Russ 'Em Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 So the draft is over and most media outlets are complaining that we didn't address our LT or QB needs in the first 4 rounds. Jared Gaither and Jamal Brown have been bandied around in the media and on this board as possible options for the Bills need. This however isn't going to happen. Jared Gaither, chronic foot injuries aside, is in the same mold of the guy we traded to the Eagles. He was drafted in the later rounds and turned into a starting caliber LT. He slipped that far because of his work ethic, unlike Peters who was a tight end. He got into a good system and was coached up to become a good young LT in this league. However, Baltimore must have saw some deficiency in his play that necessitated them picking a LT in the First round last year. A guy the Bills passed on. Brown was out all last season with a back injury. He is 29. He would be a stop gap for a couple years and it would be a risk paying him FA LT money when he didn't play ball last year. Our offense seems to have some holes that will need to be addressed, there is no denying that. But our defense might have had the tougher task going into this offseason. Few teams have had success in switching from a 4-3 to a 3-4 in one year. We have alot of promising young talent on that side of the ball and we added more. I think Chan was trying to make that switch as easy as possible for the team. that's why they went out and stacked up on DEs and LBs. You can never have enough of either one in this system. Obviously they are going to run some hybrid defenses throughout the course of the game, but now that they have the needed talent in place they can be as confident as possible that there defense will not be the weak unit. As I see it Nix is thinking this will be a 2 year "rebuilding" process. In quotes because obviously these guys will need to show improvement over last years debacle. In saying this I think that the HC and GM decided that Chan could coach up what he has on the offensive side of the ball this year. Waiting until next year to draft or bring in the starting LT and hopefully Qb of the future. We drafted some adequate backup line man in calloway and Wang and if they can shine in whatever action they get this year, who knows, diamonds in the rough. By all accounts next years Qb class will be ripe for the picking and I'm sure a LT prospect or 3 will rise above the rest of the comp. This year is going to be about toughness, mental and physical, and who is going to be around for the rebuilding process. We have I think, the most rookie FA signed of any team this year. Our draft was made up of character, self motivated guys. Let the auditions for the Superbowl run of 2012 begin! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAmBuddyNix Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 I agree with most of what you said. I think people freaking out that we didn't draft an LT or QB early in the draft would be replaced by people freaking out that we didn't get pieces for the 3-4 or any playmakers. Bad teams aren't going to fix all of their needs in one draft, I really hope we can get Gaither or Brown at a reasonable price, gives us one less need for next year. Nix and co. want to see what the QB's have to offer(Especially Brohm, considering we know the least about him) and then see if we can land one of the big four QB's in next April's draft(Locker, Luck, Ponder, Mallett). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RealityCheck Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 Truth is always stranger than fiction. QBs and LTs do in fact grow on trees. Super Bowl caliber QBs and LTs do not. It will take a little time for the opportunity to get such players on our roster presents itself. During the draft none of the players available at either position impressed me more than any other at the same position. As far as trading for a LT right now I see no reason to over spend in terms of next years draft picks. Brown and Gaither are not worth next years second in my opinion. The Ravens have foolishly advertised that Gaither has motivation issues. Not a good way to begin trade talks when your looking for a 1st or 2nd round pick in return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabe Northern Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 Few teams have had success in switching from a 4-3 to a 3-4 in one year. We have alot of promising young talent on that side of the ball and we added more. I think Chan was trying to make that switch as easy as possible for the team. that's why they went out and stacked up on DEs and LBs. You can never have enough of either one in this system. Obviously they are going to run some hybrid defenses throughout the course of the game, but now that they have the needed talent in place they can be as confident as possible that there defense will not be the weak unit. While it might not be the "weak unit," people need to tone down their expectations for this D. We have zero OLBs on the roster. Kawicka moved inside. Maybin might work at OLB but was so clueless last year they had Bryan Scott play over him. I don't see how Kelsay makes the switch. Ditto for Ellis. That leaves Schobel, who doesn't look like he's coming back unless he gets some kind of Favre/Roger Clemens type deal, which isn't happening. So who's going to start? Maybin and hopefully, a converted DEs we drafted in the 6th round. I have high hopes for Batten (and Moats, who should be moved outside) but that's scary as hell. Then consider that no one on our line (except for Dwan Edwards) has ever played their new position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max997 Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 Jared Gaither, chronic foot injuries aside, is in the same mold of the guy we traded to the Eagles. He was drafted in the later rounds and turned into a starting caliber LT. He slipped that far because of his work ethic, unlike Peters who was a tight end. He got into a good system and was coached up to become a good young LT in this league. However, Baltimore must have saw some deficiency in his play that necessitated them picking a LT in the First round last year. A guy the Bills passed on. first of all you need to get your facts straight Jason Peters was an undrafetd rookie free agent the Bills signed to play tackle Jared Gaither did not slip to the later rounds because of his work ethic, he wasnt even in the draft. He was selected in the 5th round of the Supplemental Draft and where a player is taken in that draft is entirely different then where he is taken in the NFL draft. I guess since Baltimore decided to draft Oher it meant they must have saw some deficiency in Gaithers play? How about they just thought Oher was too good to pass up where they were picking or that they knew Gaither was coming up on free agency and they didnt want to pay him the going rate for top LTs in the league? Maybe they thought they would make something on their investment of a 5th round pick in the Supplemental Draft while also getting great value in Oher where they were able to get him i dont know about anyone else but that just sounds like good football to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Doug Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 first of all you need to get your facts straight Jason Peters was an undrafetd rookie free agent the Bills signed to play tackle Was he actually signed to play tackle at first? Was he even re-signed to play tackle after we cut him at first? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloBill Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 Was he actually signed to play tackle at first? Was he even re-signed to play tackle after we cut him at first? He came in as a tight end - his position at Arkansas. He converted to RT then to LT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russ 'Em Posted May 11, 2010 Author Share Posted May 11, 2010 And according to his college coach at Maryland, he did have motivational and work ethic problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 . As I see it Nix is thinking this will be a 2 year "rebuilding" process. In saying this I think that the HC and GM decided that Chan could coach up what he has on the offensive side of the ball this year. Is that why he tried to give away picks to get McNabb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transient Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 And according to his college coach at Maryland, he did have motivational and work ethic problems. And he was in the supplemental draft in the first place because he was ineligible to play his junior season because his grades were below that deemed acceptable by his coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mousetrap08 Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 So the draft is over and most media outlets are complaining that we didn't address our LT or QB needs in the first 4 rounds. Jared Gaither and Jamal Brown have been bandied around in the media and on this board as possible options for the Bills need. This however isn't going to happen. Jared Gaither, chronic foot injuries aside, is in the same mold of the guy we traded to the Eagles. He was drafted in the later rounds and turned into a starting caliber LT. He slipped that far because of his work ethic, unlike Peters who was a tight end. He got into a good system and was coached up to become a good young LT in this league. However, Baltimore must have saw some deficiency in his play that necessitated them picking a LT in the First round last year. A guy the Bills passed on. Brown was out all last season with a back injury. He is 29. He would be a stop gap for a couple years and it would be a risk paying him FA LT money when he didn't play ball last year. Our offense seems to have some holes that will need to be addressed, there is no denying that. But our defense might have had the tougher task going into this offseason. Few teams have had success in switching from a 4-3 to a 3-4 in one year. We have alot of promising young talent on that side of the ball and we added more. I think Chan was trying to make that switch as easy as possible for the team. that's why they went out and stacked up on DEs and LBs. You can never have enough of either one in this system. Obviously they are going to run some hybrid defenses throughout the course of the game, but now that they have the needed talent in place they can be as confident as possible that there defense will not be the weak unit. As I see it Nix is thinking this will be a 2 year "rebuilding" process. In quotes because obviously these guys will need to show improvement over last years debacle. In saying this I think that the HC and GM decided that Chan could coach up what he has on the offensive side of the ball this year. Waiting until next year to draft or bring in the starting LT and hopefully Qb of the future. We drafted some adequate backup line man in calloway and Wang and if they can shine in whatever action they get this year, who knows, diamonds in the rough. By all accounts next years Qb class will be ripe for the picking and I'm sure a LT prospect or 3 will rise above the rest of the comp. This year is going to be about toughness, mental and physical, and who is going to be around for the rebuilding process. We have I think, the most rookie FA signed of any team this year. Our draft was made up of character, self motivated guys. Let the auditions for the Superbowl run of 2012 begin! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocwocka Posted May 11, 2010 Share Posted May 11, 2010 Hey guys, not to be a Debbie Downer but, even if we hit on all our picks and some of the UFAs, we will not even be close to holding the jocks of the Pats* and Jets for a couple of years. They are proven in the most vital areas. Miami, on the other hand, is probably a lesser hurdle for us. Here's to hoping that competence will reign in our front office for the first time in 15 years! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 The Ravens have foolishly advertised that Gaither has motivation issues. Not a good way to begin trade talks when your looking for a 1st or 2nd round pick in return. Most teams are very aware of the type of person Gaither is. There are few secrets in the league about players, especially those who are being dangled in the market. I'm not suggesting that Gaither is a bad dude. He is not. What he certainly is not is a self-motiveated and hard working employee. Donavan McNabb is a probable HOF qb who still has 3-5 very productive years in front of him. He is a self-motivated player who works hard in and out of season. This franchise qb was traded for a second round pick. Gaither doesn't come close to DM's value. It is agreed that the LT position is one of the most critical positions on a team. Gaither is not the type of player/person to invest in, unless his trade price and contract expectations are very much lowered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewildrabbit Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Yea well, it is a win now league and I think if this new HC and GM falter big time and go 1-15 or winless, then they can kiss their 2-3 year plan goodbye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurman#1 Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Truth is always stranger than fiction. QBs and LTs do in fact grow on trees. Super Bowl caliber QBs and LTs do not. It will take a little time for the opportunity to get such players on our roster presents itself. During the draft none of the players available at either position impressed me more than any other at the same position. As far as trading for a LT right now I see no reason to over spend in terms of next years draft picks. Brown and Gaither are not worth next years second in my opinion. The Ravens have foolishly advertised that Gaither has motivation issues. Not a good way to begin trade talks when your looking for a 1st or 2nd round pick in return. Yeah, "foolishly" advertised his motivation problems. And how often do the Ravens get advertised as foolish in player personnel issues? How often do we hear unauthorized leaks from the Ravens? They want to keep Gaither. We never heard about any motivation problems with him right up until this year when supposedly they wanted to get rid of him. Supposedly. On the other hand, they might be thinking that having two bookend tackles would be a perfect situation for them. What better way to stop teams from offering enough to seriously threaten to get him. There's no way to wrest Gaither away without a first-round pick. Other than that, the Ravens can turn the deals down. The Ravens love the way this is going. They can tell Gaither that nobody wanted him, and "Hey, we don't know where that rumor came from. Do you think you have motivation issues, Jared?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thurman#1 Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Most teams are very aware of the type of person Gaither is. There are few secrets in the league about players, especially those who are being dangled in the market. I'm not suggesting that Gaither is a bad dude. He is not. What he certainly is not is a self-motiveated and hard working employee. Donavan McNabb is a probable HOF qb who still has 3-5 very productive years in front of him. He is a self-motivated player who works hard in and out of season. This franchise qb was traded for a second round pick. Gaither doesn't come close to DM's value. It is agreed that the LT position is one of the most critical positions on a team. Gaither is not the type of player/person to invest in, unless his trade price and contract expectations are very much lowered. McNabb is near the end of his career. If he were Gaither's age, you'd have had to give two firsts to have gotten him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthGeorgiaBillsFan Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 The problem is that we used our top draft pick on the one position that we needed least. That right there pretty much killed any optimism I had about the new regime. I did like the way we drafted on the defensive side of the ball, but drafting Spiller was supremely ill-advised imo. I'm not going to lie, I wanted Tebow at #9. I think OT is a much bigger need for us than QB but even still I watched Tebow play in at least 15 games and I believe he is going to be an elite hall of fame caliber QB. But if not Tebow, why oh why did we not draft an OT or trade down for more picks if we didn't like the value at #9? It just doesn't make an ounce of sense to me, for a team with more holes than solid positions to draft with their top pick the one position where we have talent and depth. It is beyond idiotic and really I'm tired of people trying to sugar coat this or be optimistic about it. What we should all be is pissed off (again). I hate to rain on the little optimism parade but we are going to suck so hard its not going to be funny. Even though I think we drafted well on defense, our defense is not going to be in the top half of the league. Not even close. We will be abused on both sides of the ball, and even when the defense is having a competitive game, our offensive ineptitude is going to force them to stay on the field until they become exhausted and then get steamrolled or injured, again. No, this is not going to be a good season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnC Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 McNabb is near the end of his career. If he were Gaither's age, you'd have had to give two firsts to have gotten him. McNabb is a franchise qb, admittedly at the end of his career. But given that he still is capable of playing at a very high level for 3-5 yrs. The point I was making is that even at this late stage of his career he has more trade value than the younger LT, Gaither who has some less impressive work habits. As far as giving up two first round picks for a younger McNabb even that deal would never have happened. Most teams don't give up their probable HOF qb in their prime and the face of their very successful franchse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coseybedaman Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Gaither is a complete stud at left tackle first of all. Secondly, he is NOTHING like Jason Peters in the slightest bit. Gaither is a smothering, huge, and uncharacteristically tall tackle. Like previously noted, Peters was a quick, athletic, tight end conversion. Are we seriously worried about the man's grades in college?? Fact of the matter is that he has been an exceptional tackle, and the Michael Oher pick was an example of a team with a ton of depth drafting the best player on their board rather than going with a need. Oher is very marketable as well and Gaither's contract was running out. None of these reasons warrant not picking Gaither up in my opinion. A franchise left tackle makes the ENTIRE line much better as we have seen time and time again. I am sick of trying to build ONLY through the draft. I agree that is where your core comes from, but if you look at EVERY super bowl winner for the last 10 years free agency and trades are always just as much a factor as drafted players on those teams. YOU NEED BOTH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted May 12, 2010 Share Posted May 12, 2010 Yea well, it is a win now league and I think if this new HC and GM falter big time and go 1-15 or winless, then they can kiss their 2-3 year plan goodbye. If it is really a win now league as you say, then I'd say having a 2-3 year plan should give us a competitive advantage in year 2 or 3... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts