beerme1 Posted September 26, 2010 Posted September 26, 2010 I am noticing he is always on the sideline and at the home opener it was maddening. Get him on the field.
rackemrack Posted September 26, 2010 Posted September 26, 2010 in chan's defense kyle williams played a great game today
vincec Posted September 26, 2010 Posted September 26, 2010 The Bills played most of the game today in their 4-2-5 nickel. Troup is not in that package.
jack_spikes Posted September 26, 2010 Posted September 26, 2010 How about Carrington and Moates too. Can't do any worse than Kelsay and Maybin. The Bills organization sucks, and it starts with Wilson.
rackemrack Posted September 26, 2010 Posted September 26, 2010 i do agree however that carrington should be on the field more
JPS Posted September 26, 2010 Posted September 26, 2010 How about play Troupe for Stroud. For a team with limited talent going in, I have to think your 2nd and 3rd rounders should be on the field more.
GR8PRKN Posted September 26, 2010 Posted September 26, 2010 On 9/26/2010 at 11:19 PM, vincec said: The Bills played most of the game today in their 4-2-5 nickel. Troup is not in that package. Agreed .... he did play some but Kyle seems to be coming around and they really like him
beerme1 Posted September 26, 2010 Author Posted September 26, 2010 On 9/26/2010 at 11:25 PM, JPS said: How about play Troupe for Stroud. For a team with limited talent going in, I have to think your 2nd and 3rd rounders should be on the field more. Marcus has been invisible.
Dr. Trooth Posted September 26, 2010 Posted September 26, 2010 Troup is a 'run stopper'. why would the bills need a run stopper against the Patriots?
Red Posted September 26, 2010 Posted September 26, 2010 I was wondering this today,myself. Carrington is another good point. Kelsay just should not be on the field NOR in a Bills uni anymore. But I hope this is a sign of things to come, as he was playing on the D-line today. I was worried that a surgeon like Brady would carve Kelsay a new arse.
dpberr Posted September 26, 2010 Posted September 26, 2010 Now that the offense has *somewhat* been figured out with today's showing, the defense scheme confuses the hell out of me. I have no idea why guys like Troup, Carrington, Moats or even McCargo are not even given a shot to show something and see if they can get a pass rush started. I know Stroud is a name, but he's awful in the 3-4.
papazoid Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 because Troupe has been getting knocked back.... he's not ready.
dayman Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 we need to do something on DL what is there to lose? Start rotating these guys
DE Bills Fan Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 On 9/26/2010 at 11:19 PM, rackemrack said: in chan's defense kyle williams played a great game today WHAT!!!! Are you serious??????????? The Bills were awful vs. the run today and had NO pass rush. Williams is doing the best he can, but he is a marginal NFL player and always will be. Where is Tropue? He can't do any worse. And bring Mpates and Carrington as well
Sisyphean Bills Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 On 9/26/2010 at 11:44 PM, dpberr said: Now that the offense has *somewhat* been figured out with today's showing, the defense scheme confuses the hell out of me. I have no idea why guys like Troup, Carrington, Moats or even McCargo are not even given a shot to show something and see if they can get a pass rush started. I know Stroud is a name, but he's awful in the 3-4. A 4-2-5 with 2 safeties playing LB? Why the confusion?
Chalkie Gerzowski Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 They're saving the rookies for Los Angeles.
NaPolian8693 Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 The Bills don't play any of the players they draft. Here's round 2 through 7: Troup Carrington Easley Wang Moats Batten Brown Calloway I mean how many of these guys even dress, let alone make a play?
McBeane Posted September 27, 2010 Posted September 27, 2010 (edited) Dear 50% of TSW, It's spelled T-R-O-U-P There is no "E." There never will be an "E." Sincerely, SpillerTime21 Edited September 27, 2010 by SpillerTime21
Recommended Posts