Einstein

Ya know, I haven't thought about it from that perspective before, but that is a great point. You're correct - Cook was not eligible for a new contract until a month ago.

Nope. Got me there.

My favorite as well. I would have loved a copy/paste of the Viking stadium.

Agree its in the eye of the beholder. Both Tottenham and our new stadium look like toilet bowls to me. Other people must see it too, because I found these pics online of each staidum 🤣

Great post Shaw. I agree with you.

We talking about our new stadium? Or is there another Highmark stadium being built?

Good point. I have no idea how they plan on executing this.

Yeah, that’s what I don’t understand. I get that there is a chip in the ball, but is there a chip in every ball carriers knee pad too? With a pressure sensor to know when the knee is down under a pile?

Obtuse. Just straight up obtuse. The discussion *YOU* responded to, was about the grueality of the play. Or are you arguing with so many people in this thread that you've lost track of what you're arguing? You can have the last word. Your games arent interesting.

"What does "It is the worst play you could ever run" mean in that statement?" Jee, it sure takes a genius to figure that one out. Gonna take a swing at it though... I think... perhaps... it means that its the worst play you could ever run. Uh yeah. No one is arguing that its not effective. The discussion is whether its physically an awful play. The worst there is.

"It is the WORST play you could ever run" (Kelce's words) is not just him answering a question about any old play. He was clearly, blatantly, obviously stating that it is the most horrible play. You're being purposefully obtuse.

Exactly… Why is why it’s especially interesting that he would single this play out as grueling. It means that this play is so grueling that it stands out to him among all the grueling plays there is.

For those doubting that tush push has greater injury potential… Jason Kelce - the originating center of the tush push - said it is a “grueling play” and hated it.

Honestly? Probably the best idea the Jets have had in decades. I said it when Pegula was hired - I wanted him to empty the organization. I didn’t want a single employee left. I know that is not really feasible, but the idea was that I did not want anyone here who has a stench of failure. The only problem with the Jets idea, is that Woody would have to fire himself too.

I'd be shocked if Beane was willing to give Cook anywhere near what he wants. What do you think he would give?

I like Benford.

Here are Beane's 2nd round picks if anyone wants to compare what we would have potentially had to give up. Cole Bishop Boogie Basham OCyrus Torrence AJ Epenesa Cody Ford James Cook

Some positive comments from Stefon. “I really look forward to (playing with Drake Maye). It’s crazy because when you ask around, he has a lot of similarities — people say through the grapevine, he acts a lot like Josh. That was my guy, so I look forward to meeting and connecting with him.” https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/stefon-diggs-on-drake-maye-im-excited-people-say-hes-like-josh-allen

Im sure they've thought of this, but anyone who has ever sat in row 4 of the Jim Kelly Club (or whatever nonsense theyre calling it now) knows how much that row sucks. Any moisture comes off the roof above and drips, drips, drips right onto your head all game.

I apologize too. I recognize that you are an expert on this topic but please try to remember that we are not all experts and may not get it quickly.

Are you being purposefully obtuse? At this point, I have to assume the answer is yes. I have repeatedly given you the benefit of the doubt despite numerous rude responses coming from you, but no more. I asked whether the architects released the “60% under cover” figure — not whether they know how many seats are under cover. I asked that question because your previous response — dripping with condescension — was, “Yes, I’m sure the architects are part of some larger marketing conspiracy.” But if the architects didn’t release that figure, then no — they wouldn’t be part of what I was referring to as marketing. So let’s walk this back: 1. I said I was skeptical of the 60% figure and suggested the Bills may have inflated it. 2. You replied sarcastically, implying I was accusing architects of lying — which I never said. 3. I then asked if the architects released that number, and you responded - again condescendingly - questioning whether I thought the architects wouldn’t know it. I honestly can’t tell if you’re being deliberately difficult or just struggling with reading what i’m writing. My hypothesis is that the Bills are inflating numbers for marketing. Newflash: Businesses lie. A LOT. All the time. This has nothing to do with the architects. When Subway sells a “foot long” sub that is actually only 10 inches, we don’t then ask if the bread manufacture knew how long the bread is. Because that makes no sense! The bread manufacturer didnt market it as a foot - Subway did.

It’s frustrating when posters give answers but don’t actually read what the other person says. I think it is because many of you want to rush to answer instead of stop to understand. I have said multiple times that I don’t doubt the overhang covers the upper deck. My double is that this = over 60% of seats.

No that’s the press box above it. I deleted that post because the pic is so grainy (actually they’re all grainy but that pic was deceiving) that it’s hard to actually count the rows. But here is the opposing angle showing the press box above it. Looks to be about 15 or so rows on that entire sideline. Then the corners jut out to 20 rows, before the end zones go back down to 12-15 rows. Edit: Scanning around pics online I think the opposing sideline goes up to 23 rows? Hard to tell because they rarely show that sideline for whatever reason. But yeah, upper deck is definitely smaller than the current stadium.

The architects said it would cover over 60% or seats? That’s news to me. I’ve only seen that tidbit come from the Bills.