I haven't considered picks for the Bills at that high spot. Any thoughts? 308755[/snapback] they'd select a player who isn't as good as nate clements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 19, 2005 Author Share Posted April 19, 2005 they'd select a player who isn't as good as nate clements. 308920[/snapback] Likely true, for at least one more season - for myself, if he walks in '06, he walks. But if it occured, whom might they select? In the #9 spot, not a trade-down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Likely true, for at least one more season - for myself, if he walks in '06, he walks. But if it occured, whom might they select? In the #9 spot, not a trade-down. 308933[/snapback] if this were to happen, one guess would be the best player available barring WR, RB, and QB. they need o-line, d-line, LB (someone who's more of a difference maker than posey) CB, and TE help. however, if they did make the trade, it would seem to me that they're targeting someone. a CB or OT would be my guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Like A Mofo Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 On the surface, I am against trading NC to the Redskins for the 9th overall pick... But if the Bills are able to get Ronde Barber out of Tampa Bay, got the 9th pick AND was able to trade down a bit and get more picks, thus fill the OL holes, and maybe even get a top notch TE or even get Nuge....Im all for it then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hudella Posted April 19, 2005 Share Posted April 19, 2005 Barron, Pack-man, Rolle, Mike Williams, Derrick Johnson, I'd think one of those guys would be there. But didnt TD say if he had a top 10 pick in this draft if he couldnt trade out of it he would pass. Could be BS but i doubt Nate will be traded within the next 5 days, but if he was, for the right deal i wouldnt be totally against it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts