leh-nerd skin-erd

Community garden?

Obviously, this is why we all tipped the glass to Madame Kamala on election night. It's sort of sad she missed it, bro!

Clinton playing fast and loose with national security is a matter of public record (and to be sure you don't drift off and confuse me with someone else--Clinton was not charged, was never going to be charged, and 55pc of the way through Trump's admins has not been charged). I'm really not certain how you missed that, but you appear grossly misinformed about all that. I'm surprised. DJT played fast and loose with classified material, and I thought that an unforced error on his part. i said that at the time the DOJ was raiding his house. I think he should have returned the classified documents when the Biden DOJ demanded it, knowing full well the democrats would go all out to put him away for life given the chance. he shouldn't have given them the chance, though they likely would have moved anyway. At the same time I was suggesting DJT made a mistake on the classified documents issue, I suggested that the number of high ranking officials in possession of classified documents/material was likely near 100%, and some criticism was thrown my way. A short time later, Joe Biden magically found records from his time as VP and Senator, clearly in violation of the law. In the end, it really just seems like mishandling classified documents was business as usual until it involved Trump. I believe most sensible Americans saw the disconnect, saw the inequity of the Biden DOJ, and pushed many to vote for Trump.

I have never suggested she was, has, or will be charged. Quite the opposite, in fact. You are approaching a cognitive breakdown of Joe Bidenesque proportions.

I can get caught up in a good story like anyone else, but while occasionally curious, I'm almost always cautious. It's been my default for most of my life. Part of the reason I have enjoyed this forum is the exchange of ideas, some mundane, some out there a bit, and I've seen it from both sides of the aisle. I try not to get too deep on things that require major leaps of faith. I'm honestly less impacted by some of the stuff that was shared here (and always enjoyed interacting with DR and the rest of the folks who left), more on some of the crazy #### that passes for "that's just the way we do things in Washington". I know we've beaten it to death...but Trump facing prison and what amounts to a life sentence over concerns about classified documents v Biden taking/securing documents over many years in office (and none with even the question of a President's ability to declassify broadly) and it being a minor speed bump in his political legacy far outshines any thoughts on Epstein and the like.

Those were some good times. I miss 'em!

I am not on Twitter, the format is obnoxious. For many tweets, its akin to hearing your neighbor yammer on at their kitchen table as you walk by their house "Herb" is a no go, at least for now, though one never knows what the future holds. I'm happy to consider your point of view, you've provided insight in the past I found useful, but so far you have incorrectly characterized my position on that issue, called me delusional, and suggested Twitter and/or herb and/or other dark forces have poisoned my mind. Here's what I have: Hillary Clinton played fast and loose with national security. Her biggest supporters acknowledged she was reckless and careless, to say nothing of her fiercest critics. The resulting fallout was quite predictable even without James Comey's statement. Besides insults and conspiracy theories of poisoned minds, what else do you have?

Holy cow. I started the weekend thinking I’m a conservative looking for common sense and efficiency in government and realize I’m a Reichan liberal? What a whirlwind!

All of that is swell…blaming Trump for 4 years of Biden’s presidency, that’s what party loyalists do, they blame the other guy. Still, Biden and by decree, Harris, lost the faith of the American people. Or, at least enough to disagree with your “Trump maybe a little Biden mostly Trump we need more time with Harris” perspective and Trump was elected 47. You must be cranky because of the heat—turn up the AC while you still have it! “Lock her up” was a silly chant, and it had nothing to do with supporting that or not. Unlike most believers in unicorns riding on rainbows, I believe some people are clearly above the law. HRC falls into that camp, though “Lock her up” certainly was a big part of the first Trump win. Don’t blame me for that, Sec, blame Clinton and her people. Blame failure to vet the candidate thoroughly. Complete unforced error, you should know that by now. Take your blinders off, maybe even blame yourself for allowing the same people to select your candidates. And you keep sticking with Joe Biden blathering on about killing Medicare, feigning confusion on how all that classified material got in the trunk of his muscle car, completely mishandling the border, and believing you were instrumental in anointing Harris, who quite inexplicably, was somehow less likable than HRC. Keep rolling with all that, you have really figured out how to keep Republicans in charge. I’ll repeat. If the economy is humming, Team R rolls on and keeps winning. If the economy is in the tank—and Dems will do everything with their power to tank it—-you’ll get your shot again. That’s probably a good thing —-you seem to have a deep bench of god-awful candidates even voters in your own party can’t stomach.

When you stop and think about it, he’s probably not uncorrect. Flip everything around and we could be looking at a completely different outcome in the election. Though, if you flip it back again, we’re back where we started.

You keep repeating yourself, I know you asked him to do something, and know what he said in response. That you don’t follow the flow is odd. I don’t know anything about the other posters you’re talking about, but I don’t think you’re condemned for posting about alleged pamphlets on an alleged trailhead. I think you’re chided for telling tall tales and as a result, some posters don’t believe you.

Would you describe Susan, or Suze as she might have been called, as quiet? If so, could it be because you were there at different times?

And yet I was able to discern his response to your questions while you’re in a state of perpetual confusion. Besides, if you don’t buy what he writes why bother asking him to write something. It’s odd.

Well, Biden was clearly not in control of anything, inflation is was kicking strong…and he was running (or at least whomever was running the DOJ) an authoritarian regime seeking to imprison his main rival while having a multitude of peccadilloes of his own—and enough fair minded people knew what was happening and rejected it. Soundly. It was an historic implosion but the economy was a big part of it, and you support people who weren’t trusted.

He told you why he wasn’t going to comply with your request. He was quite clear. It really seems like your cognitive skills are Bidenesque.