Chilly

Show me where I mentioned this kid? I was talking about your assertion that Hitler, the Holocaust, 911, and other tragedies can't be funny: If you were handicapped, and saw it, you could be offended that it is continuing the "offensive" parking lot jokes that lots of comedians like to tell. You could feel that while you need a close parking lot for a reason, and deserve one, lots of people are attempting to attack you for feeling handicapped. What is funny to one is relative.

My RBs - Cadillac and Droughns. I win today if Gradkowski and Ben Watson suck

i watched the entire game, except for when the Bills scored TDs.

It was, but it was hilarious too

Nice try at spinning it, but if you were handicapped and saw that avatar on an internet forum, would they know you a.) aren't handicapped and b.) aren't making fun of handicapped people? (I think the avatar is funny personally, but there is no difference between that and the other things). You're completely missing the point. Making fun of something is all in the presentation of it. Obviously Hitler and the holocaust in and of themselves aren't very funny things, and neither is the word "Jew", "handicapped", and other various things. Its the way these things are presented which makes it funny.

Obviously liberals never take vacations, they are too busy working and being competent. Kerry had a perfect congressional attendence record, which is why he personally didn't listen to conservative radio.

Of course the Republicans don't want to spend any more money on reconstruction either (based on their actions), so no matter what party is in control its gonna be screwed up.

true_blue - you're right, government's job is to protect us, insofar as our rights are not being violated. Show me where my "right to cancer research funding" is being violated.

Practice what you preach.

Your's is offensive too, bungee jumpers are people too!

One of my favorite scenes that no one remembers - when they pull up in the ice cream truck near the kids, and scare the sh-- out of em with the Bear in the back.

there are so many books where ths is the case, with the original being 1984

Stanford game up 9 points to Navy. 9.

Bingo.

Kazakhstan supports warlord premier george walter bush and our war of terror

I *loved* the movie. My favorite moment has to be when he sh-- in the sack. lmfao. This instantly became one of my favorite movies of all time. Did you guys get the same thing that my theater did? Ours was sold out, but only a few people in the theater laughed at the idiots making racists of themselves - it seemed like a lot of people didn't find it funny.

The movie was FREAKING AWESOME.

Was about to post that myself, heh. Leadership and not splitting a team is even more exacerbated in the QB position.

Haha, that good eh?

Vick - 12 TDs, Brees - 11TDs. Does the league award more points to rushing TDs then passing TDs? If so, keep Vick for sure. Otherwise, its really a tossup. Keep whoever you think gives you the best chance of scoring yardage points (Vick's averaging around 78 yards/game rushing, Brees is averaging 270 yards/game passing).

Personal choice, I guess. I'd take the guys who behave professionally and play like a team over the "ME" guys. A little lesson learned from NE and the Sabres.

That doesn't sound dumb - it happens all the time.

You expect other people that work with him to put up with his behavior? Would you expect this in any other job outside of sports? Your logic works both ways btw, if he was a professional and didn't do the dumb stuff he does, then there wouldn't be any problems.

Way to not post how much you liked it. I can't wait to get out of work and go see it!

Indeed, but as more players come up for renegotiations it'll even out.