BeastMode54 Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 I have been sick of the posts on Peters for a while, but I need to make this known. A lot of you have tried to defend his trade by saying he was fat, overrated, and lazy. I have seen more than a number of Eagles games and he has been a beast. Just like he was with the Bills. Our team has a lot of holes, A LOT, and we would have one less if we didn;t trade him away, or...better yet...giving him a decent contract 2 years ago at a much more manageable rate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Gave up two sacks and a false start tonight alone. He's awesome. PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?...p;#entry1645111 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastMode54 Posted November 23, 2009 Author Share Posted November 23, 2009 Gave up two sacks and a false start tonight alone. He's awesome. PTR the sack stat is totally miscued, but I'd rather take two sacks and false start while mauling guys the rest of the game, than mediocre to $hitty play and tons of false starts that we cunrrently have. You have no idea what you are talking about if you think hes not a good player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quester74 Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 the sack stat is totally miscued, but I'd rather take two sacks and false start while mauling guys the rest of the game, than mediocre to $hitty play and tons of false starts that we cunrrently have. You have no idea what you are talking about if you think hes not a good player. Who cares how a LT is playing for ANOTHER team? Whether you approved of the trade or not, get over it. Worry about how players still wearing blue and red are playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastMode54 Posted November 23, 2009 Author Share Posted November 23, 2009 http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/index.php?...p;#entry1645111 Watch any NFl game, ANY...NFL game, and let me know play for play how their NFL left tackle does Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 the sack stat is totally miscued, but I'd rather take two sacks and false start while mauling guys the rest of the game, than mediocre to $hitty play and tons of false starts that we cunrrently have. You have no idea what you are talking about if you think hes not a good player. You'd take a guy who gave up 32 sacks and took 16 false start penalties over the course of the season and we don't know what we're talking about? Get a clue, dude. For the record, he isn't 'mauling' anybody this game. Stop watching it with rose-colored glasses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExWNYer Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 I have been sick of the posts on Peters for a while, but I need to make this known. A lot of you have tried to defend his trade by saying he was fat, overrated, and lazy. I have seen more than a number of Eagles games and he has been a beast. Just like he was with the Bills. Our team has a lot of holes, A LOT, and we would have one less if we didn;t trade him away, or...better yet...giving him a decent contract 2 years ago at a much more manageable rate. Honestly, whether you're bashing him or defending him, who gives a rat's a$$??! He's gone....love it or hate it...good, bad, or indifferent. Can we all just get on with our post-Peters football lives now, please? Cripes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastMode54 Posted November 23, 2009 Author Share Posted November 23, 2009 You'd take a guy who gave up 32 sacks and took 16 false start penalties over the course of the season and we don't know what we're talking about? Get a clue, dude. For the record, he isn't 'mauling' anybody this game. Stop watching it with rose-colored glasses. Yea, Bell, Chamber, Scott, Walker, they are all much much better, You need to get a clue dude. He's MUCH better than those guys, and it's a hole thats not easy to fix. Or....it would have been had we taken Oher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Yea, Bell, Chamber, Scott, Walker, they are all much much better, You need to get a clue dude. He's MUCH better than those guys, and it's a hole thats not easy to fix. Or....it would have been had we taken Oher. I didn't say Bell, Chambers, Scott, or Walker were better than him. But the point still stands; he's not even close to being worth what he's being paid. You just said you'd rather have a guy giving up 2 sacks/game and one false start/game. It's pretty obvious that your opinions need to be taken with a grain of salt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Nice tripping penalty there too. Care to retract your bull **** statement BeastMode?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4BillsintheBurgh Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 I didn't say Bell, Chambers, Scott, or Walker were better than him. But the point still stands; he's not even close to being worth what he's being paid. You just said you'd rather have a guy giving up 2 sacks/game and one false start/game. It's pretty obvious that your opinions need to be taken with a grain of salt. Is Evans worth what he is getting paid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonidas Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Is Evans worth what he is getting paid? Not on this team. Not when we don't have a way of getting him the ball. But I believe he's a top WR in this league. We also had to pay him more to stay on a bad team, and his value is a little higher for being a good teammate. However WR is a dependent position. With no consistent play at the quarterback position it's a little more difficult to evaluate. Tackle is not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Not on this team. Not when we don't have a way of getting him the ball. But I believe he's a top WR in this league. We also had to pay him more to stay on a bad team, and his value is a little higher for being a good teammate. However WR is a dependent position. With no consistent play at the quarterback position it's a little more difficult to evaluate. Tackle is not. He's a top #2 WR and an average #1 Wr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4BillsintheBurgh Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Not on this team. Not when we don't have a way of getting him the ball. But I believe he's a top WR in this league. We also had to pay him more to stay on a bad team, and his value is a little higher for being a good teammate. However WR is a dependent position. With no consistent play at the quarterback position it's a little more difficult to evaluate. Tackle is not. We would have had to pay Peters or anyone else decent more to stay. That's what happens when your front office is more interested in the bottom line than winning. It really comes down to creating a team here rather than blowing things up every four years or so. Whether Peters was worth the money or not there was no quality plan for replacement of the three decent lineman that were gotten rid of from last year, regardless of those guys contracts. Good teams replace players by bringing in more talented people, not by dropping them and hoping the camp fodder on the roster will make do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Is Evans worth what he is getting paid? Two Wrongs make a right. Right on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4BillsintheBurgh Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Two Wrongs make a right. Right on! Here's the point -> Here's you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwampD Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 I agree that Peters looks good,..really good. That only makes me hate him more. He never looked this good while he was here which means He CHOSE to half-ass it. He CHOSE to suck while he was here because he was unhappy. Boo Effin Hoo. I'm glad he's not a Bill. As good as he looks, I'll be impressed when he actually finishes a season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 Here's the point -> Here's you Right underneath the point. I concur. It's like you're reading my mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flbillsfan#1 Posted November 23, 2009 Share Posted November 23, 2009 He's a top #2 WR and an average #1 Wr We will see NEXT year how good Evans is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts