leh-nerd skin-erd

And that’s why I included information dealing with election concerns in 2018. This issue predated 2020 and the end of democracy according to kemp the lesser.

The folks on this board have an increasingly odd habit of pretending to uncover great truth while regurgitating exactly what was said in the text they are replying to. me: “I think Biden would do the same thing as Trump.” kemp, the lesser: “What you’re saying is you think Biden would do what Trump is doing”. I’m saying what I said. It’s clear, unambiguous and direct. I should be applauded for keeping it under 5000 words. By the way, the current approved term is boogeyperson. I included a summary paragraph as to why I’m concerned about election issues. I’m just uncertain why it doesn’t bother you, Kemp. In other words, I’m not sure why it doesn’t bother you. Why are you not concerned about software issues form 2018?

I respect your right to hold a different opinion, but your opinion really doesn’t change anything. My question comes back to “What is there to be afraid of in pursuing lawful challenges to the process?”. For all the handwringing and raging here and online, the message point seems to be he should disregard his rights as a candidate because people think he should. DJT received the courtesy of subterfuge—nothing more and nothing less. From the innuendo of Russian collusion to the expulsion of diplomats by Obama in late December, to the targeting of his administration by the Obama DOJ. As time went on, the scheming got worse, and the attacks became more viscous. There was no courtesy, no honor, and with 70% of republican voters concerned about election fraud (as I read somewhere today), the right choice is to soldier on. Biden and his crew will be fine, as will his supporters. He’s been a VP, a senator and been dialed in to our intelligence agencies for decades.

Very sad to hear—loved my time there as brief as it was.

As a general rule, some of the most dour and uninspiring people on the planet. Btw--heard Australia is doing well with the Covid crisis. True?

I prefer Hulkamaniacs but we're all creatures in God's Kingdom.

Who's treating the SC with deference? Accusations of violent sexual assault, the implication that the most recent nominee was a colonizer, another nominee not getting a hearing, conspiracy theories around the death of one and mockery for another who stayed about 45 days too few.

What's your question? If they feel there was fraud that impacted the election, the way you put your country before party is to allow lawful challenges to proceed. Off the top of my head, both Mitch McConnell and Lindsay Graham support the attempt to clear things up. I think you have it backwards. I feel like you're angry about something that isn't a thing. There's time to see this through, and as I've said before, if you're right, you'll end up in exactly the same spot on 1/20/21 as you would have been without the legal challenge. These things take time.

I based my opinion on the following: He was a key figure in the attempt to unseat DJT with the Russian narrative, implying to me he's a win at all costs and leave 'em bleeding in the street liberal. It was very interesting to me to discover that Biden was fully briefed on the Clinton effort to tie DJT to Russia prior to the 2016 election--based on testimony and documentation involving John In addition, I think it's part and parcel to the Political Bloodsport of the day. I think while it's easy to target DJT because he has decided to pursue his options, I think the sentiment expressed here could just as easily have been the sort of thing Biden would fall back on had he lost: “In 2018 alone, 'voters in South Carolina [were] reporting machines that switched their votes after they'd inputted them, scanners [were] rejecting paper ballots in Missouri, and busted machines [were] causing long lines in Indiana,'” the letter reads. “In addition, researchers recently uncovered previously undisclosed vulnerabilities in "nearly three dozen backend election systems in 10 states." And, just this year, after the Democratic candidate's electronic tally showed he received 164 votes out of 55,000 cast in a Pennsylvania state judicial election in 2019, the county's Republican chairwoman said, "nothing went right on Election Day. Everything went wrong. That's a problem." The letter continued: “These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.” Thanks for the reminder: Germany...check. 1930s...check. Dodged a bullet...check. Lies more than the liar I like...check. Causes civil unrest...check. Ignores pandemic...check. Hate...check. Prayers for a less liarly liar to save us...check. I'm so much smarter than everyone else, why can't people see that...check. The sorrowful angst of liberals. Whatchagonnado?

Germany...check. 1930s...check. Dodged a bullet...check. Lies more than the liar I like...check. Causes civil unrest...check. Ignores pandemic...check. Hate...check. Prayers for a less liarly liar to save us...check. The sorrowful angst of liberals. Whatchagonnado?

This is a fair question. I’d expect Biden to say he’s won in the same scenario, and would expect he would be following the same course of action as DJT is following now. Well, he’d be arguing he beat Bob Dole but other than that, same same.

Exactly.

I remember it well. Personally, I like a vibrant economy and people having jobs and whatnot. That never goes out of style.

I had you on ignore before searching out greener pastures, but I’m glad I read this post. It refects the rare intersection of disparate points of view and how the world works. I agree with you on Lenny—what the f does a guy raising a family and balancing work obligations in an upstate NY community know about deep intelligence dives. Likewise, I’d reject what you might have to say at the time. The only challenge now is explaining why Biden pushed forward. I already know what I think, and it’s consistent with my view on the order of things in Washington. Many people like the status quo because it’s someone else’s job to suffer. A vote for Biden is a vote for that particular world order in spite of angry protestations about a bogus war. It’s not just that of course, but why move forward when you can have the 80s again?

I am not trying to be difficult, but I answered the Biden v Trump/Stern question 3 or 4 times. It wasn’t so much of a tangent as an explanation in regards to your question. I’m inflexible on the Obama/Bush/Biden connection, I recognize that but am comfortable with where I am. It’s one of the main reasons I support DJT and actually getting things done in Washington. As for cancel culture, we’ll have to agree to disagree. Thanks for sharing your thoughts—I understand where you’re coming from.

I wasn’t using Biden’s vote against him, I was laughing at your contention that an appearance on a Howard Stern show was somehow equivalent to an experienced US Senator analyzing all available intelligence and voting to gear up the war machine. I supported the war effort, at least insofar as Saddam Hussein was thumbing his nose at the international community and that lead a reasonable person to believe he was producing weapons of mass destruction. The question isn’t what he said or did then, it’s how it’s viewed through the prism of time. My philosophy on W Bush, who I voted for twice and politics in general has evolved over the years. Pre-Trump, I was headed down the road that there really are just some major players calling the shots, keeping people like you and me swinging at each other. Bill Clinton. Obama hires Hillary, Hillary is the heir apparent. HW Bush. W Bush. Jeb Bush. It made me a bit nauseous to be honest. So, as I said earlier before another scurrilous attack, I watched folks on your side get all lathered up with BHO’s Hope N Change shtick. He ran in the W is a war criminal platform, then quietly all is forgotten. Dude, I’m asking you—was W Bush the war for oil guy or not? And if he was, why the f didn’t Obama steamroll him using the full might and power of the Oval Office? Today though, thick as theives, W suggesting Biden is a man of character. The problem is, I recall what Biden said about him—was it true what this man if character said? Anyway, same questions exist with Biden, he was part of the game then, the war in retrospect was a massive mistake and I think he needs to answer on it. I do not think DJT on Stern reveals anything, has nothing to do with anything, and is a silly talking point. I needed no additional reasons to think he’s unfit for office. I’ve moved further down the road that there aren’t Ds and Rs, just shades of the same ***** color. The fact that 70m people voted for an over-ripened Joe Biden for president—one laughed off the stage when he first ran decades ago during the Pet Rock era, convinces me even more. As for Das Enemies List, I feel the way I do because these people destroy lives for sport.

This is ominous. I miss so much along the way. Is any comment re: the C word as it relates to player availability a ban-worthy offense? I’ll try and make my point but will steer clear just in case. I thought the D played pretty well for most of the game, given the players that were missing due to pulled groins. It’s tough to lose important players due to pulled groins, and it sucks that other guys with with unpulled groins have to sit. It’s impossible to know if the players we were missing might have made an impact if their groins were not pulled— but when all was said and done, the game was exciting right to the end. It is the NFL—as usual we left too many points off the board and this time, it cost us. Great write up Virgil. Thank you.

You’re asking me to ignore the fact that he took multiple shots at me, and implying I somehow owe him respect in some way/shape/form you deem appropriate. That’s some first level Taylor Swift-angsty-fake-nice bs. I decline your request. What I wrote was historically accurate. The fact that he acknowledged what I was saying while implying I was making something up simply resulted in me responding the way I like to respond—I mocked him. As for your characterization of DJT, whatever. Btw—The fixation on a poster long gone from this site is troubling. Let the anger go.

The Crane Technique of “this ain’t over.” damn you.

You asked a question, then as if realizing on some subconscious level it was a dumb question, you powered through common sense and answered it for me on my behalf? Was your intention to reveal the silliness of my position by hilighting the accuracy of it? Well done? Thank you? Go So Tier? I engaged when you appeared ready, moving you from the children’s table to the where the adults sit, but it’s impossible to ignore that you’re still eating your mashed potatoes with your fingers. Be that as it may, enjoy the day (and the mashed pos)!

This isn’t over.

You know I’m a fan of your work, but Ima need to see your medical license at some point. Something is not right here. Before proceeding, you’re a medical doctor, not a Doctor of Metaphysical Interpretation, Doctor of The Universe, The Love Doctor or anything like that? I just want to be clear before the rage sets in.

Just laying around, flies buzzing around. This stinks.

It’s still funny this morning. Howard Stern uncovers the secret vote of DJT that started the Iraq war.

Well, Hillary’s actions might well have reached the standard of being illegal, but that ship sailed long ago. As for Governor Whitmer, many people are rightly concerned with governmental overreach and the destruction of their lives and livelihood. To my knowledge, none of the people in the crowd had any legal capacity to bring charges against her. AOC is positioned quite well to directly and personally impact the lives of people she disagrees with politically. Her personal financial situation is not impacted whatsoever by a shutdown whether it lasts 30 days or 30 months. Politicians and enemies lists have a long and dark history in American politics.