Jump to content

Liberal Protests


B-Man

Recommended Posts

Just now, BillStime said:

 

Still waiting for feedback on how Obama fanned the flames and set race relations back to before the '60s?

 

Specific, concrete examples... you know; kinda stuff like THIS:

 

As Americans Shift on Racism, Trump Digs In

 

At Dallas talk on police and race, Trump shrugs off 'bad apples’ and again vows to ‘dominate the streets’

 

The White House took heat for excluding the county’s three top law enforcement officials, who are all black, from an event that at times felt much like a campaign rally, albeit far smaller than usual for Trump

 

This is just one week... such a great uniter-in-chief - right @Buffalogal

 

 

 

 

 

I could have sworn there was an extensive discussion on it last week.  But I wouldn't expect a brain dead hitman to read it.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else been noticing that with each passing day the remaining protestors are looking more and more predominantly white, out of work, bored to death, hyper empathetic, twenty somethings?  This is what happens after the government takes away your job, and tells you to stay inside for three months! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GG said:

 

Correct, and the police chief was referring to the 911 calls, not the police response.   Why would the CHAZ residents start calling the police?

Maybe you're confused. They're calling 911 to get help with crimes. There are armed guards preventing police from entering the CHAZ. Police don't show, so another 911 call is made. All I'm saying is triple the calls doesn't necessarily mean triple the crimes, considering the setup.

3 minutes ago, Jaraxxus said:

They're autonomous.

 

They don't need police response. Let them figure it out on their own. Maybe we'll get lucky and they'll all kill each other.

Agreed. I'm not arguing they should get response, as the lack is directly caused by them. Just pointing out that 3x calls =/= 3x crimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GG said:

 

I could have sworn there was an extensive discussion on it last week.  But I wouldn't expect a brain dead hitman to read it.

 

Awe, GEEGEE - you're pathetic. 

 

@BuffaloGal never backed up her feeeeeelz

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

 

Awe, GEEGEE - you're pathetic. 

 

@BuffaloGal never backed up her feeeeeelz

 

 

Let's get back on topic that you pray at the altar of the people who are responsible for thousands of unnecessary deaths in NYS.

 

Just a snippet of incompetence that led to unneeded death.

 

Quote

Three transfers from Health + Hospitals' Woodhull in Brooklyn came in one night “coding” and in need of resuscitation within 30 minutes of getting there, another Bellevue doctor said. All three died. Under normal protocol, patients on the verge of death are rarely transferred.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Let's get back on topic that you pray at the altar of the people who are responsible for thousands of unnecessary deaths in NYS.

 

Just a snippet of incompetence that led to unneeded death.

 

 

 

deflect much?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

deflect much?

 

Make sure you genuflect when you pray at the altar

 

Quote

The virus has hit New York harder than any other state, cutting through its densely populated urban neighborhoods and devastating the economy. New York state’s death toll of 30,575 accounted for 7% of the world’s deaths and 27% of American deaths as of June 11, according to Johns Hopkins University data.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

Still waiting for feedback on how Obama fanned the flames and set race relations back to before the '60s?

 

Specific, concrete examples... you know; kinda stuff like THIS:

 

As Americans Shift on Racism, Trump Digs In

 

At Dallas talk on police and race, Trump shrugs off 'bad apples’ and again vows to ‘dominate the streets’

 

The White House took heat for excluding the county’s three top law enforcement officials, who are all black, from an event that at times felt much like a campaign rally, albeit far smaller than usual for Trump

 

This is just one week... such a great uniter-in-chief - right @Buffalogal

 

 

 

 

 

 

She won’t respond.  She can spout off the alt-wrong cliches but she can’t back them up with those pesky little things called facts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Let's get back on topic that you pray at the altar of the people who are responsible for thousands of unnecessary deaths in NYS.

 

Just a snippet of incompetence that led to unneeded death.

 

 


I have him on ignore. I'd never know if he mentioned me if he was not quoted (and I saw in another post he tagged someone who was not me). ?
 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, GG said:

 

I could have sworn there was an extensive discussion on it last week.  But I wouldn't expect a brain dead hitman to read it.

 

There was an extensive discussion.  But extensive doesn’t mean complete. And the question about Obama’s active divisiveness remains unanswered.  

 

Of course, the Obama question is a convenient way to distract from the feats of the current president, which involve demonizing protestors, cowering in a bunker when the people seek his voice on an issue of social change, attempting to use the military to squelch free speech with which he disagrees, refusing to stop the veneration of loser, traitorous Confederate military figures at present-day military bases, and effectively beginning his 2020 presidential campaign in the location of the worst racial massacre in United States history.  

 

So spare me your alt-wrong BS about a bunch of snowflakes in Seattle who put up some hamfisted cardboard signs and your conspiracy theories about Antifa, the left, and anything that doesn’t fit your groupthink nonsense about Donald Trump. Reasonable minds can disagree on economic policy, the best means of border security, health care, and other policy questions and still get along.  There is no reasonable mind, however, that can suggest that any inaction on the part of Obama in the racial equality field is equivalent to Donald Trump’s greatest hits in this area.  

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

There was an extensive discussion.  But extensive doesn’t mean complete. And the question about Obama’s active divisiveness remains unanswered.  

 

Of course, the Obama question is a convenient way to distract from the feats of the current president, which involve demonizing protestors, cowering in a bunker when the people seek his voice on an issue of social change, attempting to use the military to squelch free speech with which he disagrees, refusing to stop the veneration of loser, traitorous Confederate military figures at present-day military bases, and effectively beginning his 2020 presidential campaign in the location of the worst racial massacre in United States history.  

 

So spare me your alt-wrong BS about a bunch of snowflakes in Seattle who put up some hamfisted cardboard signs and your conspiracy theories about Antifa, the left, and anything that doesn’t fit your groupthink nonsense about Donald Trump. Reasonable minds can disagree on economic policy, the best means of border security, health care, and other policy questions and still get along.  There is no reasonable mind, however, that can suggest that any inaction on the part of Obama in the racial equality field is equivalent to Donald Trump’s greatest hits in this area.  

 

It remains unanswered by you, because you choose to ignore inconvenient facts.

 

The topic was Obama's inaction, and the current situation is a direct extension of that.  Trump's usual tone deafness on humanity is not relevant to the discussion of the fire that Obama ignited.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GG said:

 

It remains unanswered by you, because you choose to ignore inconvenient facts.

 

The topic was Obama's inaction, and the current situation is a direct extension of that.  Trump's usual tone deafness on humanity is not relevant to the discussion of the fire that Obama ignited.

 

Yeah, sure, it’s Obama’s fault.  Says the guy who has no facts to support his contention that Obama’s actions contributed to this mess and who supports a president doing his best imitation of the “best” of George Wallace and the worst of Richard Nixon. 

 

The term racist is thrown around way too often and too casually in today’s society.  But the position that you take here is one that inches your toward eligibility for that scarlet letter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

Yeah, sure, it’s Obama’s fault.  Says the guy who has no facts to support his contention that Obama’s actions contributed to this mess and who supports a president doing his best imitation of the “best” of George Wallace and the worst of Richard Nixon. 

 

The term racist is thrown around way too often and too casually in today’s society.  But the position that you take here is one that inches your toward eligibility for that scarlet letter.  

 

when everyone is a racist, then nobody is a racist, correct?

 

Please explain how my statements are racist, because you choose to ignore the factual history of the deteriorated race relations between 2009 and 2016?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


I have him on ignore. I'd never know if he mentioned me if he was not quoted (and I saw in another post he tagged someone who was not me). ?
 

 

Ignore me all you want but it is abundantly clear: 

 

You praise Trump because he validates your racism and xenophobia and that is worth everything to you.

Edited by BillStime
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GG said:

 

when everyone is a racist, then nobody is a racist, correct?

 

Please explain how my statements are racist, because you choose to ignore the factual history of the deteriorated race relations between 2009 and 2016?

 

It’s not those statements that are racist.  It’s your hypocrisy and your support for racism and xenophobia that pulls you toward that scarlet letter.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SectionC3 said:

 

It’s not those statements that are racist.  It’s your hypocrisy and your support for racism and xenophobia that pulls you toward that scarlet letter.  

 

 

Such as ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GG said:

 

 

Such as ....

 

You condemn Obama for what you characterize as his inaction on issues of race and refuse to condemn what any reasonable mind would see as the flagrant and obviously inflammatory actions of Donald Trump on the same issue. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SectionC3 said:

 

You condemn Obama for what you characterize as his inaction on issues of race and refuse to condemn what any reasonable mind would see as the flagrant and obviously inflammatory actions of Donald Trump on the same issue. 

 

 

Could it be that the topic was why relations deteriorated between 2009 & 2016?

 

I've been perfectly clear that Trump is missing a humanitarian gene, and most of the time is his own worst enemy, such as now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GG said:

 

Could it be that the topic was why relations deteriorated between 2009 & 2016?

 

I've been perfectly clear that Trump is missing a humanitarian gene, and most of the time is his own worst enemy, such as now.  

 

So go on record.  Are Trump’s actions with respect to this issue worse than Obama’s inactions on the same issue? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...