Chilly

If we define what "good" means

If you don't get it!!!!! (agree with him) you're WRONG!!!!!!!! NATE CLEMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Also, he knows how to predict the future, with Free Agents and stuff. If you want to take a wait and see attitude, thats no good! Theres gonna be no one available, daquix guaranteed!

Don't bother. He doesn't understand this. I've made the same points in the past, and he just makes up crap as to why this isn't the case.

This has been a huge issue in my classes lol

Their grades for this week = perfect. http://www.billsdaily.com/gameday/2006/gb/grades.shtml

I still don't want Shockey

Green = hippie

I'd be pissed.

Oh yeah, him too

If anyone swears by Zogby they are a moron.

My top 10: 1. OSU 2. Michigan 3. Texas 4. Florida 5. Notre Dame 6. Auburn 7. USC 8. Arkansas 9. Cal 10a. Wisconsin 10b. Louisville Some thoughts: - I've got to say, being at the UT game this weekend, Colt and co impressed me. As people on this board know, I haven't been Colt's biggest fan. Except for one play (where he threw it to a single covered WR instead of a wide open WR for a TD), he didn't make the same mistakes he was prone to making. Great job by him. If Colt keeps this up, I think we can give any team in the country a game. I had Florida tied with Texas because of my lack of faith in Colt, but I think we'd beat em now. - Sorry, Louisville, but you did not impress me vs West Virginia. - Ed's homerism will make me keep Rutgers out of the top 10 if they beat Louisville. - USC is better then Cal. Inconsistent? For sure. - Cal hits 9 just because I don't have faith that either Wisc or Louis would beat em, but it would be close. - Arkansas keeps winning, so they get bumped up, even if it was an ugly win vs Spurrier. - Wisconsin needs some love. The only team they've lost to is Michigan, and they've looked damn good in most of their other games.

I love the Cult, great songs all around. Edit (Ciao baby) was a good song too.

How the hell did they miss She Sells Sanctuary by The Cult?!?

Haven't been following the news lately eh?

http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showforum=14 That is PPP

PPP?

wtf?

Oh hell yeah they do. Don't get me wrong, they want it to happen, I agree with you. I just found it funny that you mentioned that in a post that showed the opposite. The news media likes to give viewers the feeling of intimacy, that people know how the news is really made. Its a great trick to make people feel that they know how the news is made and that there is transparency in the news media when there isn't.

Well, there is a difference - protecting the country from perceived natl security threats can be made as a direct argument to protecting rights. Disease research? Not so much. Most likely its the political reason - Dems don't want to be seen as trying to spent even more money. (course there are also others like whether the majority of the public agrees with it or not, etc)

Um, Pew = independent (and very good) research, not the media. The media's poll (abc news) showed it was getting wider. This kind of undermines your whole argument.

Pew = way, way more trustworthy then the ABC News/Wash Times polls. Anyway, natl polls mean squat

Yes.

Yup, if they had a better defense they'd be the best team in the NFL. Course, its been like that for a few years now.

I thought you were going to say that you found your penis.

http://www.stadiumwall.com/index.php?showtopic=54626