Ramius

i love the last reply in the thread...

Its the 3 or 5 "free passes" that we all get. If you or your S.O. ever gets the chance to sleep with one of the people on your list people, you cant really fault them for it, or give them a hard time.

Well, that would have ended the series pretty damn fast.

Amen! I call bull sh-- as well! I wonder what kind of sh-- moose is smoking. As stated before, the majority of the "ghoulish" experiments were done in the 50's, 60's, 70's etc before the ACUC were formed at research institutes. I have done extensive research with animals as well, and the amount of paperwork and approval process you need is through the roof. Also as you said, my bosses have alays been up my ass to get the experiment done with as few animals as possible, because of the insane cost of doing animal research. No animal gets wasted, and there are no "redundant" experiments. I dont know of a sinle professor that will spend $25 per rat at the bare minimum for a "redundant" experiment. But, like a lot of people, moose isnt going to let facts get in the way of a good rant. Its much easier to toss out big words to scare the people, like "horseradish peroxidase" and make them sound bad when they are not at all harmful. Thats much easier than thinking for yourself and actually finding out whats going on. Someone can tell you i used to paralyze rats with sodium pentobarbital, and it sounds bad. I can tell you we used it as a general anesthetic, and the rats are up and running around within a few hours. doesnt sound as bad now does it?

take your gun

Fank Caliendo far and away does the best madden and george bush impersonations.

makes you wonder sometimes if its a cycle feeding itself. A radio announcer has to talk abotu the bills, and there isnt much in the media except the same old "we dumped moulds and milloy and have an 80-yr old GM so we'll suck. So said announcer checks some message boards for some hot topics to discuss, sees rumors, and repeats said rumors. Message board members hear this, and up the posting on a subject, leading to more potential discussion. lather, rinse, repeat. Something comes out fo nothing.

Thank you! using Holcombs arm lahjik, i should stop eating ice cream, because ice cream consumption is highly correlated to drowning deaths. Never mind that the only reason they are correlated is because both activities are high in the summer. They are correlated, so one must cause the other! Do not ice cream or you will drown!!!

You havent seen much preseason then, where KH has looked out of sorts and confused with the new offense.

You arguement is still assinine. So spending high draft choices on the OL doesnt correlate to winning (notice i said correlate, not cause, a concept you have a lot of trouble grasping), but spending high draft choices on players that eventually turn out to be good does correlate to winning. simplifying: drafting players and OL that are good improves your team. No sh-- sherlock! Congrats, you've proved nothing! you've just spewed more assinine nonsense. kinda like every other post of yours.

Nah, if i saw about that had even the slimmest, slightest positive thing to say about the 2006 draft from bill, then i'd dial 911.

bull sh--! JLH actually has some curves now. before she was a stick with a rack. now shes got a nice ass and some real woman curves on her body. then again maybe its just me, but i have never condisidered visible ribs under a big rack very attractive.

This is one of the biggest lines of sh-- i have heard in a long time. You are telling me the biggest difference in the bills going 9-7 and 5-11 from 2004 to 2005 ws the fact we had no 1st rounders on the line? Perhaps you didnt see the difference in our defense last year. But according to you, we would have been better off keeping mike williams this year, because he was a first rounder. It would have meant more wins You use statistics like a lot of people, you use them to make your point, and ignore the data that disproves your point. Also, in numerous threads by you, you forget 1 main point. Correlation does NOT mean causation.

This might help... http://www.buffalobills.com/ read news item #1

Anyone PM this to holcombs arm yet?

Two things i cant stand about Madden, and they still havent fixed them, are... 1) when you are about to sack their QB, they "drop" the ball, and its ruled an incomplete pass. I've had numerous sacks negated by this. 2) when you are attempting to pass the ball, and instead of throwing it, the QB tucks it back in the middle of the throwing motion and takes the sack.

Well, i am !@#$ed either way with comcast. I'd hafta upgrade to the digital cable package (from $40 basic to $70) to get NFL network. Comcast doesnt offer it with regular cable, only digital. I hate comcast.

3300 pass yards, 20 pass TD, 3 rush TD, 19 INT, 55% completion.

I read it the same way. The arguement is or, so as long as you arent in violation of 1 or the rules, you are ok. I take it to mean 3 dogs and 4 cats is ok, but anything else is over the limit. And the people that are on homeowners boards can rot in hell.

willis doesnt need an o-line to run for 2000 yards.

The current gen systems madden '07 have more game play features than the 360. Also, rumor is that ea may charge for you to download the alternate jerseys on the 360.

I thought the special ed class only got to use the computers on thursdays?

Nope. Thought Nance was an intriguing prospect because of his size compared to our other WR's and his decent career in college. No skin off my ass because he got cut. He'll probably end up on our PS. But i am glad your life is more validated because you can brag on an internet message board that you were correct about a UDFA getting cut. Your friends will be impressed at your ability to trash talk on the internet. You may even impress the 7th graders too!

Congrats. I guess you and LaDaris will be stocking up on the tissues and vaseline today?

The most appropriate time to yell fore would be right before you move the engine in your front yard.