Real News

Interesting theory. We'll find out very soon.

Wow - this whistleblower is going to do 5 years in prison for this. What a story.

Valid? Maybe, depending on future evidence. Valid now? No. Wise? No way.

Last week Giuliani was going on about how Mueller only has one interview left - Donald Trump. Rudy could not have been more wrong.

I've noticed there are a lot of questions and comments from you in this thread for a topic you claim only myself and Anna Massoglia care about. Here's some free advice: Shut the hell up if you don't have anything constructive to bring to the table.

I think the end game with this story will be minutiae in the final context of Trump's presidency. He'll either go down in the Mueller investigation, or ride it out with his base claiming none of this is a big deal. I think the left wants to see him impeached and will want to use the OGE statement on this as a piece of evidence if there is ever impeachment.

For Trump's sake hopefully that legal strategy pays off.

In a vacuum, of course. In reality, the details should have been in the report for 2016 signed on June 14th 2017. Here's Trump in his own words.

I wouldn't call it huge, but it's certainly newsworthy, as Donald first denied any payment at all to Cohen. Here we have Donald in a new financial disclosure form admitting to reimbursement to Cohen of $100,001 - $250,000.

You forgot CNN

For the record, I'm specifically talking about the 3 articles released this morning on the topic from NYT, WAPO, & USA Today. The article at the top of news.google is the USA Today article. These three articles covered the statements made by Kim Kye Gwan and were not misleading against Trump. Certainly other coverage (even within the 3 papers mentioned) will be biased. It will be found under Editorial. I do not present a full stop. I welcome you or someone else to quote from those 3 articles any biases or misleading statements. Until you or someone else does so, I'm done in this thread.

We're going in circles now, so I won't muck up this thread anymore. Thank you for the thoughtful conversation.

That is a lot of pages of transcripts. There is going to be tons of news about this today.

Indeed. Let me get this straight - the only news that isn't fake is official output from State?

1) The proof is in reading the 4 articles mentioned. None of them have sensationalized. If they have, I'd welcome someone to point out exactly where. 2) It's not fake news. It's real - straight from the mouth of the Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs of DPRK.

Please post proof. The news is North Korea threatened to cancel the summit. Their state run media literally said that. It's news. Below is a translation of a statement they released yesterday. In your opinion, should nobody in the world cover this statement because nothing is official?

This is not true. They're reporting news. There is no gloating in any of those articles. I'm sure, however, there will be gloating in editorials.

Meh - agree to disagree. I'd prefer stronger evidence. Thank you, though, for having an honest conversation without interjecting with vulgarities and FAKE NEWS!!!!!!

?

A Trump speech would vastly increase the ratings for CNN. Is it possible that those who ran this special knew that and wanted to advertise it to the largest possible audience?

Please shut up. I'm trying to have an honest discussion. Missed it completely. If you can show there's a real pattern, you should document it and send it to law enforcement.

A pattern would happen more than twice. Do you have more still frames to support your argument?

That is a highlight used to light up a figure standing in the window. Complaining about this is almost as ridiculous as folks losing their minds over Sarah Palin's map a few years ago.