GG

Is Watkins' value to the Bills greater as a WR catching passes from Tyrod Taylor or as the final piece of the puzzle to get a franchise QB?

Not overripe tuna in Florida.

I think McGillicuddy would take offense at being called a soldier

Yes, it's Goldman Sachs' fault.

Rewind the conversation to 2007

In 2007, Vanek was thought of as a potential HOF

If you're asking this question you already lost

Does this bring back Capt McCillucuddy?

Let's play the way back machine. Knowing what you know, would you let the Sabres match the Oilers offer sheet for Vanek in 2007?

Dawkins was featured too

I think his point is that the bots originate the threads and pass them along to the "like-minded" real people who have a history of passing such news along (based on an algorithm), and voila you have a story going viral.

Most definitely Cannonball Run. But not as good as Gumball Rally. What's behind me, is not important.

So when is the next shoe dropping? What will it look like? 1984? Brazil? Logan's Run? Minority Report? Porky's?

Looks like Abedi's ISIS training story has died on the vine. why hasn't anyone followed up on the initial scoops if the media is parroting the official line that ISIS is the ultimate evil? As for Russia, my hate is backed by numbers. Whenever that country decides to stick its nose into other people's affairs lots of people die. A lot of people die. For all your warnings about USA's meddling in Mid East, the global war and collateral casualties kept declining through the mid 2000's. Suddenly there was a reversal around 2008. What happened? Which brings us back to the reality you continue to ignore. Somehow in your mind, USA's foreign policy between 2008 and 2016 is evocative of what that foreign policy is, even though it was a huge departure from any administration in the last 100 years, other than Jimmy Carter's, and after both of those disasters, the US and the world paid a heavy price. So no, there is no Deep State war. There's still a large army of Obama holdovers at every level of the administrative state that Trump has been too stupidly slow to get rid of. It would be like McDermott starting his big makeover, but still having Dennis Thurman and Rob Ryan putting his plan in place. Now add at least another 25

Russia is having a grand old time in throwing the intelligence community and the media for a loop. The masters of the misinformation campaigns are certainly affecting the nightly news conversations, but they're nowhere near affecting the policy. I smell a desperation in the air. Greggy focuses on the arms deal that Saudis signed, but the bigger loss was not getting them to increase oil production. So, if Vlad goes after Jared, watch the Donald promote Dakotas' oil and hyper charge Keystone construction. Drill baby, drill.

Am I supposed to be ashamed that I hate a regime that's responsible for 100 million murders and wartime deaths? Really? You know who else took inspiration from Russia?

Name them all.

That should be fun.

Then, it's not really Wall Street that's the primary causality of the job migrations.

How does Wall Street make more money with less income flowing through the system?

What in the world are you talking about? Since when does Wall Street benefit from more unemployment?

Probably a different thread topic. But as has been brought up countless times, if you're under 55 yrs old and don't recognize that this is a much different economic environment than your parents, then you are among the world's biggest idiots. It was easy for the US industrial base to provide working incentives to its workforce when US was the world's manufacturer. The party ended in the '70s. It shouldn't be a shock to anyone paying attention.

I'll venture that you'll start posting pictures of Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam or remind everyone that Bin Laden used to benefit from USA's help to fight Russians in Afghanistan. Yet, while it's been pointed out to you that the alliances in Syria are anything but symmetrical, you cling to the naive notion that if US aid ends up in the wrong hands or helps the wrong group is tantamount to direct US involvement. And you go through great length to express false outrage at what the US is doing, despite clear facts that USA's involvement saves lives. You continue to ignore the very basic premise that the main reason the US finds itself in the current predicament is because US followed the exact hands-off foreign policy that you think will work. Look at the link I provided. There was a noticeable trend of decreasing combat related casualties through 2008, and then a rising trend. Now, a smart guy like you can connect the dots to see which country decreased its foreign involvement in 2008 and which country increased it. Which UN Security Council member fought to the last minute foreign intervention in the Bosnian genocide? But go ahead, and keep defending your annointed protectors of mankind.

So you finally admit that you think the CIA blew up little girls in Manchester. Bravo. And of course, I'm going to ask you again to provide proof that our constitutional rights have been eviscerated. You know who else expressed his wars in Victorian terms?

Yet the data also shows that this is a period of peace in historic terms, health stats excluded.