Taro T

Sorry to pick out a minor point in your rant, but provided you aren't talking blanket "death penalty good", as there are very few situations where it is; I don't see how it is necessarily hypocritical to be opposed to the taking of innocent lives and in favor of allowing some true scum to meet their maker sooner than they would have otherwise. Or to cut Dellapelle some slack, to allow some true scum to become worm food.

Not sure why you'd look in a mirror and automatically assume anyone else follows your progression of logic, but having read JA's posts for a long time, I truly doubt you have that one pegged correctly. Steely Dan. Like an oxymoron, just without the oxy.

Actually, if you're up by at least a field goal, it can make sense to give the other team a safety if you run out the clock. There's also a very few situations where it makes sense to take the safety and then punt from your own 20 rather than trying to punt the ball from your endzone.

What better time to do it? The moonmen definitely couldn't have seen the attack coming.

No, the Nobel Peace Prize has been a joke of an award since Arafat shared it.

Is this the 3rd point 5 benefit? Sorry.

At least that recipe uses potato pierogies. I can handle those. The cheese ones, not a chance. (Guess which type my aunt always makes at Christmas. )

The 1st site is pretty good, except they have the Bills wearing blue unis at home in the early 80's. They wore whites at home w/ the blue pants back then.

I'd probably flip the Cheatriots and Colts results, but I'd agree 2 L's the rest of the way through. Imagine what they could have done had this been '90. W/ Jimbo, Talley, and Bruce not being nearly 50, they should've taken all of them.

Other than "Buzz Beer", that should pretty much cover it. Of course, k&p are pretty much Buff-lo staples too.

So he doesn't write in the Lifestyles section anymore?

Welcome aboard Scott. D&C hasn't been the same w/out you.

I mean young, healthy people not getting insurance until they have a major health issue. You've already answered the question in your earlier posts in this thread. (Not requiring hospitals to treat those who can't pay and requiring (strongly suggesting?) all to have catastrophic insurance.) So, as Emily Lutella used to say "nevermind."

Darin, Definitely agree that reducing the ability of the insurance companies to game the system would help. What controls would you put in to keep people from gaming it the other way?

Darwin was not dead-on right. But he got a lot of it right. You don't seem capable of comprehending this, so I see no point in expanding upon that point. Considering the Earth appears to be ~4.5B years old, I see little justification to believe life has only existed on this planet for the last 6,000. But feel free to believe whatever it is you want to believe.

It would take far too much time to elaborate well on this. Suffice it to say, I am NOT anti-Darwin. I think that in general species have evolved, but the mechanics and rates at which the evolution occurs do not necessarily match up with his theory. If you knew what you were talking about, you might realize this.

Well, they did. The problem is, they didn't draft 3 OL in the 1st 2 rounds. Sheesh.

I knew that spelling and grammar weren't your fortes. Apparently you have difficulty with meaning as well. Sorry 'bout that.

In general, yes. Specifically as Darwin laid out, no.

John, I apologize. I stated a couple of days ago that you were getting dull. It might just be the beer talking, but this is gold Jerry. You are back on top of your game. Your incoherent babbling is truly gold. How you manage to troll this hard for this long is truly impressive. Even Crayonz has to take a break every once in a while to recharge the batteries/googlebot/whatever. If you aren't trolling, please remember to wear a helmet when you leave your house.

You're mean. But should he earn a Darwin Award, I think that gets him in line with scientific principles of ~60 years ago. So we'd be killing at least 2 birds w/ 1 stone, so to speak. What, you jumped and you died? How the frig are you still posting? No matrix indeed.

Thank God I wasn't drinking coffee when I read that. I'd still be cleaning the monitor when the '16 Games start.

Interesting. No problems at all with forcing people (who may end up having a reaction to the required injection) to inject something into their bodies. All in the name of science. Back about 60 or so years ago, didn't the science say forced sterilizations of retards was the right thing for the population?

Not particularily. Why, does it tell you anything about the motivations of those protesting this? What does it tell you about the motivations of those promoting this?

Squish the f-in' fish I can't stand the f-in' fish Squish 'em squish 'em good