Jump to content

Should Tomi Lahren be attacked


Recommended Posts

 

8 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

Terrible agendas like maintaining the intellectual and moral culture which brought us the Enlightenment

 

 

:mellow: Yah sure, The Enlightenment.

 

What about the thirty-year war that preceded it?. -You know... The one that killed nearly ten million ethno-Europeans... -Who's culture was that?

 

Could it be the same intellectual and moral culture that brought you mustard gas, WWI, and 15 million more corpses?

 

Why should we "maintain" above all, the same "moral" culture that brought us Auschwitz, Dachau, Babi Yar, Guernica, and Oradour Sur Glane,?

 

Ancestral pride is one thing, but your Ethno-European highlight reel left ALOT of sh_tty  scenes on the cutting-room floor.

 

The next time you wanna wax-poetic about whitewashed, white-guy history, you should do it around people who don't know any.

 

8 hours ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

Terrible agendas like maintaining the intellectual and moral culture which brought us the Enlightenment, incentivizing the nuclear family, promoting prosperity through economic growth, rejecting post-modernism as the destructive and regressive neo-Marxist agenda that it is, establishing global reforms which have a real chance to bring about a real and lasting peace through the denuclearization of North Korea, the overthrow of the Mulahs, and the reforming of the Saudi government, and working to reform the US intelligence apparatus restoring the protection of the individuals right to privacy and their Fourth Amendment protections, standing staunch in their insistence on safeguarding Constitutional protections guaranteed by the First and Second Amendment?

 

More sing-song BS you couldn't get captain America himself to say.  The woman in question, Tomi Lahren,  unfortumately, got a glass of water thrown in her face.

 

She'll be fine.... It's a far cry from a German Shepherd and a firehose.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, #34fan said:

 

 

:mellow: Yah sure, The Enlightenment.

 

What about the thirty-year war that preceded it?. -You know... The one that killed nearly ten million ethno-Europeans... -Who's culture was that?

 

Could it be the same intellectual and moral culture that brought you mustard gas, WWI, and 15 million more corpses?

 

 

d7a0d8d3f9959f0e2bd1e8bed5e592b6e645533d26d54b858575fc44d34e81c3.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, #34fan said:

 

Careful. -He's a known....

 

th?id=OIP.sPqAoRP61f3BL6UDxGxlyAHaHb&pid

 

 

 

He can be a douchebag, but that's only because he's usually running circles around some ignorant leftist who can't defend their rhetoric.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

but that's only because he's usually running circles around some ignorant leftist who can't defend their rhetoric.

 

That's the only kind of guest FOX books for that douchebag show.

Edited by #34fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, #34fan said:

 

That's the only kind of guest FOX books for that douchebag show.

 

You obviously don’t watch his show to make that kinda of statement.

 

You sound like someone who watches Don Lemon, who is the REAL douche bag on MSM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, njbuff said:

 

You obviously don’t watch his show to make that kinda of statement.

 

You sound like someone who watches Don Lemon, who is the REAL douche bag on MSM.

 

Don Lemon is the perfect leftist poster boy:

 

a black homosexual who toes the line

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, njbuff said:

 

You obviously don’t watch his show to make that kinda of statement.

 

You sound like someone who watches Don Lemon, who is the REAL douche bag on MSM.

 

Not really fair to call Lemon a douche bag.  Lemon hasn't been anywhere near a vagina in decades

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Andrew in CA said:

Sorry, i thought you were calling me an idiot.  I went off on a bit of a tangent as you saw with my dialogue with JSP that i feel people resort to name-calling really quickly and that just gets everyone's guard up and derails any convo.  Now, i did what i preached against and put words in your mouth so I'm sorry for that.

 

In the hypothetical you pose yes, if someone is approaching TL with an object in his/her hand and is acting aggressively, then they are asking for a response from the bodyguard.  

 

Maybe i'm taking it to an extreme, but i think people have to face the consequences of their words, and those consequences aren't always going to be friendly.  They can be hostile or rude.  But i draw the line at assault (putting someone in fear of physical contact) and battery (actual physical contact), both because it's illegal and i think morally wrong -- respond to words with words (or boos, jeers, etc.), but don't touch someone or attempt to do so.

 

And as JSP brought up i think it goes both ways.  BLM protesters say and do a lot of provocative, controversial things.  If they are out in public, people who disagree with them should be free to do so, and the BLM people should expect blowback/backlash.  I think there is a tendency on the left to think you can say what you want, and because it's "speaking truth to power" or whatever, they think no one can respond to them.  In other words, they think they can speak, and no one else can respond.  I disagree with that.  

 

I guess when it comes down to it, my point is that when you take a stand, when you make yourself an object of attention (whether you make money off of it or not), people will react, both positively and negatively.  I don't think you get a shield of armor or get to cry foul if people react to you with boos, silence, what have you, out in public. 

 

And I'm not saying that you were saying that (about Tomi/anyone else getting a shield of armor), I'm just circling back to my original post -- which, had i known would get a  reaction, i would have elaborated on more fully.  But i didn't, so now I am facing the some backlash of my clearly unpopular opinion, and that's OK,  i get it, if you post, you get a response, and it's not always going to be one that agrees with you.   

You're a study in contrast. Rational, reasonable in response here, yet comfortable with people crossing what seems to be one of the most basic rules of civilized society just because they disagree with what someone says or thinks.  I realize it's going to happen, I just don't see where it's acceptable to do so, or that a person should accept that it's a byproduct of some collection of the spoken word. 

 

In the end, basic rules should apply.  A guy harasses __________, kick his ass out of the restaurant.  If he gives you sh-t, call the police, though by all means let him use the bathroom before he goes. 

 

Dont sweat the need to elaborate, we're all a study in contrast.  I think Leo DiCaprio is a world class hypocrite but damn it I really like most of his movies.  

 

2 hours ago, /dev/null said:

 

Not really fair to call Lemon a douche bag.  Lemon hasn't been anywhere near a vagina in decades

A+ effort there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Attempting to argue that the Enlightenment (a philosophical and intellectual movement, not a culture) somehow caused a war that preceded it and World War One proves one to be a douchebag. 

 

Ah, -So the REAL problem is, that you can't f__king read...

 

In his post, TYTT accurately credited Europeans with the  70-80 year period of LIBERAL philosophies, and ideas known as the "enlightenment".

 

His post got me misty-eyed reading the great contributions to Western society, until I remembered the actual, gruesome history of Europe.

 

-A 5-century bloodbath with an "enlightenment break" before it picked right up again... Why is it wrong to temper alt-right adulation towards Euro culture with

 

a little truth?

 

10 hours ago, joesixpack said:

 

Don Lemon is the perfect leftist poster boy:

 

I can't stand Don Lemon.

 

13 hours ago, KD in CA said:

 

Exactly.  Where does he find these laughable buffoons?  

 

 

 

Or  Carlson, or Larry Elders..

 

As for Maxine Waters.... Thanks for killing any chance I had of getting a boner this weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, #34fan said:

 

In his post, TYTT accurately credited Europeans with the  70-80 year period of LIBERAL philosophies, and ideas known as the "enlightenment".

 

 

Classically liberal philosophies, which today don't differ much from American libertarianism.  I'm actually far better described as a cynical classical liberal than a libertarian if we're being overly specific.

 

Modern American liberalism has almost nothing in common with the classical liberalism birthed by the Enlightenment.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, #34fan said:

 

Ah, -So the REAL problem is, that you can't f__king read...

 

In his post, TYTT accurately credited Europeans with the  70-80 year period of LIBERAL philosophies, and ideas known as the "enlightenment".

 

His post got me misty-eyed reading the great contributions to Western society, until I remembered the actual, gruesome history of Europe.

 

-A 5-century bloodbath with an "enlightenment break" before it picked right up again... Why is it wrong to temper alt-right adulation towards Euro culture with

 

 

Almost all of history for all cultures was absolutely barbaric.  In most places in the world it still is.

 

We live in an oasis which affords us the relative peace an prosperity we enjoy.

 

It is the absolute height of ignorance to not recognize how the world has worked for the duration of human history, and to attribute the worlds ills to our European ancestors.  The Europeans were no different than anyone else in their ambitions, they were just more technologically advanced at the time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's conflating a philosophical/intellectual movement and evolution which (transcends culture) with the culture - and military history of the continent... and he thinks he's making a dynamite point in the process. 

 

34 is a fool, ignorant of basic definitions of simple words, let alone the nuances inherent in more complex philosophical discussions. 

 

And he proves it with each and every post he makes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

He's conflating a philosophical/intellectual movement and evolution which (transcends culture) with the culture - and military history of the continent... and he thinks he's making a dynamite point in the process. 

 

34 is a fool, ignorant of basic definitions of simple words, let alone the nuances inherent in more complex philosophical discussions. 

 

And he proves it with each and every post he makes. 

 

Ignorance works as a convenient airbrush.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

He's conflating a philosophical/intellectual movement and evolution which (transcends culture) with the culture - and military history of the continent... and he thinks he's making a dynamite point in the process. 

 

34 is a fool, ignorant of basic definitions of simple words, let alone the nuances inherent in more complex philosophical discussions. 

 

And he proves it with each and every post he makes. 

 

I'm glad your menstrual cycle is playing out for the entire board to see.

 

I simply echoed the generalities TYTTY used to sum-up the effect of Euro-history on Western Values.  

 

He posted, what he posted... Let it stand.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, #34fan said:

 

I'm glad your menstrual cycle is playing out for the entire board to see.

 

I simply echoed the generalities TYTTY used to sum-up the effect of Euro-history on Western Values.  

 

He posted, what he posted... Let it stand.

 

 

 

I read what he posted. Then I read your response. You embarrassed yourself. He did not. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I read what he posted. Then I read your response. You embarrassed yourself. He did not. 

 

It's embarrassing how poorly the alt-right handles truth... What a bunch of babies.

Edited by #34fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, #34fan said:

It's embarrassing how poorly the alt-right handles truth... What a bunch of babies.

 

You cannot even get an insult right. If you're labeling me as alt-right you're even dimmer than you portray yourself to be in your posts. And make no mistake, that would be quite a feat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You cannot even get an insult right. If you're labeling me as alt-right you're even dimmer than you portray yourself to be in your posts. 

 

You lose.

 

Feel free to stay in the alt-right closet as long as the four of you losers are comfortable in there.

 

Btw, that's not a flashlight in Toms pocket.

Edited by #34fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, #34fan said:

 

You lose.

 

Feel free to stay in the alt-right closet as long as the four of you losers are comfortable in there.

 

Btw, that's not a flashlight in Toms pocket.

 

I don't understand how someone as thoroughly stupid as you can still type comprehensible sentences.  Have you considered maybe writing for Hollywood?

 

You're out-gatoring gatorman.  That is not a badge of honor.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/30/2018 at 11:42 AM, Andrew in CA said:

I hear you and agree -- i've lurked these boards for a long time (joined in '06) and people like that, or Conner, or whoever preceded Conner, would come on here just to get a rise out of the majority conservative faction of the board and start dumb ****.  But there are people like me who dip their toe in time to time with no agenda, just a bit of sporadic free time, and may have a different opinion, without the agenda.  

Conner, Molson_Golden, etc. These were not trolls. 

 

You're not trolling if you're posting 3 new topics a day. You're spamming. Doubly so if what you write doesn't comport with the myriad of links you post. Or, as often was the case, what you write directly contradicts what is in your own link(s).

 

No, if you've been lurking here as long as you say: then you know that back then this was hardly a majority conservative board. No way. In fact, the opposite was true...until the Obamacare Debate started. That was the last straw for the leftists on this board. The smart ones knew that staying here meant daily abuse they had no chance of countering. So, they ran.

 

Then, and only then, did this become a "majority conservative board". Most of us have been here the whole time. It's the left that has run, which, well, what else does one expect leftists to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

I don't understand how someone as thoroughly stupid as you can still type comprehensible sentences.  Have you considered maybe writing for Hollywood?

 

You're out-gatoring gatorman.  That is not a badge of honor.

 

What exactly does a closeted, alt-right, coward know about honor?

 

-And what's with the gatorman hard-on?... -I'm starting to think he stood you up for prom.

 

42 minutes ago, OCinBuffalo said:

Conner, Molson_Golden, etc. These were not trolls. 

 

You're not trolling if you're posting 3 new topics a day. You're spamming. Doubly so if what you write doesn't comport with the myriad of links you post. Or, as often was the case, what you write directly contradicts what is in your own link(s).

 

No, if you've been lurking here as long as you say: then you know that back then this was hardly a majority conservative board. No way. In fact, the opposite was true...until the Obamacare Debate started. That was the last straw for the leftists on this board. The smart ones knew that staying here meant daily abuse they had no chance of countering. So, they ran.

 

th?id=OIP.6DKVGfTQ1y6MOXYn98uZxQHaFn&pid

Edited by #34fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Image result for funny football player running into wall gif

 

My absolute favorite Redskins moment.

 

Wonder how he's going to do in suing the NFL for CTE.  "The court finds in favor of the NFL, and suggests that maybe Mr. Frerotte should sue the wall instead."

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, #34fan said:

 

What exactly does a closeted, alt-right, coward know about honor?

 

-And what's with the gatorman hard-on?... -I'm starting to think he stood you up for prom.

 

 

th?id=OIP.6DKVGfTQ1y6MOXYn98uZxQHaFn&pid

First of all, Great Job! genius, you somehow have decided to take on the two best killers on this board, at the same time. That's all I have to say for now. Well, that, and: welcome to being my new toy. Tom will try to hog you, like he has with every unmitigated moron. We shall see.

 

EDIT: Oh yeah, and as far as the OP goes? I guess when I think of attacked? It's specific to each person. My attack on Tomi would be well planned and executed. Who knows if it would work, but, if it did I guarantee: nobody would be tweeting about it the next day. Well, not in English anyway.

Edited by OCinBuffalo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, OCinBuffalo said:

First of all, Great Job! genius, you somehow have decided to take on the two best killers on this board, at the same time. That's all I have to say for now. Well, that, and: welcome to being my new toy. Tom will try to hog you, like he has with every unmitigated moron. We shall see.

 

EDIT: Oh yeah, and as far as the OP goes? I guess when I think of attacked? It's specific to each person. My attack on Tomi would be well planned and executed. Who knows if it would work, but, if it did I guarantee: nobody would be tweeting about it the next day. Well, not in English anyway.

To get a dirty job done, you call the Albanians. Everyone knows this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OCinBuffalo said:

First of all, Great Job! genius, you somehow have decided to take on the two best killers on this board, at the same time. That's all I have to say for now. Well, that, and: welcome to being my new toy. Tom will try to hog you, like he has with every unmitigated moron. We shall see.

 

EDIT: Oh yeah, and as far as the OP goes? I guess when I think of attacked? It's specific to each person. My attack on Tomi would be well planned and executed. Who knows if it would work, but, if it did I guarantee: nobody would be tweeting about it the next day. Well, not in English anyway.

I think it would be funny to watch you go after her. Those of you in the Buffalo area think of OC as the guy in the Casino Niagara commercial who got lucky, not with the girl at the bar,  but at the slots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, OCinBuffalo said:

EDIT: Oh yeah, and as far as the OP goes? I guess when I think of attacked? It's specific to each person. My attack on Tomi would be well planned and executed. 

 

Right.  You'd monologue for ten minutes about yourself, then claim you had her number and really put her in her place, at which point she'd respond "What?  What the !@#$ are you talking about?  Who are you?"

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 6/1/2018 at 10:03 AM, DC Tom said:

 

Right.  You'd monologue for ten minutes about yourself, then claim you had her number and really put her in her place, at which point she'd respond "What?  What the !@#$ are you talking about?  Who are you?"

Nice work:

You completely and totally missed the subtext. Some days I wonder if your IQ is as high as you say.

 

Read it again, moron, and then think about her...as a chick in a bar, or, in your married-assed case...think about your fantasy of how you would approach that chick at Best Buy that you like, you know, the butterface one?

 

Ya. Now you get it. Jesus. You even hooked Greggy into your complete swing and miss. Greggy has an excuse: he's gay. What's yours?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/1/2018 at 12:04 AM, 3rdnlng said:

I think it would be funny to watch you go after her. Those of you in the Buffalo area think of OC as the guy in the Casino Niagara commercial who got lucky, not with the girl at the bar,  but at the slots.

Yeah...but reality just doesn't meet with that. How typical of a DC_Tom toady.

 

Girls have been chasing me my whole life. I remain as baffled by this since day 1 of recognizing it, and as unsure how exactly to respond, as ever. I am by nature an introvert, and any extrovert stuff you see is learned behavior, that I admit, I often fail at emulating properly. Women are weird, annoying, drains on my thought processes, but also can be fun. While this state has its rewards, its risks and consequences are significant as well.

 

See, I don't just get lucky with 1 girl at the bar. Those are the good days, but they are rare. No, no, no I get unlucky because 2 or more girls at the bar, who I find out later have been rivals for years, decide that tonight I "get" to be a prop in their drama == a trophy. They come at me like hyenas, and are nasty and mean if I show the slightest attention to another.

 

Look: I travel, so it's not like I know these people. My whole life has been spent, gloriously IMHO, walking into yet another new bar, and this is what happens about 2/5 times. Some days I am happy to walk into a dive where there are NO girls at the bar. A quiet night can be the best night.

 

Hate on me all you want, plenty of boyfriends/husband(even gay dudes) have, even though I DO nothing to encourage it: nothing will change. Like it or not, this has been going on my entire life, and no amount of your wishful invective, or seemingly, anything, will change this reality.

Edited by OCinBuffalo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...