Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

10B sounds like a lot. Thanks for nothing, people that were in charge during the Brandon administration.
 

Whoever you were. 

Does it even cost anything when climate science is involved?  You can't put a price tag on this sort of $10,000,000,000 program, can you?  

  • Replies 7.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
25 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

10B sounds like a lot. Thanks for nothing, people that were in charge during the Brandon administration.
 

Whoever you were. 

But billionaires don't pay enough taxes!!!!! Yes let's give these idiots more money!

Posted (edited)

Kwame: Children are important to everyone.


Captain Planet: And whether families have sons or daughters, they should be equally proud.


Wheeler: Remember that the Earth's resources are limited.


Linka: You do not need to have a big family.


Ma-Ti: Because all the world's people are your brothers and sisters.


Captain Planet: The power is yours!

 

Second Planeteer Alert

 

Captain Planet: Did you know the population of the world is now more than 5 billion?


Ma-Ti: Wow. That is a lot of people!
Gi: And it's increasing by 90 million people each year.


Kwame: But the earth is not getting any bigger.


Linka: So when it is your turn to have a family...


Wheeler: Keep it small.


Captain Planet: The more people there are, the more pressure we put on our planet. So take it easy on our earth and conserve what you can. The power is yours!

 


 

 

 

Climate change cult.  Trying population control for decades.  Commie trash.  

How many years left do we have now?  
 

Edited by Big Blitz
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

I’VE GOT A ROPE THAT COURT CAN GO PISS UP:  

 

59cca178-6ebd-4a06-af52-14d34df8c533-105

 

 

UN’s Top Court Says Failure to Stop Climate Change Violates International Law.

 

Dmitri Bolt 

 

The United Nations' top court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), just announced that if countries fail to take measures to protect the planet from climate change, they could violate international law. The court also said that countries "harmed" by climate change could be entitled to reparations on a "case by case" basis, according to the Associated Press.

 

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/dmitri-bolt/2025/07/23/uns-top-court-says-failure-to-stop-climate-change-violates-international-law-n2660827

 

https://apnews.com/article/un-court-opinion-climate-change-1ac84a94a5aaffd63518ef1da3502a9e

 

 

 

 

 

 

UN out of the US. US out of the UN.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

I’VE GOT A ROPE THAT COURT CAN GO PISS UP:  

 

59cca178-6ebd-4a06-af52-14d34df8c533-105

 

 

UN’s Top Court Says Failure to Stop Climate Change Violates International Law.

 

Dmitri Bolt 

 

The United Nations' top court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), just announced that if countries fail to take measures to protect the planet from climate change, they could violate international law. The court also said that countries "harmed" by climate change could be entitled to reparations on a "case by case" basis, according to the Associated Press.

 

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/dmitri-bolt/2025/07/23/uns-top-court-says-failure-to-stop-climate-change-violates-international-law-n2660827

 

https://apnews.com/article/un-court-opinion-climate-change-1ac84a94a5aaffd63518ef1da3502a9e

 

 

 

 

 

 

UN out of the US. US out of the UN.

 

 

 

 

4 things.

 

1.  If a country decides not to abide by a ruling of the ICJ, the matter for how to resolve the issue goes before the Security Council.  The US has a veto on the Security Council.  So, for all effective purpose, the US only has to abide by rulings of the ICJ when it sees fit.

 

2.  If the US withdraws from the UN, it loses its permanent seat on the SC and also its veto power on the SC.

 

3.  The SC can not only force a member country to accept the ICJ's rulings, it can also enforce police actions against countries.

 

4.  The US should NEVER withdraw from the UN nor miss a session of the SC.  (The Soviets learned the hard way why you don't want to miss a SC vote back when North Korea invaded South Korea.)

Edited by Taro T
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

The Trump administration is acting to overturn a key 2009 Environmental Protection Agency finding used to justify most federal government regulations regarding climate change.

 

The EPA has crafted a proposal that would undo the government's "endangerment finding", a determination that pollutants from burning fossil fuels, such as carbon dioxide and methane, can be regulated under the Clean Air Act. The finding has long served as the foundation for a host of policies and rules to address climate change. The EPA's proposal to revoke the finding is currently under review by the White House Office of Management and Budget.

 

Then, in 2009 during the Obama administration, the EPA declared greenhouse gases in the atmosphere were a hazard to people. 

 

Finally, the EPA's climate target requires a 55% reduction in US greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and net-zero emissions by 2050.  This is, of course, an impossible task using existing technology.  Green energy alternatives are nowhere near efficient enough to replace oil, coal and natural gas.  The cost would be immense and any future industrial efforts by the US would be crippled. 

 

Furthermore, pervasive cuts would have to be made to the base consumption of food and energy, leading to economic suicide.  Climate control advocates argue that the global population will have to be reduced dramatically to achieve the net zero agenda. 

 

The claim that the Earth is the hottest humans have ever recorded is false.  This is based on "officially recorded" weather records which started in the late-1800s.  This is a tiny window in the weather history of the Earth.  If we look at the longer term temperature pattern it becomes clear that we are actually living in one of the coldest periods on the planet in the past 500 million years.

 

Trump's reversal of EPA standards and deregulation will help the US economy.  More importantly, it starts the much needed process of removing climate change brainwashing from the federal government's vernacular. 

 

It's time for western civilization to abandon the climate hoax and move on.  

 

 

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-epa-remove-greenhouse-gases-list-dangerous-pollutants

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
On 5/12/2023 at 2:47 PM, Tommy Callahan said:

yeah. its the first time I read the major news talk about cloud seeding on a massive scale to impact the climate.

 

by releasing aluminum aerosol into the atmosphere.

 

 



 

 

 

Posted
On 7/18/2025 at 10:14 AM, Big Blitz said:

Kwame: Children are important to everyone.


Captain Planet: And whether families have sons or daughters, they should be equally proud.


Wheeler: Remember that the Earth's resources are limited.


Linka: You do not need to have a big family.


Ma-Ti: Because all the world's people are your brothers and sisters.


Captain Planet: The power is yours!

 

Second Planeteer Alert

 

Captain Planet: Did you know the population of the world is now more than 5 billion?


Ma-Ti: Wow. That is a lot of people!
Gi: And it's increasing by 90 million people each year.


Kwame: But the earth is not getting any bigger.


Linka: So when it is your turn to have a family...


Wheeler: Keep it small.


Captain Planet: The more people there are, the more pressure we put on our planet. So take it easy on our earth and conserve what you can. The power is yours!

 


 

 

 

Climate change cult.  Trying population control for decades.  Commie trash.  

How many years left do we have now?  
 

Good Lord, what drivel. 

×
×
  • Create New...