/dev/null Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 Conner, you'd be smarter if you just did crack instead. I remember those "This is your brain on drugs" commercials that were supposed to scare kids away from drugs In conner's case, scrambled eggs is an improvement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 I remember those "This is your brain on drugs" commercials that were supposed to scare kids away from drugs In conner's case, scrambled eggs is an improvement He brings new meaning to the term "brain food". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted July 24, 2010 Author Share Posted July 24, 2010 Sure MSNBC is pretty bad also. I don't trust them very much either. Once in a while Maddow has a home-run segment or something. But I've long ago stopped trusting that station to be regularly accurate. That "I hope he fails" thing by Limbaugh is the least inciting thing that guy has ever said. He's not even a political commentator he's just a side show entertainer. Come on he's gone on record for saying the President is not a United States citizen. That's just funny. Joe Wilsons "you lie" statement was a lie. Check your facts. Goodness, I'm sorry I can't spend my life debunking every crazy thing you think. Suffice to say, you suck at doing your own research. This is like playing home run derby. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_C._Wilson Insert foot to mouth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 This is like playing home run derby. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_C._Wilson Insert foot to mouth My bad, that was before I followed politics. That reference (obviously) did not ring a bell. Anyways what is up with this line in the wikipedia article On March 7, 2003, 11 days before the United States-led coalition invasion of Iraq, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) released its report determining that documents indirectly cited by President Bush as suggesting that Iraq had tried to buy 500 tons of uranium from Niger were actually "obvious" forgeries.[30] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 My bad, that was before I followed politics. That reference (obviously) did not ring a bell. Anyways what is up with this line in the wikipedia article Wikipedia That's almost as credible as a Powerpoint® presentation! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booster4324 Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 wikipedia The horror! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 My bad, that was before I followed politics. That reference (obviously) did not ring a bell. Anyways what is up with this line in the wikipedia article Conner, piling on himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 Sure MSNBC is pretty bad also. I don't trust them very much either. Then why don't you link to any of their "lies"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 Then why don't you link to any of their "lies"? Yeah it's hard, they are just stupid little misleading things that make you go "WTF, why did they do that?" Example: Check out this bar graph from Maddow - http://imgur.com/2HJcB.png 994 Billion is about 1/3 of 2.8 Trillion. But if you just were to look at the graph itself and not the numbers, you would think much differently. It's stupid, I don't know why they felt the need to make such a stupid graph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 Yeah it's hard, they are just stupid little misleading things that make you go "WTF, why did they do that?" Example: Check out this bar graph from Maddow - http://imgur.com/2HJcB.png 994 Billion is about 1/3 of 2.8 Trillion. But if you just were to look at the graph itself and not the numbers, you would think much differently. It's stupid, I don't know why they felt the need to make such a stupid graph. Most of the global warming **** you reference is full of nonsense like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattM Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 I love the way you guys just call people who you disagree with a lying liar (usually in a shrill tone) without ever burdening yourself as to cite any of these egregious lies to which you so often refer. But apparently if you're a left-wing liberal who fronts as an objective journalist, but instead skews the News to further a political agenda rather than inform the public you're a beacon of honesty and integrity. Nice. Kind of like Andrew Breitbart, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Yeah it's hard, they are just stupid little misleading things that make you go "WTF, why did they do that?" Example: Check out this bar graph from Maddow - http://imgur.com/2HJcB.png 994 Billion is about 1/3 of 2.8 Trillion. But if you just were to look at the graph itself and not the numbers, you would think much differently. It's stupid, I don't know why they felt the need to make such a stupid graph. So when MSNBC does it they're stupid little misleading things but when Fox does it they're lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob's House Posted July 25, 2010 Author Share Posted July 25, 2010 Kind of like Andrew Breitbart, right? It is interesting to me that garbage like this has been done to people on the right for years without so much as a peep when the truth comes out, but when it happens to someone on the left (and the WH makes fools of themselves with a knee jerk reaction) it's front page news for days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drnykterstein Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 So when MSNBC does it they're stupid little misleading things but when Fox does it they're lies. You know, it's tough I didn't think it was "make a new thread calling out MSNBC" worthy. For comparison Fox news has done some weird, and really wrong charts also. But I think all of those above and also Maddows graph just pale in comparison to an obvious and underhanded lie such as this thing that they've done repeatedly. http://crooksandliars.com/logan-murphy/sho...ls-disgraced-re What I mean to say is: They both suck ass, and they both care far more about ratings than they do truth and accuracy of information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 You know, it's tough I didn't think it was "make a new thread calling out MSNBC" worthy. Of course you didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts