HereComesTheReignAgain

I'm not talking about two guys fighting, I'm talking about a situation where there is somebody who is an unwilling participant in a crime. If three guys are beating one guy or if a woman is being assaulted by a man. It is usually not hard to tell the difference between two drunks fighting and somebody who needs your help. But if you want to use your example as an excuse to not get involved go ahead.

Two sattelite NFL channel hosts were commenting on how great Saban is and that he made a great move hiring the former Bills head coach as offensive coordinator. Their reasoning was that he really knows the division opponents. Correct me if I am missing something, but don't 2 out of 3 division opponents have totally different coaching staffs with different schemes? The only team that may resemble the last few years is New England and Malarkey didn't exactly have them figured out! I'm sure these guys were not impressed with Malarkey when he was calling the plays for Buffalo! Oh well, I guess we need to deal with the Saban love fest until the Dolphins start losing again.

As long as you don't get upset if people walk by as you are being beaten or killed, I guess that is a fine attitude. Evil thrives when good people do nothing.

I must be stepping into some sarcastic trap because you can't possibly think that forcing two people to live together is more realistic than forced sterilization due to child neglect. You had me going for a while though. A lot of women agreed to "obey" in their vows too, does that mean my wife has to do whatever I say under penalty of law? That would certainly make for a happier house for me! I hope for your sake that this is in fact a dry attempt at humor and not your twisted views.

I'd like some data on the "wide support" you claim. Would people without kids be allowed to divorce? Who decides what the "right reasons" are? We can't listen to the majority that feel gay marriages are wrong, but you and your "wide support" can tell me what the "right reasons" for marriage are? If you are really concerned about the children, why don't we sterilize anyone that has a child but needs public assistance to survive. If you can't afford a kid, don't have em. If you can't stop having kids we will help you stop. If you are a drug addict...sterilized. Repeat criminal...sterilized. Only good parents should reproduce.

I guess I didn't realize that it took a majority vote to get a breathalyzer test. If two officers smelled alchohol on his breath how do they explain the fact that the didn't even feel it was necessary to make him blow in a straw! The two who smelled the alchohol were probably Republicans just like the girl who claims to have served him drinks. She was out to get him too. Oh well, nobody likes a "victim" like the libs.

It's not quite at the Ray Nagin level with his "God wants a chocolate city" remark, but still pretty bad. The Kennedy's are sort of like the Diplomats in Lethal Weapon, they break the law and just need to flash their Kenomatic Immunity cards.

He was so messed up that he didn't know where he was when the cops got to him yet no sobriety test was given...sounds pretty standard to me, no special treatment! He doesn't remember anything about the crash or the events leading up to it...except that he was not drinking. How convenient that his memory works fine when it comes to denying getting drunk. The woman who claims to have served him drinks must be lying! Unless someone has a time machine, Kennedy cannot take responsibility for his actions because he already received special treatment when he avoided the sobriety test. But hey, if he wants to play the role of martyr... The press should also be going after the police officers who failed to administer the appropriate tests to Kennedy.

But I don't want to wait until retirement to start drinking heavily. (or continue drinking)

We can only hope that the witnesses suffer a similair fate while people walk by too dissinterested to help! I had a friend that was jumped by several guys at a bar. Many of his "friends" that were there didn't do anything to help because they were cowards and "thought he had everything under control". Doctors later drilled a hole in his skull to relieve the pressure! I could not go through life thinking I could have saved a life but was too afraid to help. The same people who will not get involved in helping to prevent or solve crimes are the first ones to complain when a crime affects their lives. This is why the "don't snitch" shirts that are showing up all over Rochester are so disturbing. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem!

Actually I took the quote right from your post. You said "He should be giving workshops to other players on life after ball." I'm not disagreeing with the other parts of the post.

I don't know about "giving workshops to other players on life after ball". I think he has had some rough times over the last several years with alchohol and/or drugs. I'm not saying he is a bad person, just not the guy you want to model your life after!

People are really discussing The 2007 draft!? I'm not exactly Mr. Optimism, but it really must suck to live in your world!

That was the same breakfast that Hillary stated "one more game and WE are in the Stanley Cup playoffs". Of course she is not from Buffalo and WE have been in the playoffs for weeks.

The NRA should have a field day with this. They are such good friends with Schumer.

How do I put this diplomatically? Guns don't kill people, Schumer Kills people.

Alan Hevesi recently stated that Chuck Schumer would be ``the man who, how do I phrase this diplomatically, who will put a bullet between the president's eyes if he could get away with it.'' That is how he would phrase it "diplomatically"? Of course he would not have a gun to shoot the President with if he had his way because he is a huge anti-gun advocate. These are the morons we elect to office in NY!

Thanks for explaining it to me. I not smart like you. I feel like I'm taking up too much of your time now. I'm sure there are lots of other people who would be impressed by your condescending intelligence.

I'll try to post more gems like yours. You are now my idol!

Those damn cavemen and their SUVs!

I may not have the best grammar, but when I call someone a fool I would try to make it more than two words after that before misspelling something. Nothing against YOU, just your post.

I deserve to be called obnoxious after you contributed so much with that pointless post?

I really hope that you do not feel that is a good diversified portfolio for retirement!

I would be willing to bet that the majority of the workers who had most or all of their retirement $ in Enron stock were told at one time how stupid it was. It is a basic rule of retirement investing that no one stock should ever make up a big % of your portfolio. When you are making a fortune on a stock, you tend to think it will never go down and the common sense rules don't apply to you. I think there was some issue with restrictions on selling Enron stock also. That is the only situation that deserves any sympathy with regard to Enron stock.

How many pardons did Mr and Mr Clinton grant on his way out of office? Some really slimy people if I remember correctly!