Tenhigh Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 43 minutes ago, 4th&long said: And you think they haven't been advocating for themselves? Nice try tho. Where did I say that? 1
rusty shackleford Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 59 minutes ago, Tenhigh said: I don't think "client" is the right word here. He was a money manager, and from what we can see he was good at that. I think the trafficking and assaults probably overlapped much more with his social cirle than his actual clients. Did he or Maxwell have a diary of all the terrible things that these monsters did? The answer to that is probably not, because of the danger it posed to Epstein himself. Sadly, in reality people are looking for a magic bullet that in all likelihood doesn't exist. Good point. Nobody cares who he managed money for, the public wants to know his child prostitution clients. And yes, a successful criminal wouldn't incriminate themselves with a bad people only list. He most likely covered up record keeping of the illegal activity using his real business as a front, which will just make it harder to decipher it all with him being dead. 1
Tenhigh Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 43 minutes ago, teef said: that point would be misled. there's been numerous documentaries on the subject where victims were interviewed. There's been countless press events where the victims have spoken out about the release, and didn't they address congress a few days ago before the final vote? they've more than advocated on their behalf, and now they need the government to take the next step and do what's right. To imply they haven't done enough or need to take this on completely by themselves doesn't seem right to me. Who is implying they haven't done enough? The point is simply that expecting the politicians who have been failing them for years to now be magically be relied upon seems a dubious proposition at best. 1
teef Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Tenhigh said: Who is implying they haven't done enough? The point is simply that expecting the politicians who have been failing them for years to now be magically be relied upon seems a dubious proposition at best. i do agree. 1
milfandcookies Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 14 minutes ago, Tenhigh said: Who is implying they haven't done enough? The point is simply that expecting the politicians who have been failing them for years to now be magically be relied upon seems a dubious proposition at best. We are relying on politicians because the Department of Justice is failing us 1 1
B-Man Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago The Democrats' Epstein Files Narrative Is Already Imploding Matt Vespa President Trump had nothing to hide, and he also knows that his team can easily swat away any attacks lobbed by Democrats over the Epstein Files. They’ve done so before. With Congress pushing through a bill releasing all the files yesterday, some on the Hill are already off to the races and have smashed into a wall, too. It’s imploding, not least because Democrats are named. It’s as if Democrats didn’t think this vote would ever come; therefore, they had a cash cow regarding fundraising. That’s gone now. The dog has bitten the car, and they don’t know what to do. If it’s not that, they’re accusing the wrong people of being too cozy with the dead and disgraced New York financier. https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/11/19/the-dems-epstein-files-narrative-is-already-imploding-n2666663 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 24 minutes ago, B-Man said: The Democrats' Epstein Files Narrative Is Already Imploding Matt Vespa President Trump had nothing to hide, and he also knows that his team can easily swat away any attacks lobbed by Democrats over the Epstein Files. They’ve done so before. With Congress pushing through a bill releasing all the files yesterday, some on the Hill are already off to the races and have smashed into a wall, too. It’s imploding, not least because Democrats are named. It’s as if Democrats didn’t think this vote would ever come; therefore, they had a cash cow regarding fundraising. That’s gone now. The dog has bitten the car, and they don’t know what to do. If it’s not that, they’re accusing the wrong people of being too cozy with the dead and disgraced New York financier. https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/11/19/the-dems-epstein-files-narrative-is-already-imploding-n2666663 sure piggy. the R's are winning big on epstein. the latest polls conclusively prove it 1
Tenhigh Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: sure piggy. the R's are winning big on epstein. the latest polls conclusively prove it Be nice, Dr. Nassar
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Tenhigh said: Be nice, Dr. Nassar argue the point, rotgut. 1
teef Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago i've never heard of townhall.com before, but it strikes me a unbiased, well balanced source of news. 1
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 24 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: sure piggy. the R's are winning big on epstein. the latest polls conclusively prove it Aww look, dems got thier new buzzword, cute.
Wolfgang Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Aww look, dems got thier new buzzword, cute. He confused you with his wife...
teef Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, Wolfgang said: He confused you with his wife... shhhhhh. emojis and clips. 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Aww look, dems got thier new buzzword, cute. kindly provided by coarse, crude trump. He should probably look at his profile in the mirror from tine to time. Svelte, he is not. Maybe he was referring to the character in Golding's "Lord of the Flies" but I don't believe he reads. Perhaps they forced him to in military school. Who won the epstein political battle? R's or D's? 1
muppy Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 1 hour ago, B-Man said: The Democrats' Epstein Files Narrative Is Already Imploding Matt Vespa President Trump had nothing to hide, and he also knows that his team can easily swat away any attacks lobbed by Democrats over the Epstein Files. They’ve done so before. With Congress pushing through a bill releasing all the files yesterday, some on the Hill are already off to the races and have smashed into a wall, too. It’s imploding, not least because Democrats are named. It’s as if Democrats didn’t think this vote would ever come; therefore, they had a cash cow regarding fundraising. That’s gone now. The dog has bitten the car, and they don’t know what to do. If it’s not that, they’re accusing the wrong people of being too cozy with the dead and disgraced New York financier. https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/11/19/the-dems-epstein-files-narrative-is-already-imploding-n2666663 he says that now because very likely those files are scrubbed of his name. I'd bet money. why give Maxwell a cushy prison assignment? seriously Donnie? why campaign on releasing the files only to completely refuse tooth and nail. his minions in lockstep with his wishes. Disgusting. all of it. None More so that girls were sexually abused. Edited 1 hour ago by muppy
teef Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago since it doesn't matter how credible the news sources are when we post here, i'm just gonna leave this here for people to look over... https://people.com/epstein-s-brother-heard-from-a-pretty-good-source-that-the-epstein-files-are-being-scrubbed-of-republican-names-11851691 2
muppy Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, teef said: since it doesn't matter how credible the news sources are when we post here, i'm just gonna leave this here for people to look over... https://people.com/epstein-s-brother-heard-from-a-pretty-good-source-that-the-epstein-files-are-being-scrubbed-of-republican-names-11851691 yeah who would doubt this? I don't. It makes perfect sense. why fight so hard only to just agree to release the files politics is sooo skeezy teef. I put nothing past Naranja. 1 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 5 minutes ago, muppy said: he says that now because very likely those files are scrubbed of his name. I'd bet money. why give Maxwell a cushy prison assignment? seriously Donnie? why campaign on releasing the files only to completely refuse tooth and nail. his minions in lockstep with his wishes. Disgusting. all of it. None More so that girls were sexually abused. That makes little sense, Mup. The dems had those files under Biden. Trump was investigated up/down/sideways/front-to-back. The goal of the prior admin was to break him financially, spiritually, permanently. It's inconceivable that they would have access to information on that level and not release it. Meanwhile, Hakeem looks to partner w/ Eppy. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 6 minutes ago, teef said: since it doesn't matter how credible the news sources are when we post here, i'm just gonna leave this here for people to look over... https://people.com/epstein-s-brother-heard-from-a-pretty-good-source-that-the-epstein-files-are-being-scrubbed-of-republican-names-11851691 to be fair, it matters more to one side than the other. 1
teef Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: to be fair, it matters more to one side than the other. it sure does. i checked out townhall.com for the first time. it's oddly similar to the people.com site...it's just so heavily biased to one side. i have no idea how anyone could post that as legit news. 1 1
Recommended Posts