No_Matter_What

Just my feeling. Medical concerns and red flag regarding his effort. Also, if he was on our board, I believe he'd be our pick at 28. Franklin/Coleman/McConkey could be had later thus the trade down.

This. I think it is fair to criticize Beane if you wanted us to draft Worthy, Legette or Pearsall. If not, there is nothing to be mad about. He will get his guy and got additional draft capital in the process. I wanted Legette but they clearly didn't.

I don't think we trade down. Patriots are picking right behind us, and they are likely going WR. So anyone willing to trade with us will also likely want to jump them for a WR. That means 2 WRs taken before our pick. We are taking Franklin / McConkey / Coleman to start Day 2 imo.

Like I said, I don't think he is on our board. It's gonna be Franklin, Coleman or McConkey.

I think he is not our board. I say Franklin/McConkey/Coleman or DeJean. And than trade up a little bit in 2nd and 3rd to find some other starters.

If we take Legette at 32 and then safety in 3rd round who wouldn't be available in the 4th I can live with that...

5.13 am here. Sun is already rising lol

Yeah I thought he was a bust all along!

It is getting pretty clear that unless we have huge gap between WRs trading up doesn't make any sesne.

Yeah it is a danger, but it only matters if they take our guy. And nobody knows who that is.

I really hope that Beane is more patient than TBD members lol. Not every team needs a WR

So Vikings already don't have 2nd, 3rd and 4th round picks next year? That is an interesting strategy for an average team at best...

Beane stay patient please

I just hope that Beane knows better.

Not a single defensive player in top 10. Wow

We never had a chance. Back to Earth now.

Whatever we do, I'll support it. Odunze, Legette, Thomas, McConkey, Worthy, Coleman, Franklin, trade up, trade down, stay put, whatever, just make the right choice Beane. Go Bills.

Agreed. @Simon isn't it time to unlock it?

Why didn't you make a poll? It's easy, I think you can still add it.

You guys know that your TV's have nothing to do with the Bills picks, right?

Would be cool esp. if Bills are really targeting Legette or Franklin (I know you don't want him in the first but maybe the Bills do). Maybe to do 2 small trade down to make sure you don't fall too much and land a guy you want. Fwiw, in our mock 49ers traded up with Eagles to get Mims, while the Chiefs were trying to do the same.

Gunner, sort of random thought, but do you see any reasonable chance that either Ravens would want to jump the Lions or that 49ers would want to jump Ravens/Lions? We just had local community moct draft with me as Bills GM and I managed to trade down with Ravens - picks 28 and 200 for 30 and 113. I risked almost nothing and got Legette. Ravens did it for Barton IIRC. I really liked it for Bills, pick 113 is a nice extra asset to move up in the 2nd. Do you find this realistic in real life?

Wait, so Legette is there at 60? Then just pick him and call it a day. Thomas and Legette? Are you serious? If both pan out, we are unstoppable for next 4 years and then we pay one and get comp pick for the other. If one pans out it's still great.

It's actually 2 WRs but the point remains.

I love this result, it is at least good experiment to see what a trade down like this can mean and who can we miss out on. Or, on the other side, who we can still get lower. 41 is little too low for my taste but still a good exercise.