Joe Ferguson forever

https://archive.ph/84UIz perhaps you should give it more thought.

In that case, why wouldn't Patel attempt to prosecute them more vigorously? If they were part of the FBI, proving it would advance the maga "deep state" theme.

A word can evoke different meanings to different people. That's up to the interpreter in much the same way as a piece of art or music can. However, in this case we have a well accepted definition (from Websters): ban 1 of 3 verb ˈban banned; banning; bans Synonyms of ban transitive verb 1 : to prohibit especially by legal means ban discrimination Is smoking banned in all public buildings? also : to prohibit the use, performance, or distribution of ban a book ban a pesticide The fact hat Websters chose to include an example about all public buildings illustrates that a ban is possible only in some. Schools are public buildings. Therefore there can be bans in some schools. additionally, some schools prohibit certain books by legal means. Therefore they ban them. The only pertinent premise that you present towards your conclusion is the logos part. and it is invalid. The rest are semantic red herrings. It's a much more simple argument than you present. Perhaps you can diagram it for us.

“What makes you think” was a question to “doc” but thanks for reminding me where I proved his fraud. He thought I was a neurologist. I’m not. But I have seen demented patients 100s of times your stalking is slightly unsettling. After criticizing the topic, you post in it insufferably

they may not legally need it. practically they do. they won't risk starting ww3 without US approval.

pretty certain commandant patel doesn't list this as a priority after all the other traitors were pardoned.

i know what he was quoted saying. ambiguous as always but initially giving his stamp of approval of NATO shooting down planes in their airspace but saying it would depend on circumstances whether the US gets involved. Did you read something else?

Seems like trump is already in neck deep https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/23/politics/trump-nato-countries-russian-aircraft

I think he’s just pointing out trump’s frequent association with modest girls https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/donald-trump-melania-trump-knauss-first-lady-erections

Isn’t polymarket a betting site? isn’t this discussed in a thread where it’s relevant?

He doesn’t give any specific citations up to the point I had to stop. Why not original link on a statistician or author of a paper on replication theory? Save everyone time and put you in a better light.

It’s a cult.

He is the source. Why not directly link to his primary source. I couldn’t bring myself to listen to a libertarian, Fox News economist.

Denmark thinks it might just be… https://metro.co.uk/2025/09/24/drones-spotted-yet-another-danish-airport-sparking-delays-cancellations-24255213/

I’m not the one trying to redefine “banned”.

So why would you use him to further your argument? By definition, you used appeal to authority fallacy.

Whether you think I’m weird is irrelevant and i couldn’t care less. If article 4 is declared the next step is discussion with other member nations. Trump would certainly have input.

Too much for the middle class https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2025/09/25/middle-class-americans-economy-consumer-confidence/86316163007/

Yes, this was very, ahem, revealing.

Banned in schools. If non vaxed personnel were only banned in a few hospitals, would they not still be banned?

They are banned in schools. Not enough for you?

It has everything to do with it. We have the world’s best military and trump is commander in chief. If he doesn’t cooperate with NATO the calculus changes dramatically.

https://www.pnj.com/story/news/education/2023/09/22/florida-leads-nation-in-book-bans-full-list-of-banned-books/70934406007/

Couldn’t trump refuse to participate with NATO on a strike against Russian provocations? He’s made it abundantly clear that he’s not a big fan

So, not a red herring. He can order it.