Warcodered

Eh in just over a week he might have 2 rookie WRs he needs to plan to invite, scheduling a time where all these guys can meet up can be a pain in the ass sometimes.

Must have lured him in with a box of golf balls and an elaborate trap.

Yeah if how those things lines up is a felony that requires jail time, that's probably what's going to happen I'd think. Whatever DA is over this isn't going to want to look like they're just letting him off because football, especially when he doesn't even play for a Texas team. The only defense I can think he'd be able to argue is that he wasn't driving, yeah sure 🙄, but I don't know if that'd be enough to keep them from wanting to seem tough on this. Though I guess it gets tough on whether the prosecution thinks they could lose or not.

So he was supposed to be bad at blocking but managed to trend closer to average in his rookie season....is it really that ridiculous to think he might continue to improve in that area?

Josh already working on his game with Kincaid.

As we approach team workouts I'm sure our annual Fat Dion thread is on it's way.

I suspect Diggs will be absent at OTAs this year.

Yeah going back and looking up what happened with Henry Ruggs and he got an indefinite suspension, and while it's clearly not an excuse he was at least extremely impaired when he decided going over 100mph was a good idea, Rice was either sober or avoided being caught not and facilitated not one but two vehicles going 100+ down the road right next to each other. But it's not as bad because nobody died, just like Russian Roulet is only stupid when you lose. Recklessly endanger peoples lives meh sounds like a fine, risk the team playbook fire that bastard into the sun!

Yeah definitely take it with a grain of salt. Will say that with the player recruitment it amounted to wishful thinking and trying to will two sides to being closer to the same page, with this all he'd need is to just have an idea of what Beane is thinking. Which in previous seasons he did shadow him at the combine at they definitely seemed pretty close, who knows if that's really the case or still true.

Walton Goggins always good.

Yeah trading back made sense since it seemed like one of the guys they were looking at WR would still be there so do it and improve your position/get more capital in the draft deeper in. But moving back 13 feels like you're really flirting with missing one of the guys you're looking at.

The real killer got to him before they could.

This would be just after he lamented the days Al Capone could just kill people he didn't like......you know like a stable sane person does. 😒

But how was OJ to ever expect his own body to kill him, he's the last person anyone would ever suspect.....

So apparently at least one person remembers Eragon which was such a ripoff of Star Wars and Lord of the Rings, also I guess the Independent candidate is like Rocket Raccoon?

He does seem to really like Josh.

I do still find it amusing that he made that book and because he'd lost the civil case he then lost control of the rights to it and they then changed the cover to this.

I'm starting to notice a pattern.

That's because the system isn't for proving innocence, it's for punishing criminality while protecting people's right to presumed innocence. I know the process of getting cleared/retrial or however it is, is more difficult not sure if it's the same as being proven innocent, don't know not as familiar with that concept, just think I remember it being more difficult due to a loss of the presumption of innocence or something, not sure there is anything that proves innocence in our system not really what it's built for.

To be fair to them they market themselves well, have to give them credit for that if nothing else.

We draft a flashy WR and they'll be right back to talking the Bills up so I'd take it with a grain of salt for now.

Yes the point was being made that it's not "proven innocent" it's "not guilty" I was saying that it'd be strange for it to be "proven innocent" and then lose the liable case, because it'd essentially be like you said that 90-95% but going in the opposite direction for innocence.

The practical difference is it's not about you being innocent, not guilty just means they haven't done enough to prove that you're guilty, that's the point, if you had to prove yourself innocent it would be much higher burden because you'd have to actually prove it there wouldn't be an automatic assumption of innocence.

Well we have lost a lot Special Teamers this year.

The difference is very obvious "not guilty"- means they didn't find enough to say that you are guilty. "Proven innocent"- means they found enough to say you are innocent.