Jump to content

The Big Cat

Community Member
  • Posts

    17,855
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The Big Cat

  1. I WONDER WHICH WHALEY SHENANIGANS MASTER SHAKE WILL B word ABOUT NOW
  2. Gee... Jokes on them. Didn't follow the link. Won't follow the link.
  3. Look, if it's about NFL experience, then neither of THEM should be ranked. But there IS tape on Taylor. So rank him last accordingly, and don't put guys with ZERO snaps on the list.
  4. Yet wouldn't Wilson's low-volume of passes justify bringing his team into an argument about the rise of a rush attack?
  5. It's not the fact that they're ahead of TT, it's that they--without any NFL tape--are ahead of Hoyer, et al.
  6. But I think you're conflating the opposing argument. Is anyone making it about draft position? Or importance of a sustained rush attack? This is based on the jboy's claim that smaller defenders populating units to counter aerial attacks will now make for schemes vulnerable to bruising rushers. I'm not sure what draft position says to refute that.
  7. I think many of you are confusing a critique of PFF's HIGHLY questionable metrics/standards for homerism in favor of our guy.
  8. YES. It's entirely inconsistent with their modality. If they wanted to make them 30 and 31 with TT @ 32, then THAT would make sense.
  9. Which is why Winston and Mariota are ranked 30 and 31, right? Right!?
  10. Is this what it means to have an honest conversation about race?
  11. How bout the team that--had they run the ball on second and goal from the one--would have won the last two super bowls?
  12. Yep. And with the Bills noticabely ahead of this curve, it adds to the unspeakable frustration every time the Bills--with a great defense and ground attack--have each and every evaluation arrested by "yeah but who's the QB?"
  13. Then this could be a great chance for you to learn how you're perceived. I have a feeling you'll miss the opportunity though.
  14. Then may be you can be a little more clear as to what you intended to convey in the bolded sections below: If you had intended to convey a reasonable, thoughtful evaluation of Whaley's time as Bills GM, you failed, miserably.
  15. The Whaley-hater crowd has zero credibility, IMO. Sorry, bud.
  16. I can see why you'd think this given we've never experienced this being the case. Ever.
  17. I'm completely serious: Bills rushing yards Sunday, over/under: 189. Anyone taking the under?
  18. Translation: I'm going to start throwing out wild, baseless, emotionally-charged accusations, and when you guys call me on my bull ****, I'll act like you're the ones that are being unreasonable.
  19. Is this more revenue for the organization? Or will the advertising just offset the production costs? If they are in the black, where does that money go? Is it part of league-wide revenue sharing? And if yes, have other teams, in larger media markets, earning more revenue from advertising been tossing cash Buffalo's way all along?
  20. NATE CLEMENTS!!! He ended every interview with his 'signature' question: If you were an animal which would you be, and why?
  21. Bills fans would be well served to stop assuming they are not.
  22. Then he's either lying or incompetent.
  23. I know enough to know that CRAZY **** always happens in week one.
×
×
  • Create New...