leh-nerd skin-erd

Agreed about the right to protest, and I respect that he took the time to go. However, beyond that one of the other great things about America is the absolute, inalienable right for one guy to bust the balls of another guy for any reason at any time. Besides, Fergie has directed some mockery my way, and I didn’t need some Amish school marm librarian to come up in here and chastise him on my account*. *More ball busting here, Andy, I don’t think you’re really an Amish school marm librarian.

He also said something that Fergs was unable to hear due to the crowd numbering in the tens to low twenties. It could have been “Wow, I’m really low on gas” or something sinister like “Get a grip.”. Best to assume it was more menacing dialogue. That one is pretty funny.

Oh boy, you've spun quite a tale here. You're a regular Robert Pudlum. Anyway, the record is clear. You chose fealty over common sense, weaponization over free and fair elections, and in the end, left the country weaker for your effort. The bright spot is that sensible and fair-minded people ultimately got wise to the game and pushed back. Had anyone in your camp paid attention to the masses, dialed down the Biden...Mueller...Smith...Willis...Brag coordination, chances are pretty good Trump isn't a player in 2025. Admittedly, he might still have had a shot when you simpletons hitched your wagon early to JB. Yikes.

“It will be different, next time.”

Is months misspelled as minutes?

There's nothing to acknowledge other than you see politics afoot when you don't like the result, and purity when you do. I used your standard--professionals with experience dealing with questions of obstruction reviewed the Mueller report in detail, considered the options and made a decision. No obstruction. No need for a grand jury. Time to move on. That you wanted more political theater is understandable, but the issue was resolved and that particular silliness was laid to rest.

You didn’t initially mention the menacing nature of the “Get a life” commentary, but in this retelling he sounds quite bloodthirsty and seems to be a regular scoundrel. It’s interesting that he was run off by a successful lady who blew him a kiss, but I guess that’s kryptonite to menacing pick up truck drivers. Don’t underestimate the impact of taking the timid and moderates out to the local Dairy Queen after a long day of protesting fascism. You get ‘em a choc/vanilla twist in cherry dip, they’re voting Kamala 2028.

I think you're occasionally full of baloney, making up stories to fit a narrative. That's your MO. It's possible I'm wrong, of course, but your pickup truck story seems likely to fall into this category. It's in the details of the story---the obligatory pickup truck, the angry man yelling "Get a life", your apparent literal interpretation and declaration that she actually has a life...and the successful lady blowing a kiss causing the the guy to "floor it" out of there. Sounds like a bad screenplay from a 1970s B movie. If I'm incorrect, kudos to her for having a life. The commentary offered by the pickup truck guy was pretty banal and harmless, but certainly resembles liberal tendencies about people being in cults and worshipping orange people. Glad everyone made it out safely.

Understandable-all the great protests in the past came after a minimum 5 days planning and occurred on sunny days with temps running between 55-62, wind out of the south-southwest at 5 mph or less. Glad to hear you had fun, but your story about the guy in the truck sounds…implausible. This fellow in the truck, let’s call him Earl, his big gotcha was “Get a life!”, and blowing him kisses caused him to “floor it” Dukes of Hazard style? What does her being quite accomplished and successful have to do with the story? How would he know that?

Of course, if AG Barr had written all that, we wouldn’t need you to create your own painfully flawed analysis of what he actually wrote. In the meantime, we can just roll with what he shared publicly. He is, after all, a “lawyer who does this stuff” on quite a high level. Yet, here we are, the good and decent people of the country having access to information rejected just about all you claim to know and think, the heavy-handed politicization of the type of government you support, and the silliness of the Russian narrative. No obstruction. No coordination. No collusion.

I’m not a lawyer, nor have I claimed to work on obstruction cases. I do believe that lawyers have different opinions, different motivations and justice isn’t always just. What do you think these words mean? “After reviewing the Special Counsel's final report on these issues; consulting with Department officials, including the Office of Legal Counsel; and applying the principles of federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.” Spoiler alert: They are not from “Twitter”, which hasn’t been “Twitter” in quite some time.

These are weasel words, designed to target influence low information voters. It worked.

I do not believe Mueller was a beacon of integrity, to quote nedleyboy. I see a political fabrication and ultimately nothing to support attempting to destroy the integrity of a legitimate election where your person lost. I believe Bill Barr was 100% correct on the political persecution angle, believed it then, believe it now. Given the information released thus far on wrongdoing by Obama/Clinton/Buden and the rest, I’m surprised you’re still clinging to your version of political religion. You align nicely with the corruption crowd that wants to move to authoritarian rule. #myopic

I absolutely understand why you would not trust Trump, and he’s not a beacon of integrity. I simply pointed out when Putin moved, and who was in office at the time. Your response is typical of the liberal response to that issue. It’s an inconvenient truth.

@Niagara Bill When we were kids, we had a lot of trouble getting over the Peace Bridge on the weekends with all the traffic. This invasion is going to take forever if we haven’t seen an increase in accessibility in the last 50-60 years. Citizenship? US, we’re not MAGA tho. Where are you going today? Toronto, maybe Ottawa, eventually. Reason for your visit today? Stones Concert. Anything to declare? 25 guys in camo in the back, buncha M1s, M26s, some surface to air missles, the usual stuff. Fruit….you have any fruit back there? That’s a berry fair question—we appleslootly have no fruit in the vehicle lol. We don’t do fruit humor, sir. We’re Canadian. Sorry, no. No fruit. Have a nice day.