Search the Community

Back to the point a dem PAC sued a 15 week limit that got it thrown at the federal level. Ow it's not a federal issue. Now amount of "double backing" makes that false.

Cause it was a highly funded Dem PAC that fought the 15 week limit law in Mississippi, that got it all tossed. Even RBG knew it was on very shaky ground.

Project twenty five was created by a dem funded PAC. The rest is pure fear mongering and explains the irrational posting of the op. Fear consumes and breaks logical thoughts processes

its flawed data provided by a DEM PAC with 10K doctors counted as members. there are over a million doctors in the USA Same site was 100% supportive of mandates, vaccines, school closures. its got the integrity of the OP that posted it.

Highly funded PACs directly the mob on current things. Not unusual for communist hypocrites to be anti semites.

No one outside dumb PACs want to ban that drug. It's making. It mail order and teledock that removes the safety factor of the mother. These pills can have severe side affects if used after certain gestation.

Just imagine if a political big money funded PAC didn't fight the 15 week limit , getting row tossed. Wouldn't even be a discussion.

That made more sense when trump was in office. Now people feel Bidens agenda that's negatively impacting the majority. whats the old saying, "its the economy silly" and the economy sucks for most out side of the very top. the abortion/lgbt youth wedge topic is dominating the folks on the left. and in turn because DEM PACS are targeting them. , the ones that are not responsible for things like wealth, bills and taxes. And what is the solution to both parties like you stated above?

tried to look up the donors to that PAC. they don't even have a web page anymore. good luck finding anything on google. Cant have the mob knowing DEM mega donors got row killed over a 15 week limit.

Dobbs. and don't forget it was a Highly funded DEM Pac that sued the 15-week state limit, that took the case to the supreme court. That ruled that abortion is not a federal issue, but a state issue.

Not even close. More like fiction becoming reality or vice versa. and its effed up as teens between 11-15 are the most self-conscience as they are going through puberty, and exactly the age group the Highly funded PACS and their puppets target.

yes it's not working and hasn't for years as the wealth is being concentrated at the top and income inequality is at records. No one said unregulated. It's not a binary topic. The excess wealth from this difference in consumption is often invested, but we have seen more and more lately that the elites use that money to invest in themselves and maintaining their own positions. Corporations use more and more of their profits for stock buybacks to increase share prices and less in new training, technology, and innovation. And in turn they donate huge sums to tax exempt PACs vs taxes. As the PACs promote their needs and prop up corporate tools playing politician. Are you saying PACs should be taxed? And agree on the last part. For the most part they bought these politicians through said PACs. And it's kinda full circle as the largest share holders in most fortune 500 are investment funds that are also most people's 401k and pension funds. Tax cuts for corporations and the wealthiest Americans inevitably lower revenues and increase yearly deficits Most corps are under ten people and main Street. When their rate is low they hire and pay more. The big boys just offshore to avoid taxes. And it's basic that if the corporate rate is higher than other countries, they move. See Ireland and Panama

personal tax cuts should come back. people spending creates less bubbles. Massive federal spending ends up at the top and the donors' pockets. Remove tax exempt from PACs and let the rich pay their fair share vs donating to PACS that then promote politicians and wedge topics that promote the system/spending that ends up right back in their pockets. the left talks of removing tax exempt from churches and doesn't want to cut cost. that would raise revenue. Many hear corporate, and they automatically go to the fortune 500. but 95% of corporations are small. like the coffee shop and mechanic on the corner. The global ones can avoid those cost by offshoring and moving HQ to places like Ireland and Panama. the mom and pop (majority), not so much. probably collect more revenue if the largest jump in our progressive tax quintiles was not right at the median household income level. Why does federal receipts jump from 12% to 22% right at median household income level? and was it always like this? https://www.irs.gov/filing/federal-income-tax-rates-and-brackets Tax rate on taxable income from minimum income up to the top. 10% $0$11,000 12% $11,001$44,725 22% $44,726$95,375 24% $95,376$182,100 32% $182,101$231,250 35% $231,251$578,125 37% $578,126And up The median household income is $74,580. The rich pay the majority of federal receipts. the middle gets squeezed. The poor, homeless, fixed income are just trying to survive with the dollar being worth less every day. Removing the cap on the debt back in 2023 was a horrible Idea.

Still crazy how this all started with a dem PAC using over a 15 week limit. Where are the children?

WHO funds the PAC that is trying to get trump off the ballot? What's the name of the PAC? Nope, PACS trying to influence or sway, and election is the problem. Any of them suing to keep DEMS off the ballot anywhere?

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68237791 Putin challenger Boris Nadezhdin barred from Russia's election Russia's election commission has rejected anti-war challenger Boris Nadezhdin as a candidate in next month's presidential vote. Mr Nadezhdin has been relatively critical of Vladimir Putin's full-scale war in Ukraine when few dissenting voices have been tolerated in Russia. So just like Ukraine and the USA. Today a Shady funded PAC is taking the Colorado case to keep trump off the ticket, to the SC. the MSM will cover this nonstop, all day. every narrative outside following the money.

What pac. What think tank?

Justice Jackson has weighed in on more legal questions of Jan. 6 rioting than any other Supreme Court member | CNN Politics Seems her mind is already made up. Jackson, while serving on a federal trial-level court in Washington, DC, oversaw a handful of criminal cases against rioters as the Justice Department was making its first batches of arrests after the deadly attack. “How close can a person be to unquestionably violent and completely unacceptable lynch-mob-like acts of others and still claim to be a nondangerous, truly innocent bystander,” The case before the nine justices this week concerns an effort by a group of voters in Colorado (DEM Mega funded PAC) to remove Trump from that state’s ballot under the Constitution’s 14th Amendment ban on insurrectionists holding office. The voters argue Trump “engaged in insurrection” through his conduct on January 6. LMAO Attorneys for the Colorado voters seeking to keep Trump off the ballot emphasized the grisly details of the riot in court filings ahead of Thursday’s arguments, calling it the “most violent attack on our nation’s Capitol since the War of 1812.” Since 1812 the capital has actually been attacked, mass shooting and bombed. All pardoned by DEMS. Then-Judge Jackson ultimately handed the rioter cases she was assigned off to other judges when she left the district court after President Joe Biden elevated her to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. But her statements from the period immediately following the attack offer an indication of how she might approach the riot in the Trump ballot case. “Many of the attendees of this rally were lured to the Capitol Building itself,” she said at a March 2021 hearing for Texas rioter Christopher Grider (he was later convicted). “They participated in what many scholars and commentators have characterized as an armed insurrection … If there is a more serious offense in terms of who we are as a society and the democratic order that is at the core of our constitutional scheme, I don’t know what is.” And they will continue to attack Thomas as biased. SMH

Hrc is a mega corporate and elite funded pac that pays no taxes and fights for porn in schools

The voices are pandering to the slowest of the slow. the Supreme court ruled that abortion is a STATES issue. Not fed. (Ironically due to a DEM PAC suing over Mississippi 15 week limit) So, any talk of banning or restoring on a federal level is just pandering to ignorance. And kind of explains why the most ignorant in here are posting it.

Its amazing how many of you like to ignore it was a shady DEM PAC that sued the 15 week limit, and took the case to the courts. Even RBG knew the federal regulation was rocky using the 14th. Its going to end up like the EU with separate laws for each state. Up here in NY we are throwing money at PP (A company that doesn't pay taxes and lobbies)

DAMN Biden Pulled almost 100 million dollars in December. mostly from mega donors, Dirty PACS and untraceable small transactions. (under 200 are untraceable) https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/15/politics/biden-democrats-fundraising-haul/index.html Biden and the Democratic Party last quarter exceeded the $72 million and $71 million raised in the second and third quarters of 2023, respectively. And for the first time, Biden outraised the amount brought in by former President Barack Obama at the same point in the cycle. Obama raised $68 million in the fourth quarter of 2011, and Biden’s team had eyed a roughly $67 million target for last quarter Biden’s team held a total of 39 fundraisers during the fourth quarter, with Biden himself bringing in over $15 million from high-dollar donors during a December fundraising sprint

When it's a requirement of both the institutional investors (black rock) and Huge political PACS like HRC, that will rank you accordingly. Compliance is not a choice. all the diversity groups parrot the same exact thing as they do the same exact thing, while allowing no alternative viewpoints. Its not very diverse of thought or idea. it's just the same Robin Deangelo tripe parroted over and over again.

Should read PAC vs democracy. Hopefully the courts do the right thing and let the people choose.

What pac. What ngo