todd

Maybe at face value. But the message he sends to the rest of the NFL by being a jerk hurts his value. He sits and he's screwed. Donahoe knows this, and holds all the cards.

He can't sit. If he sits the year he is still property of the Bills next year, and any team that wants to sign him has to get his rights from the Bills. The Bills hold the cards here, not Henry.

Ah! You stole some songs off my IPOD, eh? Love the housemartins, The Smiths, etc. However, I'm more of a Wilco fan than Uncle Tupelo, but I still like Tupelo.

Stop with the logic, will you? Sheesh.

In the same vein, "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain."

You are backtracking you little wussie! Out of last year's pro bowl roster, only 6 are 4th round and below. Only six! Of those six, two were drafted by donahoe. Do you know what percentage that is? Let me clue you in. ONE THIRD of the pro bowl players on last year's roster who were drafted below the 3rd round were drafted by Tom Donahoe! That means that there is no GM in the entire NFL who was better. So not only is your theory about Donahoe being a poor drafter incorrect, it is actually the opposite. Tom Donahoe is the best GM in the NFL at drafting Pro-Bowl players below the 3rd round. You may admit that you are a fool now. At the very least, a real man would admit that he is wrong. Facts tell me that you are.

Let the B word-slapping continue. So-Cal, you are offically Alaska Darin's B word. You should put that under your avatar.

That's exactly what I'm talking about. Opinions in a vacum. I'm surprised you keep coming back for more, given the royal bitchslap you've been dealt here in the past.

Whatever. It's easy to take a thoughtless opinion that matches your own thoughtless opinion and say "Ouch!"

NO, but opinions based on bullcrap do. You don't realize that in all your criticism you present an obviously lopsided view of reality. Donahoe has made some mistakes - show me a GM who hasn't -- but he's also done some damn smart things. And I think the good outweighs the bad. If you don't take the good with the bad and evaluate it as a whole -- which you and your anti-Donahoe nazis continually do, it's difficult to have a rational discussion. End of story.

That drives me friggin nuts. Because of the lunatic environmentalists and their anti-nuke stance, we've ended up having to build coal-burning power plants, which are friggin FILTHY! The stupidity of some of these idiots is astounding. The argument will end up being wind power, which is incredibly expensive and ineficcient, not to mention how much land it takes up. Ugh. Crazy stuff.

You've been fooled. Do some research regarding just how hydrogen will be produced. You'll be amazed. (hint - by using gobs of fossil fuels). I at first thought hydrogen was the best solution, but until they come up with a way to isolate hydrogen without using fossil fuels, GW's agenda is clear.

XTC - Skylarking

Agreed. The technology is proven, efficient, inexpensive, and clean. Much better for the environment than those damn coal-burning plants that produce acid rain.

When will this moron realize that finding new ways to utilize fossil fuels is not that panacea he thinks it is? Originally I thought he had finally seen the light and decided that fossil fuels are a giant weight on this economy, not to mention international policy. I was wrong, guess I expected too much. Bush - gots oil on the brain.

Like I said, opinions in a vacum are not a sign of a well founded evaluation.

I love opinions in a vacum. They show great intellect.

Ah, it was great to read that thread again. That was clearly the biggest smackdown I've seen here ever, and SoCal just kept coming back! God, he was like a Jehova's Witness of Donahoe hate.

To be honest with you, I don't believe a single word that POS web site publishes. The guy is rarely right, and is obviously a site designed by a ignorant rookie. It's there to generate ad revenue, and is clearly low budget.

Dude- I've been reading your posts long enough to know that you wouldn't be happy no matter WHO we drafted, or what we did on draft day. Am I right, or what? Can I hear an amen?

I'm curious as to why you are evaluating this year's offense, with a new signal caller, and comparing it to last year? It doesn't make much sense. Also remember that our TEs were all injured for a number of games, limiting the impact a TE could have stat-wise. Mularkey has repeatedly said they couldn't do many of the things they wanted to do on offense because of Bledsoe. I think involving a TE is one of them. Drafting a TE makes perfect sense given this reality.

How can you advocate such moronic drafting?

Yes! Donahoe should find someone who can play both ways or Donahoe sux! Damn fool GM!

Donahoe stinks! If we don't take a tackle in the second round of the draft this year we will completely fail! A tackle in the second round will make or break our season!

Maybe that would be best. The bridge jumping, that is. You can't evaluate a draft after the first day. You can't evaluate a draft after the first year. Quaaludes. Take em.