SDS Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 His candor Were you trying not to tip your hand when stated "lack of candor" then or was it a misdirection? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abqmarko Posted January 1, 2013 Author Share Posted January 1, 2013 "....things work for them" could've been the missing fragment. Also you have it worded as "and hopefully...." In the op and "but hopefully...." here - FYI. And it's either he's an idiot or genius. Agree completely...i hope for the genius side!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 Every year comes with a "Welcome to the offseason" post. This is it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fan in Chicago Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 (edited) Oh please relax...the salaries that these middle tier coaches get it not that different. We are not talking about Saban, Gruden, Shanahan, Cowher, or even Andy Reid for that matter. Those coaches choose you and tell you how much you are going to pay them. Grimm, Whisenhunt, Louvie, and even a few of these coordiantors will be lucky to get a HC interview. Do you think the DC for the cardinals is the highest priority for all the teams searching for HC's??? IMHO, Lovie will get quite a few interviews and not just to satisfy the Rooney requirement. He has been fairly stable here in Chicago and has suffered through years of an inconsistent roster. His major failing is not having a good OC under him (Cutler leading a Martz offense !!!). But time will tell how much interest Lovie generates. Edited January 1, 2013 by Fan in Chicago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abqmarko Posted January 1, 2013 Author Share Posted January 1, 2013 Were you trying not to tip your hand when stated "lack of candor" then or was it a misdirection? it was a lingering hangover but i think you get my point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 it was a lingering hangover but i think you get my point Yes, just no one agrees with it yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RealityCheck Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 I think the OP should stick to stenography. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 I think the OP should stick to stenography. Negative. He has the quote transcribed two different ways already.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abqmarko Posted January 1, 2013 Author Share Posted January 1, 2013 Yes, just no one agrees with it yet. If those guys are hired then id say he's out of his league...if you think it bodes well that a GM prematurley puts it out there then go for it....again IF they are hired hold those statments for the press conference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 If those guys are hired then id say he's out of his league...if you think it bodes well that a GM prematurley puts it out there then go for it....again IF they are hired hold those statments for the press conference. Cause it's a secret that they are interested if they proceed to interview them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RealityCheck Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 Nobody listens to Whaley anyway. He is just an assistant pimp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted January 1, 2013 Share Posted January 1, 2013 Cause it's a secret that they are interested if they proceed to interview them? Yeah, but you don't understand. He said the word hopefully and then paused. You're clearly not a legal man with a highly developed knowledge of statements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 (edited) Yeah, but you don't understand. He said the word hopefully and then paused. You're clearly not a legal man with a highly developed knowledge of statements. I don't appreciate your candor... Or lack of candor.... or.... Or whatever Edited January 2, 2013 by NoSaint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abqmarko Posted January 2, 2013 Author Share Posted January 2, 2013 (edited) I don't appreciate your candor... Or lack of candor.... or.... Or whatever Well WGR already pulled the article i quoted (someone please pull it up) so i guess we will se if the AZ D coordiantor is hired as the next coach.... if so you can buy me the next 5000 wings and if thats the case Whaley also should not have been opening his mouth...then again maybe you are used to the last 13 years and used to putting up with a horrible product Edited January 2, 2013 by abqmarko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 Its gonna be a looooong offseason... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meathead Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 not to pile on, but the op was bad in so many ways first of all, im not one to usually demand proper english, but it was so bad i had a helluva time even understanding what you said. you work in the legal profession, doing what, washing windows? holy hell second, you quote a person in some article and you dont link the article or tell us what event those comments came from. not only is that awful message board ettiquite, you are basing a premise on something we cant find context in without doing some work to go find it, if we even can. its unfair the the target of your point, its rude to the posters trying to follow along, its just all bad third, well the point does seem weak, but any chance you had a valid one was torpedoed by one and two above theres a minimum standard to posting and god i wish some of the people around here would understand that sometimes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FitzShowUsYourTitz Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 I say we burn the OP at the stake, then stone him. No....I say we stone him and then burn him at the stake!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buftex Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 I say we burn the OP at the stake, then stone him. No....I say we stone him and then burn him at the stake!!! Not sure that will help. Im stoned and this thread still doesnt make any sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abqmarko Posted January 2, 2013 Author Share Posted January 2, 2013 ok ok im learning the etiquette-1st post (probably last) but i will say if we do hire the AZ D coordinator then I stand by my original post Whaley should not be making those types of statements...what people are overlooking is that article that i referred to was removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts