Einstein

Ok we can disagree.

I do see the difference. Barkley outplayed Keenum this pre-season. That’s a difference.

Many times opportunities simply come down to people in front of you on the depth chart getting hurt. For example, Keenum was 3rd string in Houston and only played due to Schaub getting injured. Then he went to St. louis and was cut. Then he went back to Houston and only played because Fitzpatrick broke his leg. Then in Minnesota he only played because Sam Bradford got hurt. Noticing a trend?

Barkley sample size is so small that all this actually tells you in reality is that Keenum has gotten opportunities that Barkley has not

I doubt we see rendering without the deal in place.

Pre-season Statistics Barkley: 34/45, 76%, 389 yards, 0 TD, 1 INT Keenum: 35/49, 71%, 314 yards, 1 TD, 3 INT

He out played Keenum in 2 of 3 pre-season games, and tied him in the one game he didnt outplay him.

It sure feels like (even if not true) that crime is rampant right now. It may simply be due to the quick access to news we have now, but scary.

I didn’t realize a civil case could do that. I am admittedly no legal expert.

That’s the part that is most confusing for me. If you are suing someone civilly, it is for money. The actions of the alleged victims attorney helped accelerate Araiza’s release from his source of income. I wonder if he fully thought this through.

He was either guilty and he needed to be cut, OR he is innocent and his situation still had the possibility to derail or be a hindrance to a Super Bowl season Either way, I understand and respect the teams decision to move on. .

Maybe, but he puts his hand down at certain points. Not sure where the mic would go. .

That was great. And the male host looked like he was ready for a fight at any moment. He kept his fist up nearly the entire interview lol.

There is a big difference between tempers flairing and striking someone with a hard object over the head. And someone who is NOT a teammate. Theyre saying the NFL defers to teams for practice punishments. Not that they CANT punish. They just don’t.

That particular conversation was about statutory rape. Please try to follow the conversation if you’re going to input yourself into it.

I find it gross that i’m sharing a forum with you. Where is Simon to take our the trash?

Yes in California.

Litigation Privilege would make any libel case very difficult.

Im certainly no legal expert. The photo I posted was from a law firm. Here is the link: https://www.newmanallen.com/blog/2021/august/what-is-the-age-of-consent-in-california-/

Lots of posters showing their true colors in this thread.

Neither am I. I was simply showing where I got that information from.

To be fair, Tony Buzbee did this too and it helped him force Watson to settle. The court of public opinion is powerful.

Then you’re woefully ignorant. Parents don’t “allow” many things teens do. Especially a 17 year old who could get piercings at any mall in the country.

Just FYI, I read that in California it is typically only a felony when the perpetrator is 21 or older and the victim is 16 or under. Otherwise it is a misdemeanor. Because Araiza was 20 and the alleged victim was 17, it may be a misdemeanor.