Jump to content

Islamic Terrorism


B-Man

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, The_Dude said:

 

I'm not sure I've ever heard Trump mention Pershing. Further, I'm quite sure Trump doesn't know who the man was.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/19/trump-appears-to-endorse-executing-terrorists-citing-questionable-history

34 minutes ago, westside said:

Who's your daddy???

President Trump is!!!!

Lol!!!!!!!

Hey lady 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Does it really matter a century later? I mean  Robin Hood was a pretty good story, wasn't it?

 

Accuracy always matters.

15 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

 

I support executing terrorists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

Accuracy always matters.

 

 

Except nuclear weapons.  

 

34 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

I support executing terrorists.

 

And when the Jacobins take power and outlaw your hate speech as stochastic terrorism, will you support your own execution?  

 

Careful what you wish for.

 

(And yes, "stochastic terrorism" is a real team.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

And when the Jacobins take power and outlaw your hate speech as stochastic terrorism, will you support your own execution?  

 

Careful what you wish for.

 

(And yes, "stochastic terrorism" is a real team.)

 

This aint France. And it is my belief that the reason we cant get arrested for Tweets like the French can is because our 1st is backed by our 2nd. 

Edited by The_Dude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

This aint France. And it is my belief that the reason we cant get arrested for Tweets like the French can is because our 1st is backed by our 2nd. 

 

This ain't France...but the Democrats certainly bear much more than a passing resemblance to the Jacobins.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

This ain't France...but the Democrats certainly bear much more than a passing resemblance to the Jacobins.

 

I've seen a liberal news source called "the Jacobins." 

 

It's like they stopped reading after the Tennis Court oath. It's like they didn't learn a damn thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

The Obama administration decided not to call this a terror attack or count it as one soon afterward, even though Nolen, a prison convert to Islam, had filled his Facebook page with hideous ISIS propaganda and openly praised the death cult’s rise to global prominence through constant blood-letting. Nolen had just been suspended after co-workers rejected his Islamist proselytizing and demands for religious accommodations at Vaughan Foods. This gave those already predisposed to downplay Islamic terror attacks the excuse needed to suggest workplace violence and mental illness was somehow at play, instead of the prima facie terror attack it was.

 

More at the link:

 

And the Obama Administration was entirely correct, since the only evidence making this a "terror attack" was that he had converted to Islam.

 

Identity does not make a crime "terrorism."  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

And the Obama Administration was entirely correct, since the only evidence making this a "terror attack" was that he had converted to Islam.

 

Identity does not make a crime "terrorism."  

Shouting Alluah Akbar isn't a bit of a hint that it's a terrorist attack?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

No.

 

Learn some Arabic.  See how common the use of the phrase is in everyday conversation.

Allahu Akbar means "God is greater" or God is "greatest". It can be used as a greeting, a farewell or simply a proclamation of faith. If a certain punctuation that sounds like BANG, BANG is heard along with that phrase then one might conclude that the person yelling Allahu Akbar, along with shooting people, thinks there is a correlation between the two. So, I guess if the shooter thinks he's simultaneously praising his God while shooting people, the shooter himself believes that taken in its total, his deeds have a connection to his religion. So, praising God while shooting people would most likely make any thinking person believe that he was a religious terrorist. Praising Allah while shooting people would further define his actions as Islamic terrorism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Must be very useful in the silver mines, eh?

 

IEDs. Back before we learned we’d keep convoys not at set distances. Ie, 50 meters between trucks. 

 

Haj would set up a stake about 50 meters from the IED and a stick at the IED. 

 

First truck goes by and they count their “Allah Akbars.” If it’s 3, then when the second truck goes by Haj counts 3 Allah Albars and then WHAMMY. 

Edited by The_Dude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

IEDs. Back before we learned we’d keep convoys not at set distances. Ie, 50 meters between trucks. 

 

Haj would set up a stake about 50 meters from the IED and a stick at the IED. 

 

First truck goes by and they count their “Allah Akbars.” If it’s 3, then when the second truck goes by Haj counts 3 Allah Albars and then WHAMMY. 

 

In other words, it's equivalent to "Mississippi."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...