Jump to content

Northwestern Football Team attempting to Unionize


boyst

Recommended Posts

Paying a football or basketball team is a great idea. They elevate the schools profile. But what about the cross country team? Cheerleaders? Gymnasts? Wrestlers? They should be just as deserving.

 

 

and even so, a HUGE portion of the football and basketball run deficits as it is. there are a lot of effects that will ripple through the actual student body if you are forced to pay athletes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

 

and even so, a HUGE portion of the football and basketball run deficits as it is. there are a lot of effects that will ripple through the actual student body if you are forced to pay athletes.

the million dollar coaches. The training staff. The equient to be competitive. Then over head. Its costly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the million dollar coaches. The training staff. The equient to be competitive. Then over head. Its costly

 

and once you get out of the top 40 programs, how many are really booming? everyone pictures LSU and forgets Tulane, ULL etc.... are all D1 schools too(as an example local to me), not to mention D2 or 3 schools. do only SEC, PAC 10, Big 10, Big 12, and ACC football and basketball players get paid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

and once you get out of the top 40 programs, how many are really booming? everyone pictures LSU and forgets Tulane, ULL etc.... are all D1 schools too(as an example local to me), not to mention D2 or 3 schools. do only SEC, PAC 10, Big 10, Big 12, and ACC football and basketball players get paid?

 

It happens everywhere. This is what happens when the haves hoard too much than the have nots. The have nots get restless and invoke change. NU is flush with cash and players want a cut for the part they play.

Edited by ExiledInIllinois
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

It happens everywhere. This is what happens when the haves hoard too much than the have nots. The have nots get restless and invoke change. NU is flush with cash and players want a cut for the part they play.

in what world should a student make more the. a professor while "employed" by the same institution?

 

This is not a case of the have nots/haves. The haves are the top 2% of the NCAAF and NCAAB programs who get free rental cars, homes, apartments, swag, gifts etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

in what world should a student make more the. a professor while "employed" by the same institution?

 

This is not a case of the have nots/haves. The haves are the top 2% of the NCAAF and NCAAB programs who get free rental cars, homes, apartments, swag, gifts etc.

 

In a world where the market bears it. Does the student/player do more @ bringing in people? Making a name for the institution?

Edited by ExiledInIllinois
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

In a world where the market bears it. Does the student/player do more @ bringing in people? Making a name for the institution?

lets make this fun. The less then 1% of the college athletes you've heard of do more for the school then the professor or TA? The Right Guard to the 2003 USC football team is doing what today? Or kicker to the NIU 1998 football team? Or the 6th man to the Boise State basketball team? Those players bring nothing to the team. The Tyler Haynesboro, Matt Lienert, JaDavon Clowney, etc do. The tiny fraction of successful student athletes help us know where schools like Marshall play, or Florida Atlantic, or Wake Forrest, etc. We wouldn't know Baylor from Catawba if not for a few "star" players. We would guess St Bonaventure is a church not a school

 

My point is that these statements are made when only considering maybe 80 NCAA athletes. Not the likely 80,000 there actually are in D1,2, 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

in what world should a student make more the. a professor while "employed" by the same institution?

 

This is not a case of the have nots/haves. The haves are the top 2% of the NCAAF and NCAAB programs who get free rental cars, homes, apartments, swag, gifts etc.

They're also governed by a ton of unfair rules that hamstring them so the University can reap the benefits. If the rules were even close to being fair, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

 

Anytime the pendulum swings too far in one direction, something is going to happen. Here we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they being paid to play or get an education? The NCAA has let this get way out of control by allowing schools to field "teams" that otherwise have no business attending their respective schools. Zero academic standards, zero expectations, just win one for the alumni!

 

If they want to work "for pay" get a job and forget the education sham.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they being paid to play or get an education? The NCAA has let this get way out of control by allowing schools to field "teams" that otherwise have no business attending their respective schools. Zero academic standards, zero expectations, just win one for the alumni!

 

If they want to work "for pay" get a job and forget the education sham.

 

This is a key point. Allowing a barely literate kid into your institution of higher learning would seem to indicate that he's there for a different purpose than the kids who had to meet minimum academic qualifications.

 

Personally, I'd love to see the NCAA outlaw preferential admissions standards for athletes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a key point. Allowing a barely literate kid into your institution of higher learning would seem to indicate that he's there for a different purpose than the kids who had to meet minimum academic qualifications.

 

Personally, I'd love to see the NCAA outlaw preferential admissions standards for athletes.

Good point.

 

Not to draw a parallel to Penn State but the NCAA really does have to get its head on straight. They are responsible for student athletes playing their respective sports and have nothing to do with the academic policy. The NCAA need only concern itself with the student athlete's sport. They do not and should not be involved in any academic responsibilities as it is futile. To require a minimum GPA to a student athlete is pointless because anyone can get an A in underwater basketweaving.

 

The NCAA, Title IX, all of these things meant to improve the life of the student athlete hurt them further down the line and jeopardize the quality and opportunity of education on the non-student athlete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NLRB are noting but Political hacks. Maybe they need to go back to school...unpaid of course!

 

Obviously the Academic component of student athletes is being overlooked. From a Union standpoint, ALL unions not only advocate pay & benefits, but also job security AND Longevity. IF there would be a union; how long would it take to negotiate a contract, would the schools be representing their players or themselves, would we see 6-7-8 year players, what would the dues schedule look like, could a union member be traded (transfer) to a non-union school, would that player then be called a scab, is graduation the equivalent of retirement, could a player ever come out of retirement?????

 

An Alumni union may make more sense were it not for the fact that, in many cases, they're the ones who started the entire pay for play problem. :doh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be fun when they find out that, if college-athletes are employees, that scholarships and related items can then be classified as "income" and "benefits", making them subject to federal and state income taxes.

 

Also, by having "income", this makes these students ineligible for other financial aid such as Pell Grants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...