apuszczalowski Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Link to the other side of the story? Sorry, I am at the same point with Pig Ben as I was with Michael Vick before his trial. 99% convinced that the bastard is guilty. Tha is the American Way! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 I can only imagine what was on that videotape that mysteriously disappeared. Because if there was ANYTHING on it to suggest the sex was consensual, it would still be around, or at least magically reappear, with the way Small Ben is getting killed in the press and court of public opinion. Then again, maybe Sir Roger had it destroyed? He's done it before, you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBeane Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Everyone only believes the girl though. Ben says they didn't have sex and did have sexual contact. That "sexual contact" could be anything from making out and feeling her up, and so on. He was not charged with a crime because the girl was really drunk and has a clouded memory of the events. Interesting how she all of the sudden remembers things well enough to say he did rape her, when the initial statement she wrote was barely legible because she was that drunk. People do crazy things to get money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffaloed in Pa Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Everyone only believes the girl though. Ben says they didn't have sex and did have sexual contact. That "sexual contact" could be anything from making out and feeling her up, and so on. He was not charged with a crime because the girl was really drunk and has a clouded memory of the events. Interesting how she all of the sudden remembers things well enough to say he did rape her, when the initial statement she wrote was barely legible because she was that drunk. People do crazy things to get money. Probably the date rape drug she was slipped when Pig Ben was buying the drinks?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BADOLBILZ Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Everyone only believes the girl though. Ben says they didn't have sex and did have sexual contact. That "sexual contact" could be anything from making out and feeling her up, and so on. He was not charged with a crime because the girl was really drunk and has a clouded memory of the events. Interesting how she all of the sudden remembers things well enough to say he did rape her, when the initial statement she wrote was barely legible because she was that drunk. People do crazy things to get money. I agree. It's unpopular to support the idea of "innocent until proven guilty" but this is a serious charge being applied to a pretty murky situation. He might have done it, but he might not have. Maybe she didn't pursue the criminal charge because she knew he didn't do it, but wants a payday. Accusing someone that you know is innocent, of a crime that can send them to prison is on par with murder, IMO. He is certainly guilty of being an idiot based on his past history but if I were on a jury I wouldn't convict him for what I've heard or read, that's for certain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 here's all 572 pages....have fun... http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years...lisberger1.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts