Real News

Indeed - much of what your saying makes sense. Just curious, what is your specialty? As a physician of said specialty, what is your opinion of prescribing off label, and if you've ever had the opportunity, your opinion on compassionate use?

That poor drink

It's a logical answer to the question in the thread title.

No guns is better than more guns.

Do you trust polls?

Unlike your post, it relates to the thread topic.

This is incorrect.

Is Navarro deepstate too?

Is the last word in this thread title supposed to be "fear?"

Bump stocks illegal yet? That's where I go straight to. It's a compromised way to start. "Ban the bump stocks." Those in power said they would.

The always reliable Jacob Wohl who gained popularity by commenting on Trump tweets. This guy Is the definition of a propagandist. And he was wrong. Shocked.

1 AM on Friday night and this loser is still at it. He needs to quote these posters in his safe space away from moderators. What a baby.

He wishes he was the devil. He's a loser.

It's a moderator's job to decide when a post is too political for the regular forum - not the job of the poster who started this thread. His intent is to belittle those he quotes. In my opinion, it's disgusting behavior.

Quoting posters from other sections of TBD in PPP just to defile their viewpoint is pathetic.

We'll see. Thanks for the discussion.

Pretzel logic, but I can see it. Thanks.

Are Carter and Sperry saying the same thing? Since we're both unclear she is obviously saying something different than Sperry.

Agreed - Carter doesn't dispute it. She says something different.

Santa Fe High School 8 Confirmed Dead Shooter in Custody Awful situation

Paul said IG Horowitz has found "reasonable grounds" for believing there has been a violation of federal criminal law in the FBI/DOJ's handling of the Clinton investigation/s and has referred his findings of potential criminal misconduct to Huber for possible criminal prosecution. Sara said the draft does not include recommendations for criminal prosecution and if there was evidence, it would be referred to the DOJ to submit a criminal referral to prosecutors.

Thank you for including it. Regardless, Sara's reporting is contradictory to Paul Sperry's tweets from yesterday that multiple people in this forum had meme orgasms over.

From everyone's favorite news lady... https://saraacarter.com/ig-report-on-clinton-investigation-extremely-long-and-thorough/ The Department of Justice Inspector General has sent what is described as an “extremely long and thorough draft” of the much anticipated report on the FBI and DOJ’s investigation and handling of the Hillary Clinton email probe, this reporter has learned. The detailed report on the FBI’s decision making process into the Clinton investigation could lead to possible criminal referrals for some of the officials involved in the case. Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report, which is expected to be released within the next three to four weeks to the public, has been turned over to current and former officials for review, as first reported in The Wall Street Journal and Washington Post. The draft, however, does not include any recommendations for criminal prosecution. If there was any evidence collected by the Inspector General’s office of criminality, Horowitz would then refer the matter to the Department of Justice and submit a criminal referral to prosecutors.