Deranged Rhino Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 (edited) 2 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Flynn lied. Not according to the FBI, IG, DOJ, or the TRANSCRIPT OF THE CALL. But when you've already admitted that you haven't read any of the relevant material, filings, testimony, or case law -- you come to stupid conclusions that aren't based in fact. Keep on proving how shite of an attorney you actually are, Section. Edited June 10, 2020 by Deranged Rhino 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Not according to the FBI, IG, or DOJ. But when you've already admitted that you haven't read any of the relevant material, filings, testimony, or case law -- you come to stupid conclusions that aren't based in fact. Keep on proving how shite of an attorney you actually are, Section. You really think he's an attorney, ***** or otherwise? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Not according to the FBI, IG, DOJ, or the TRANSCRIPT OF THE CALL. But when you've already admitted that you haven't read any of the relevant material, filings, testimony, or case law -- you come to stupid conclusions that aren't based in fact. Keep on proving how shite of an attorney you actually are, Section. Flynn admitted it! Outstanding! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: You really think he's an attorney, ***** or otherwise? I worked in law long enough to know there are plenty of really dumb and bad attorneys. So I can't completely rule it out. Either way, his track record down here should be required reading for any prospective clients in his future. I'm sure they'd love to see how unglued to reality, facts, logic, or common sense he is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Not according to the FBI, IG, DOJ, or the TRANSCRIPT OF THE CALL. But when you've already admitted that you haven't read any of the relevant material, filings, testimony, or case law -- you come to stupid conclusions that aren't based in fact. Keep on proving how shite of an attorney you actually are, Section. Got any more case law for me, Mr. Dershowitz? I can’t wait to see it! Better yet, get it to Flynn’s counsel ASAP. They need you! Just now, Deranged Rhino said: I worked in law long enough to know there are plenty of really dumb and bad attorneys. So I can't completely rule it out. Either way, his track record down here should be required reading for any prospective clients in his future. I'm sure they'd love to see how unglued to reality, facts, logic, or common sense he is. Is that where you came up with the “case record” phrase? That one was rich! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 Just now, SectionC3 said: Got any more case law for me, Mr. Dershowitz? I can’t wait to see it! Better yet, get it to Flynn’s counsel ASAP. They need you! I gave you the deciding case law to read. You've ignored it. Because you're a very dumb person, SectionC3. And your legal chops are wanting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: I worked in law long enough to know there are plenty of really dumb and bad attorneys. So I can't completely rule it out. Either way, his track record down here should be required reading for any prospective clients in his future. I'm sure they'd love to see how unglued to reality, facts, logic, or common sense he is. I guess I have been very fortunate to have worked with some top-notch legal talent. I have always been amazed at the smarts those men and women have exhibited. Now, granted, none of it has been criminal law, but nevertheless, some truly smart people. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: I gave you the deciding case law to read. You've ignored it. Because you're a very dumb person, SectionC3. And your legal chops are wanting. “Deciding case law!” Outstanding. Now I’ve heard two novel things today! Keep it up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: I guess I have been very fortunate to have worked with some top-notch legal talent. I have always been amazed at the smarts those men and women have exhibited. Now, granted, none of it has been criminal law, but nevertheless, some truly smart people. I was fortunate in my experience that the dumb attorneys whose path I crossed were always on the opposing side. Our firm was stocked with really sharp and smart people (doing SUPER boring work imo lol). Just now, SectionC3 said: “Deciding case law!” Outstanding. Now I’ve heard two novel things today! Keep it up! All that to say: "I won't read it, because doing so would expose how little I understand about the law, practicing it or otherwise". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: I was fortunate in my experience that the dumb attorneys whose path I crossed were always on the opposing side. Our firm was stocked with really sharp and smart people (doing SUPER boring work imo lol). Apparently the boring nature of the work gave you time to hatch some of your nonsense conspiracy theories and invent such gems as “case records” and “deciding case law.” Well done, sir! Edited June 10, 2020 by SectionC3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 All that to say: "I won't read it, because doing so would expose how little I understand about the law, practicing it or otherwise". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: I was fortunate in my experience that the dumb attorneys whose path I crossed were always on the opposing side. Our firm was stocked with really sharp and smart people (doing SUPER boring work imo lol). All that to say: "I won't read it, because doing so would expose how little I understand about the law, practicing it or otherwise". You’re right, I should read your “deciding case law.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Guy In Pants Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 (edited) Am I to believe that there are living, breathing people who honestly believe that all corruption exists because of a Trump administration and that there is no possible way that career politicians and officials in various government department couldn’t possibly be corrupt? What planet have some of you been on over the course of your lives? Hell; what country have you been living in? Obviously, you only started paying attention to politics after it was rumored Trump was going to buy the Bills and then that he was going to run for President and all you knew was that you hated the thought of him as owner and that translated to hating him as president. Then; you latched on to those who shared the opinion you had prematurely formed and are riding that horse until his legs fall off whether or not you’re getting anywhere. Don’t get me wrong; there are a couple of posters I have read on here that can 100% give genuine and proven, factual reasons as to why they may disagree with Donald Trump. But, I can guarantee those few posters also realize that the corruption before him and around him in D.C is also a disturbing thing and just because they don’t like Trump; they’re not willing to accept it. Edited June 10, 2020 by The Guy In Pants 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 Come on, SectionOfReallyShittyLawyers, put your money where your mouth is. If you think that filing was such a "takedown" then you must think Flynn's going to get sentenced. How bout we make a bet? If Flynn gets sentenced, I'll go on vacation for a year. When Flynn gets the case dismissed with prejudice, then you have to go on a vacation for a year. Or are you even more full of shite than I gave you credit for? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 Another take... (odd number of tweets) I found this distressing: 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Another take... (odd number of tweets) I found this distressing: Looks like Gordo messed up her Apprendi analysis here. The unconvicted crime (here, perjury) can be considered in determining where within a permissible range a sentence should fall. It can’t be used to enhance a sentence beyond its permissible maximum term. But I’m sure legal savants Psycho Rhino and Buffalo Gal knew that! 5 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Another take... (odd number of tweets) I found this distressing: Apprendi was decided in 2000, Gordo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Come on, SectionOfReallyShittyLawyers, put your money where your mouth is. If you think that filing was such a "takedown" then you must think Flynn's going to get sentenced. How bout we make a bet? If Flynn gets sentenced, I'll go on vacation for a year. When Flynn gets the case dismissed with prejudice, then you have to go on a vacation for a year. Or are you even more full of shite than I gave you credit for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlando Tim Posted June 10, 2020 Share Posted June 10, 2020 5 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Looks like Gordo messed up her Apprendi analysis here. The unconvicted crime (here, perjury) can be considered in determining where within a permissible range a sentence should fall. It can’t be used to enhance a sentence beyond its permissible maximum term. But I’m sure legal savants Psycho Rhino and Buffalo Gal knew that! So if the initial conviction is overturned- which is what is happening here- then you can not use the perjury charge as if it has been adjudicated. I was unaware of this being codified in law but thank you- you are a great lawyer for the Flynn team. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts