Jump to content

Electric cars might not be so eco-friendly after all


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Wait, Soledad O'Brien is not a liberal hack? LOL!

 

Uh, no. She destroys Democrats as well as Republicans. Step away from Fox and maybe you will see that those who conduct brutal interviews of Republicans can be fair journalists. She ain't perfect, but up there with some of the best interviewers.

 

I'd love to hear who you think is "fair." Fox & Friends? The greatest fraud on TV.

Edited by Max Fischer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh, no. She destroys Democrats as well as Republicans. Step away from Fox and maybe you will see that those who conduct brutal interviews of Republicans can be fair journalists. She ain't perfect, but up there with some of the best interviewers.

 

I'd love to hear who you think is "fair." Fox & Friends? The fraud on TV.

 

Sorry Maxi,

 

You are the one who is incorrect. It has nothing to do with Fox. O'Brien has been demonstrated as a liberal hack time and time again

 

No matter how many times you claim otherwise.

 

Of course, you could name all these dems that she "destroyed"

 

but you can't.

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Uh, no. She destroys Democrats as well as Republicans. Step away from Fox and maybe you will see that those who conduct brutal interviews of Republicans can be fair journalists. She ain't perfect, but up there with some of the best interviewers.

 

I'd love to hear who you think is "fair." Fox & Friends? The greatest fraud on TV.

 

Just as bad as MSNBC.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry Maxi,

 

You are the one who is incorrect. It has nothing to do with Fox. O'Brien has been demonstrated as a liberal hack time and time again

 

No matter how many times you claim otherwise.

 

Of course, you could name all these dems that she "destroyed"

 

but you can't.

 

 

And who has "demonstrated" her bias, oh yeah, Fox News and other conservative media outlets. Nice try.

 

If you expanded your worldview just a bit, you will know that she was recently criticized by the left for going after David Axelrod and Governor Markell. Guess you won't get that fair and balanced coverage.

 

 

Just as bad as MSNBC.

 

What is?

Edited by Max Fischer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And who has "demonstrated" her bias, oh yeah, Fox News and other conservative media outlets. Nice try.

Wow dude, you bring the hammer down on Faux Snooze for their bias but turn a blind eye towards everyone else You're either a shill or a useful idiot

Edited by /dev/null
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And who has "demonstrated" her bias, oh yeah, Fox News and other conservative media outlets. Nice try.

 

If you expanded your worldview just a bit, you will know that she was recently criticized by the left for going after David Axelrod and Governor Markell. Guess you won't get that fair and balanced coverage.

 

What is?

 

Of course, the point of all this was to discuss the better, more informative reporters. Still waiting to hear if anyone has better options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow dude, you bring the hammer down on Faux Snooze for their bias but turn a blind eye towards everyone else You're either a shill or a useful idiot

 

I just called out a half-dozen or more by name. You, one. Bair. Wow.

 

As proved by his non-response to me,

 

 

he's both.

 

 

.

 

I just put up a few names. You: ZERO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just called out a half-dozen or more by name. You, one. Bair. Wow.

 

 

 

I just put up a few names. You: ZERO.

 

A half dozen or more byy name so you say

Pardon me and my Western Pennsylvania roots clinging to my guns 'n religion.

But can you re-idioterate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I just put up a few names. You: ZERO.

 

Oh, sorry, I was waiting to see if you would quote your own post again.........lol

 

You see Maxi, here's how it works with adults, I didn't claim anything, so I do not have to "name names"..........

 

You held up a well known Obama apologist for your idea of an outstanding fair reporter

 

and we laughed at you.

 

Your only response to us was to then criticize Fox news.

 

The next point you make.............................will be the first point you make...............

 

 

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh, no. She destroys Democrats as well as Republicans. Step away from Fox and maybe you will see that those who conduct brutal interviews of Republicans can be fair journalists. She ain't perfect, but up there with some of the best interviewers.

 

I'd love to hear who you think is "fair." Fox & Friends? The greatest fraud on TV.

I don't think any of them are unbiased. And I'd also like to know what Democrat, much less Democrats, she's destroyed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Max, and whoever else thinks the "green" thing is a worthy idea:

The problem here has not been the motive, once again, the problem has been the methods. And, once again, when reasonable people identify problems with the methods, the usual assclowns call them evil, and say they hate the motive. :wallbash:

 

Why is it so hard to stick to a discussion of the methods? What is this need to turn everything into a character assassination? What does talk radio have to do awful methods/execution? What does it have to do with the obvious corruption here? If talk radio didn't exist...would that mean Solyndra wouldn't have failed? :lol:

 

However, if Al Gore didn't exist, or the rest of the scumbags involved, the green agenda would not being set back as far as it has been, and there's a good chance that a few venture capital companies would have put out a few reasonable products by now.

 

Just for fun, do you want me to call up the VCs or investment bankers I know, and see if any will even consider "green" company? Notice anything about this election vs. last one? "Green" is now a political liability. No debate questions about "Global Warming" are there?

 

That's because, for far too many people, "green" was never the motive, and was actually a method. That cat is out of the bag.

 

How? Some of the people who are telling you that they are green...are actually red. Green is merely a convenient way of taking yet another shot at getting their awful socialist ideas implemented. They couldn't care less if we all had to ride tricycles, or were driving SUVs, as long as their agenda is advanced.

 

Meanwhile, you are left asking where the F is your green car? Get in line. You'll get your green car, right after I get my flying one. The VCs will tell both of us to get lost...until we can bring them a viable set of methods, and a business plan that actually has a chance of earning enough, never mind staying alive, long enough to be sold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...