Jump to content

Your next Bills QB will be...the Sanchise.


Recommended Posts

Here, here! Somebody with some sense. All the posters on here clamoring for Sanchez to be our QB remind me of the defenders of the oil refinery in The Road Warrior when they considered The Humungus' offer of "Give us the gasoline, and I spare your lives. Just walk away." to be believable & reasonable.

 

Mark Sanchez is a washed-out, turnover machine. Keep him away from my Bills.

 

Just sayin'.

Reading comprehension is hard. Nobody is clamoring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I honestly don't even think Sanchez or Mallett are in the equation....
I'd rank it like this depending on if the Bills prefer stability or potential most important.


FA Vets

Campbell (33yrs) - 16,771yds, 81.7 Rating, 60.3%, 1.45:1 td/int, 6.7 avg

Moore (30yrs) - 5342yds, 79.2 rating, 58.9%, 1.18:1 td/int, 7.0 avg
Locker (26yrs) - 4967yds, 79.0 rating, 57.5%, 1.23:1 td/int, 7.0 avg

McCoy (28yrs) - 5458yds, 78.2 rating, 60.3%, 1.09:1 td/int, 6.6 avg

Hoyer (29yrs) - 4557yds, 76.8 rating, 56.5%, 1:1 td/int, 7.2 avg

Ponder (27yrs) - 6658yds, 75.9 rating, 59.8%, 1.06:1 td/int, 6.3 avg

 

It is also possible we trade for a QB under contract

 

Glennon (25yrs) - 4025yds, 83.7 rating, 58.8%, 193:1 td/int, 6.5 avg

 

FAs considered not viable for Bills

Sanchez (28yrs) - 14,510yds, 74.1 rating, 56.3%, 1.03:1 td/int, 6.7 avg

Mallett (26yrs) - 417yds, 61.0 rating, 53.2%, 0.67:1 td/int, 5.3 avg

Gabbert (25yrs) - 4395yds, 66.8 rating, 53.2%, 0.96:1 td/int, 5.6 avg

Claussen (27yrs) - 1781yds, 60.2 rating, 52.7%, 1:2 td/int, 5.1 avg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I honestly don't even think Sanchez or Mallett are in the equation....

I'd rank it like this depending on if the Bills prefer stability or potential most important.

 

FA Vets

Orton (age unimportant) Yards: Multiple Avg: 100% on all passes caught between 2-25 yds TD/INT ratio: Unimportant It Factor: Yes

Campbell (33yrs) - 16,771yds, 81.7 Rating, 60.3%, 1.45:1 td/int, 6.7 avg

Moore (30yrs) - 5342yds, 79.2 rating, 58.9%, 1.18:1 td/int, 7.0 avg
Locker (26yrs) - 4967yds, 79.0 rating, 57.5%, 1.23:1 td/int, 7.0 avg

McCoy (28yrs) - 5458yds, 78.2 rating, 60.3%, 1.09:1 td/int, 6.6 avg

Hoyer (29yrs) - 4557yds, 76.8 rating, 56.5%, 1:1 td/int, 7.2 avg

Ponder (27yrs) - 6658yds, 75.9 rating, 59.8%, 1.06:1 td/int, 6.3 avg

 

It is also possible we trade for a QB under contract

 

Glennon (25yrs) - 4025yds, 83.7 rating, 58.8%, 193:1 td/int, 6.5 avg

 

FAs considered not viable for Bills

Sanchez (28yrs) - 14,510yds, 74.1 rating, 56.3%, 1.03:1 td/int, 6.7 avg

Mallett (26yrs) - 417yds, 61.0 rating, 53.2%, 0.67:1 td/int, 5.3 avg

Gabbert (25yrs) - 4395yds, 66.8 rating, 53.2%, 0.96:1 td/int, 5.6 avg

Claussen (27yrs) - 1781yds, 60.2 rating, 52.7%, 1:2 td/int, 5.1 avg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do we even need a FA QB? Just draft one and build the rest of the team. If you're goingearth_chassis%20ground.jpg& #, then EJ will be just fine.

Rake & hashtag? EJ planning on starting a twitter based gardening blog?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes... I know what you meant...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peace Frog, on 03 Mar 2015 - 12:08 AM, said:snapback.png

Why do we even need a FA QB? Just draft one and build the rest of the team. If you're goingearth_chassis%20ground.jpg& #, then EJ will be just fine.

for those not familiar with the symbols - Ground and Pound ! :beer: well done

THIS is even more true with the signing of Shady (no not Sanchez)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...