GG

You know them personally?

So if it were that simple, why did Obama elect to go down the illegal route of telling DoJ not to enforce an existing law instead of getting his pen and phone out to reclassify pot?

You don't know what they were, but you know 5 of them were dancing on the roof?

5 Mossad agents or 5 NYC Jews?

Another faux libertarian chimes in. Maybe now you're getting. Making and changing laws is a cumbersome process by design. Don't like the law? Work on changing it through the established process.

Tell me one person who died by driving fast? Not driving off the road, or hitting a tree, post, another vehicle, etc. Just by driving fast.

Driving 150MPH on a straight highway in a car and tires designed for that speed is safer than inhaling fumes from a flower.

Prohibition was a stupid law that was repealed. Work on electing people to Congress to repeal federal laws governing pot. My car has a max speed over 150MPH. Can I argue that I shouldn't be pulled over if I exceed the speed limits, because the car can handle it, I'm in full control of the vehicle and pose no danger to others?

Good one. Did you hear the one where Mossad alerted all NYC Jews to stay home on the second Tuesday of September 2001?

Don't people realize that there's a higher probability to re engineer Jim Kelly's body to play for the Bills next year than to land Jimmy G?

If only Darin would have applied this

Time to exorcise that damned shuttle pass

Who are they, other than a murderous death cult?

If I understand you correctly Victoria Nuland ran the entirety of the foreign policy operation for the Obama administration, and that makes his administration captive to neocons. And why do you keep harping on Nuland? Oh, that’s right - she provided verbal assistance to the Ukranian government that was overrun by Russian operatives. Funny how you fail to cheer anyone who wants to free themselves from the Russian yoke. And before you chime in with your wrongful assertion that CIA provoked the Russians through Ukranian proxies, you should check the timelines of exactly when the provocations started and who started it. Lastly, are we to believe that a Shiite regime that’s survived nearly 40 years through insurrections, wars, sanctions and a concerted US effort to undermine it, but now also armed with gifted billions from Obama, is suddenly on the verge of collapse within a month of a Sunni prince jailing some of his cousins? It was really that easy and simple? Who knew?

One staffer of a one term Secretary of State, who was neutered by Obama's flunkies is your evidence that neocons controlled foreign policy? M'kay. No, the difference between you and me is that I don't believe in a shadowy conspiratory cabal that is running the country or the world. If that were the case, you wouldn't have such wild swings in policy and actions. Funny how you cling to the DoD build up after 2001 as evidence of Deep State power, but ignore the "peace dividend" that gutted the DoD between 1992 and 2000. If Executive didn't have the power as you claim, there's no way DoD budget goes below 3%

Only in your world did the neocons have any say in foreign policy during Obama's administration. Trump's foreign policy is a hell of a lot closer to Bush's last term, and that's why the dominoes started falling again. But keep looking for the connections where there aren't any, such as Lybia. Please square the neocon argument for a leading US role in world affairs and leading from behind? That should be a good long explanation. BTW, given your obsession with the deep state and personal enrichment that was driving decisions, which three countries were the biggest opponents of the second Iraq invasion? And what happened to the leaders of those three countries after they left power and where did their money come from?

Does Andre have a house in Dunkirk? PS - that is a massive indictment of the organization to rank him that highly, which was followed by the domino logic of selecting EJ, who was clearly better than Ponder.

oh why not?

He also said Bills aren't interested in Rosen. So which one is it?

So when you're saying that Americans don't have the appetite, what you're projecting is the Twitter generation that needs instant gratification (including you). Recognizing that tectonic change to ruling regimes take more than one election cycle, only knee jerk reactionaries were expecting a final resolution overnight, instead of at least a decade. If you were here during the discussions in the early 2000's and surrounding the war, you'd also hear the timelines discussed at that time were about the 2020's, and not something sooner. Considering that the neocon theory was framed around the success of the democratization and westernization of post-war Germany, Japan & Korea, I would firmly count those as resounding success stories. But since you don't have the capacity to look at this situation objectively, by consistently tying neocons to serving other interests (without ever identifying what those interests are) and consistently distorting reality to suit your deranged narratives, this discussion will go nowhere. But I will ask this, do you for a second think that these 2018 Iranian protests would have occurred if the 2009 protests did not take place, if the Arab Spring never happened, and if there was no Iraq invasion? And if there's no correlation among those, what is the catalyst?

The entire block was recently razed, but maybe he survived?

This is not going to dispel the "Media's Infatuation with Kyle" meme

Dear lord, instead of typing all of that, all you had to do is type "Halliburton" 100 times and saved a lot of effort. Talk about a distorted view.

I know, where are there still newsstands? I wonder what happened to them?

Or dressed as a beer vendor at Gillette.