DCOrange Posted January 30, 2018 Author Share Posted January 30, 2018 7 hours ago, Virgil said: He has Jackson graded higher than Mayfield. Am I missing something here? I haven't seen that anywhere else Higher than Rosen as well. The guys at WalterFootball had it that way for awhile but moved him down in the past month or so. Otherwise yeah, I think he’s the only one. I personally agree with him though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthNYfan Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 4 hours ago, GunnerBill said: There are probably 10 Quarterbacks in this class easily better prospects than Nate Peterman. What about running backs and WRs who have thrown TD passes on gimmick plays?? Can we count them?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEraBills Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 6 hours ago, GunnerBill said: There are probably 10 Quarterbacks in this class easily better prospects than Nate Peterman. I didn't say there weren't guys in the class better than Peterman. I just said outside of the top guys I'd have to ask some serious questions. And I think you have to compare their college production to his. Not the small sample size we have of him failing last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GunnerBill Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 5 minutes ago, NewEraBills said: I didn't say there weren't guys in the class better than Peterman. I just said outside of the top guys I'd have to ask some serious questions. And I think you have to compare their college production to his. Not the small sample size we have of him failing last season. I don't think comparing production is sufficient. You have to compare their tape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEraBills Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, GunnerBill said: I don't think comparing production is sufficient. You have to compare their tape. I agree with that too. Actually just to be clear, when I talk about production I'm not simply talking about numbers. I'm talking about everything that I mentioned in a previous post, which requires watching the tape. Edited January 30, 2018 by NewEraBills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLTbills Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 On 1/29/2018 at 10:37 AM, DCOrange said: There's still some missing prospects; he hasn't had a chance to publish a grade on everyone yet. I'm certain Rosen will be one of the top 3 (I'm guessing 1st) QBs once he's added in. seems kind of strange though that he skipped over a potential top 3-5 guy, but made sure to evaluate a potential 7th-undrafted guy.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCOrange Posted January 30, 2018 Author Share Posted January 30, 2018 24 minutes ago, CLTbills said: seems kind of strange though that he skipped over a potential top 3-5 guy, but made sure to evaluate a potential 7th-undrafted guy.... It appears that it's still under construction. For example, he bumped Lamar down from a 6.3 (11th best in the class) to a 6.0 today (19th best and now behind Rosen). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLTbills Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 4 hours ago, DCOrange said: It appears that it's still under construction. For example, he bumped Lamar down from a 6.3 (11th best in the class) to a 6.0 today (19th best and now behind Rosen). I get that but it still doesn't make sense. Wouldn't the first ones you evaluate be the guys that everyone's drooling over, instead of some guy that might not even get drafted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 On 1/29/2018 at 8:16 AM, NewEraBills said: One thing I will also say too is with the 2nd tier guys, if it were me, and if I didn't feel that I'm getting an upgrade over Nathan Peterman, then I wouldn't take them. Just use the pick to fill another position. To me, that's the key. If you cannot land one of the top guys, I don't think it is worthwhile to take a QB unless you feel you are getting someone who is an upgrade over Peterman. I would not take anyone in rd 2-4 unless they are a Peterman upgrade, who we took in rd 5. This is why we might be more inclined to trade up if someone drops rather than sit still. At this point I only see Rosen, Darnold, Mayfield as significant upgrades over Peterman. I think Falk and Rudolph MIGHT be upgrades, but by how much. Falk has some frame issues and Zerlien is correct in him taking a beating. That showed this year as he played the majority of the season with a broken wrist, which impacted his throwing mechanics and decision making. Darnold is the ONLY qb worthy of a trade up by us. Absolutely no other qb justifies this move. If Rudolph is there in the 2nd round, he should be the pick over Falk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCOrange Posted January 31, 2018 Author Share Posted January 31, 2018 10 hours ago, CLTbills said: I get that but it still doesn't make sense. Wouldn't the first ones you evaluate be the guys that everyone's drooling over, instead of some guy that might not even get drafted? Could be that he has more film to get through on some of the bigger guys whereas the smaller school guys he felt comfortable knocking out after seeing a couple games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Hammersticks Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 Calvin Ridley has “tight skin.” Ewww. Pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts