The Big Cat

The Colts have an exceptionally weak roster...except the QB. They're the inverse of the Bills.

This is madness.

First roster updates generally solve these issues.

These are problems Bills fans aren't used to.

Then can we transition and talk about how Caleb's ridiculous helmet makes him look like the snot bubble kid from Little Giants?

That's good advice.

Please note: this thread was not started in snark. I am genuinely appreciative of the substantive feedback that was provided. If I knew how--or if I had permission--I'd go ahead and close this thread. Nothing left to see. You guys are great.

According to his 2012 game log he was perfect from 10/14 on... http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/CarpDa44/gamelog/2012/

It's a quick question.

Was expecting this (don't know why). Was nicely surprised.

98% of the other 58% were in middle school when they won their first three championships. So there's that.

Perhaps they tried to force him out and he refused. Wells Report and all the so-called witch-hunting came after the SB. It's easier to tuck away and make Brady the fall guy because if Bellicheat really has been pulling the strings all along, it discredits the last 15 years of professional football, during which time ONE team has been consistently in contention and during which time the brand rose to prominence WELL ahead of any other professional sport in the modern era. If it comes out that the Patriots* single-handedly (through Bellicheat) compromised the integrity of the last 15 earth shattering, ratings obliterating years, then the NFL stands to lose A LOT.

But Belly could be TELLING them its Tom's preference. It's 100% possible they could know--or think they know--what Tom likes simply from what they've been told by the true Svengali. Unless there's a detail somewhere I'm missing.

You'll have to excuse me, I don't have the full transcript from a pair of 25K/yr nimrods imprinted to memory.

For all we know Bellicheat was the middle man in all of this.

You do understand that you're arguing with his premise that not everything you've heard is true by repeating everything we've heard.

No, see, that's the part that actually does make sense. Which texts are you referring to?

Makes zero sense? It makes perfect sense. Why would he implicate someone if he didn't have to?

This all makes way too much sense.

He won't be limited for week one until we're up or down by 30 points.

My assumption has been that for a team that plans to carry the ball 40+ times a game, they're not wasting anybody's legs in PS/TC. With this in mind, I think it's perfectly reasonable to assume that what they're categorizing as an injury worthy of 2-3 weeks rest could--for all we know--be a mosquito bite.

I was honestly going to suggest this like two days ago when the local medical community here had already signed off on it being an appendix thing but didn't want to have to deal with the mods.

I see. So unless you question everything scooped by guys like Schefter (whose accuracy rate is hovering around 98%), you're a media worshipper. Cool beans.

Is this what we do now? Just question everything that everyone reports?

Oh yeah, hurts like hell. But less scarring than an EXplosion.