-
Posts
4,698 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Billz4ever
-
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Billz4ever replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
Now I guess there's some debate whether getting a toe tap down constitutes an additional step, but even if we say it doesn't, he still did tuck it away, which is also considered a football move. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Billz4ever replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
OK, let's say it doesn't. Tucking the ball away does and he did that too. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Billz4ever replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
It literally says it in the rule book. Poyer tucked it away AND got a 3rd foot in bounds. NFL rule book states a player must secure the ball, have two feet down, and then “performs any act common to the game (e.g., tuck the ball away, extend it forward, take AN ADDITIONAL STEP, turn upfield, or avoid or ward off an opponent)” -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Billz4ever replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
He not only tucked it, but had a THIRD foot down in bounds, both of which satisfy the requirement of a football move. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Billz4ever replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
I couldn't believe the Diggs kick didn't get a flag. Dude may end up with a fine though regardless. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Billz4ever replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
Poyer got 3 feet down in bounds with possession. As soon as the 3rd foot touches, that fulfills the 3rd part of the rule regarding a football move. player must secure the ball, have two feet down, and then “performs any act common to the game (e.g., tuck the ball away, extend it forward, take AN ADDITIONAL STEP, turn upfield, or avoid or ward off an opponent)” -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Billz4ever replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
If getting an additional foot down fulfills the football move part of the equation, they most certainly got it wrong. NFL rule book states a player must secure the ball, have two feet down, and then “performs any act common to the game (e.g., tuck the ball away, extend it forward, take AN ADDITIONAL STEP, turn upfield, or avoid or ward off an opponent)” But I do agree with you they need to update the rule with wording about as long as the ball doesn't touch the ground. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Billz4ever replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
Meyers never made a football move. Poyer's 3rd step down is considered exactly that. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Billz4ever replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
Then the refs got it wrong and don't understand the rule considering once he got the 3rd foot down with possession, it's a completed catch. The 3rd foot down satisfies the football move part of the rule. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Billz4ever replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
If he had done that same exact thing in bounds, it would've been a catch. He still caught the ball in-bounds, got two feet down (actually 3, and by the rule, that's a catch with the 3rd foot) without it ever touching the ground. It's on McD for not challenging though when Poyer was right in front of him. -
The "ball did not survive the ground" rule
Billz4ever replied to Repulsif's topic in The Stadium Wall
The fact that it would be considered a catch in-bounds, but somehow it's not because it's out of bounds shows how ridiculous the rule is. As long as the ball didn't touch the ground, it should be treated like any other catch IMO. -
He never made an effort even when he was close to him. Let's not make excuses for a lack of hustle.
-
After watching Rhodes mildly jog on the Jones TD, I was fuming. Little to no effort from him on that play.
-
After a few seasons under his belt, he's finally developing that football 6th sense that great players have, where they just seem to know where the ball is going and where they need to be. Milano has already developed this and that's why he's always around the football and able to make a play. Having two linebackers of that caliber in the middle who can do that can turn a good defense into a great defense. When either of them were out, we saw the drop off. Pay that man.
-
Yeah, drops were frustrating last night, but despite those and the not-so-great pass blocking, we were able to establish a running game against a pretty good defense. Saw a stat that said NE has held opponents to less than 80 yds rushing in 5 of the last 6 games. We ran for 132 and only 20 were from Josh. If that's something we can start doing on a consistent basis, that will take a ton of pressure off Josh.
