GG

To avoid a sack, did he throw the ball away to defenders, like Peterman, or to a totally uncatchable place?

No, he cried because the tweets from 5 yrs ago could cost him millions of dollars now.

You mean they have big shoes to fill

If that was the reason, then why didn't they do that over last 20 yes?

Watching both broadcasts, and I can't recall the last time they devoted so much time to Bills choices on each network.

Ridley?

I'm glad I'm not a poker player

Yup

They're just asking that question today?

Funny. Never go around that bend. Always turn on Maple

As if we need another J Rosen in our life?

You only fail something that's within your control

What in the world are you blabbering about now? Or is this another case where you're jumping into a 4-yr old ongoing discussion, without knowing the context?

Flip the decision - should Gettelman trade 3 first rounders and another high pick to draft Barkley? Would anyone? It's a deal like that which got Ditka fired.

Because it's familiar to you, especially when you have to think.

That should work for all 3 teams, as has been discussed. Giants staying pat at #2 and not picking a QB is a fireable offense.

Then if they don't trade out, Gettelman deserves to be fired on the spot.

Shefty may know more because he's looped in with the agents, who may have heard from Browns

If that happens, then I can certainly see Bills trading back down from 12, adding another 1st in 2019 and borrowing the tank from Harborside.

You could be looking at a 5 win season in 2018. That 2019 draft pick is very valuable. Bills can get a veteran MLB in FA next year who will be much better than anyone who will be available at #22 this year.

Why would they do that? It would eliminate their only taking point.

Right on cue

Does this mean that you will also be celebrating some dead Russians?

The internal pressure in Ukraine was coming from the people, not State, and certainly not a neocon agenda. Langley's presence in East Europe has been cut back since 44's election, not increased. The forces in State you're referencing were purged in 44's first few months, that you've continued to ignore in every thread. The forces-that-were who were the brains in the Iranian strategy partnered with actual Jihadists - not to stop the Russians but to fan the flames in the hopes of sparking a larger conflict or to establish the Sunni order to hold back the Shia infiltration. The goal in Ukraine is to let the people - who do not want the Russians controlling their life - to dictate their own future. Not to impose a vision upon them, and not partnering with the redux of the despotic Soviet regime in order to do so.

So suddenly the forces in State who are pursuing a neocon agenda in Iran are the good guys. But they were bad when they tried to do the same in Ukraine? And if you are going to counter with different players, why have you ignored to point out on whose side the Podesta Group was in that conflict?