GG

This forum isn't suited for the snowflakes. This isn't Facebook where you get unlimited likes for reposting brainless drivel. Think before you post and be ready to defend your posts.

Typical vacuous response. Death panels were discussed if the government took over the insurance market. Which hasn't happened, yet. But I understand how someone of your intellect could get confused by facts. Bern, baby, bern.

No it isn't. Like everything else in his life, Trump at that ceremony needed the continuing affirmation that a mirror provides, just like all thin skinned narcissists do.

He won't be a dingbat if people stop responding to his crap.

Were you this up in arms when Obamacare was going to cut $650 billion from Medicare? Don't you care about old people? Only if they punch above their weight.

Anybody wonder why nobody was reporting that the big "cost savings" in Obamacare were to come from cutting $650 billion from Medicare?

Now Deutsche bank is a Russian stooge?

What % of them are on teams that initially drafted them?

You can tell he's a good kid because he didn't send you pictures of his football camp with EJ.

If Ford is saying that for the Barrons crowd, it means they're full of crap. They're just talking bull **** to get their valuation up by hitting the right buzzwords and make it seem that they're not dinosaurs. But in reality, they do not subscribe to the theory that people won't own cars in the future. And then a QVC pitchman.

Baloney. The stats you're probably referring to are invalid. Ride sharing proponents love to claim that cars are underutilized 97% of the time. That may be true in the aggregate, but the problem is that the 3% utilization is by everybody at the same time. So the cost-effectiveness of not owning a car goes out the window. Ride sharing will have an impact on 2nd - 3rd card ownership rates in families, but they will not displace primary car ownership.

All goalies are weird. But Pang singled this guy out before the draft even started. Good value in late 2

It's "unprecedented" because your friendly allies in the press have highlighted their interference in much more detail in 2016 than they did in 2008 or 2012. But carry on with your pity party

Why should it be a problem? Their heart is in the right place.

The best part of the story Pete is that you helped influence the kid. Great job.

Not Raiders, LA. AFC signifies Bills play the AFC teams in those cities.

And that what makes his negotiating stance inexplicable. As of now, only Bills gave him an offer. If he was worth a few million more, somebody would have ponied up an amount higher than Buffalo's low ball offer. Yet nobody has, which establishes his market at the vet minimum.

Exactly. That's what's confusing on why he's holding out. Doesn't sound like there's a team that's met his asking price and I doubt a team will go up a few million more if a starting TE goes down in training camp.

Still doesn't make sense to me. If he and Bills are really far apart, that means he and Jags are even further apart if they're his #1 choice.

Right on cue. Perfect time to pick on Rosenstein

Hmm. There used to be a legendary poster here named Bob Lamb. Then he disappeared

He's also referring to the reps that Peterman will get in practice. Doesnt sound like McD is running parallel drills to give more reps to the qbs. So by that virtue alone Peterman will get less chance than Yates to claim the job.

Tom handled the foreign policy aspects, but another big accommodation was economic. The press lapped up Obama's role in pushing for sanctions, which weren't really effective in hurting Russia. Saudi Arabia did far more harm by maintaining its oil output, which earned it a spot on Russia's hit list. And in six months, Trump's moves to expand US energy production is putting a major hurt on Russia's only viable industry. That alone should shut the morons up that Trump is a Russian plant. If he was, he'd go even further than Obama did in killing domestic oil & gas production and distribution. Yet, he went 180 from the prior policies.

He had the rep because he was a smallish, offensive minded defenseman in a league that still valued hulking guys who couldn't move. Erik Carlsson would also be considered soft by 1980's standards.

Is that Newt & Kelso separated at birth?