D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted January 12, 2017 Author Share Posted January 12, 2017 Playmaker if i dont pick up the option. Pryor Jefferies I could also be ok with Mahomes (2nd i hope but likely gonna go in 1st) and Mike Williams at 10 I lke your thinking man. Keep the fullback so we can continue to run at an elite level. Add a decisive qb as well. Of course have a FB . We are talking about a style change. Why do we have to aim to be a ground and pound team still. Attacking and getting a lead will help the D as well. Get playmakers on the outside and get them the ball early and often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnwalter Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 why not lynn for OC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted January 12, 2017 Author Share Posted January 12, 2017 why not lynn for OC? He's a possibility, I just am not sure what he is at this point. He was running Romans offens so it is possible he would be different. I don't believe at this point he will return either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Who Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 (edited) I like the OP for the most part, though I am not sold on TT. I like Deshaun Watson. This means I don't think he's Taylor 2.0. At minimum, he's a legit 6'3" and I suspect Taylor is actually around my height (5'11"). All that said, I love the Mike Williams at #10 idea. I would still like to add a qb early in the draft. I don't think Watson will fall, but if he is around late first, I find a way to move up and grab him. I also like Mahomes in the second. I'm okay with Taylor as a bridge qb. If he turns out better than I imagine, great. I'd be happy to be wrong. I read somewhere that the particular version of the 4-3 McDermott favors (cover 3?) does not require outstanding safety play. I don't think we need to spend a first on safety. WR and RT are the most immediate offensive needs if Taylor is retained. On D, I hope we keep Gilmore and Zac somehow. Apparently there is a lb on Carolina, AJ Klein, that would be a good fit that may come our way. Sorry, this is a bit rambling. To johnwalter: I have no idea what kind of offense Lynn would actually implement. It just seems it might be uncomfortable given he was considered for the head coach position and we went elsewhere. If there were players who preferred Lynn, that might add tensions as well, though that is obviously speculation and maybe it is not a problem at all. Edited January 12, 2017 by Dr. Who Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted January 12, 2017 Author Share Posted January 12, 2017 I like the OP for the most part, though I am not sold on TT. I like Deshaun Watson. This means I don't think he's Taylor 2.0. At minimum, he's a legit 6'3" and I suspect Taylor is actually around my height (5'11"). All that said, I love the Mike Williams at #10 idea. I would still like to add a qb early in the draft. I don't think Watson will fall, but if he is around late first, I find a way to move up and grab him. I also like Mahomes in the second. I'm okay with Taylor as a bridge qb. If he turns out better than I imagine, great. I'd be happy to be wrong. I read somewhere that the particular version of the 4-3 McDermott favors (cover 3?) does not require outstanding safety play. I don't think we need to spend a first on safety. WR and RT are the most immediate offensive needs if Taylor is retained. On D, I hope we keep Gilmore and Zac somehow. Apparently there is a lb on Carolina, AJ Klein, that would be a good fit that may come our way. Sorry, this is a bit rambling. To johnwalter: I have no idea what kind of offense Lynn would actually implement. It just seems it might be uncomfortable given he was considered for the head coach position and we went elsewhere. If there were players who preferred Lynn, that might add tensions as well, though that is obviously speculation and maybe it is not a problem at all. I like the 2 Draftable QBs you mention, especially Watson. My personal preference is to get the Receiver at #10 and renegotiate TT back to BUFF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills_fan_in_raleigh Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 go spread triple TE's and 1 WR....biggest mismatch if TE has LB covering you throw.....if TE has DB covering you run. not a bad idea. Plus putting TE in motion with a LB covering will also open up a hole for the run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Im good with a qb at 10 I am not good with starting them....I think that is a mistake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinii Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 The grass is always greener..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted January 15, 2017 Author Share Posted January 15, 2017 (edited) This article has quotes from Childress and is about the spread offense. I found it quite interesting, and quite appropriate to this topic discussed last week. Taylor would fit in this scheme as well. Draft Mike Williams and put the FB on the bench until short yardage situation and late game. https://theringer.com/nfl-spread-offense-quarterbacks-72148a036561#.9pmn4vlv6 Edited January 15, 2017 by horned dogs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 We don't need to come out an pound the ball to pass. Unless you've got a plan to bring Brady, Brees or Rodgers aboard, I'm going to have to disagree with you with all of my heart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted January 15, 2017 Author Share Posted January 15, 2017 Unless you've got a plan to bring Brady, Brees or Rodgers aboard, I'm going to have to disagree with you with all of my heart. Actually, if you can throw, you can throw and this has been statsictically shown over the years. In a relative sense of course, you do need to keep them honest I think. I'm not talking about abandoning the run though. Just spread the field with more athelticism and don't be afraid to come out attacking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Actually, if you can throw, you can throw and this has been statsictically shown over the years. In a relative sense of course, you do need to keep them honest I think. I'm not talking about abandoning the run though. Just spread the field with more athelticism and don't be afraid to come out attacking. Do we have a QB who can throw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manther Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Just get me a Modern Balances NFL Offense. The decide on a QB to execute the ENTIRE offense Agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iinii Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 Do we have a QB who can throw? 3 of them actually, it just doesn't always go to a receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manther Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 (edited) Martellus Bennett and Jared Cook are FAs, Gragg is coming back. What is your idea? We could have the receivers to make it work! No gimmicks please. Just play football and do it well. Edited January 15, 2017 by Manther Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billsfan1972 Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 (edited) I hate the idea of throwing and having a passing game in the top half of the league. What fun would that be? Edited January 15, 2017 by Billsfan1972 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts