Warcodered

Does the fine get worse when the criticism is wrong, didn't watch that game but I'd bet Garret isn't wrong about his complaints.

He does have very good weapons, but probably not.

Oh get over it, he went completely overboard in what he did and getting fined was obviously going to happen. Besides I'd say you could make the case he absolutely attacked their integrity with how he talked about the call.

Which coaches are these? There's McVay who got to a Super Bowl lost dinked around a bit went back won and now the team seems fairly mediocre. Then there is........? Seriously the youngest Super Bowl winner in like the last 5 years other than McVay is Doug Pederson and he was 50.

Is that how he was run out of the building?

Got to remember it's the stuff for the Bills TikTok nothing but madness and trolling.

First 5 seasons, a quarter of the way through the whole thing. 🤣

Right so the offense fumbles the ball, they've lost possession of it, they have to recover it to keep it, if the defense recovers it it's theirs. So at that point the ball is on the ground and there's two teams equally scrambling to get the ball. But with the sideline rule despite the fact that neither team has gained possession of the ball it gives the ball to one of them, so one of them gets rewarded despite not actually doing anything. For all of the field except the endzones it gives the ball to the offense, but in those two areas it gives it to the defense.

These feel like the penalties that if any are used to effect the game, one team is winning by too much and it needs to be closer and suddenly they don't get any of these calls and the other team suddenly has drives extended by these calls.

Yeah their defense was awful, but they also had 3 turnovers and a turnover on downs it all contributed.

Right not much to gain from firing him now, he just embarrassed them too much right before our game.

Pretty sure that was a major element of the Dolphins-Denver game as well.

He shouldn't have kept playing on it against the Titans that was obvious in the game despite the plays he made when he went back in. The way he kept holding himself back out wasn't good. I absolutely wouldn't be shocked if they didn't shoot him up and have him out there though, which could backfire tremendously.

Yeah they still keep the ball that they didn't possess in that moment or recover so yeah rewarded, they lost a down, why the ***** wouldn't they it's treated like a recovery and if you recover the fumble and it's not a first down it's the next down. You're not suggesting you can fumble recover the ball and get a fresh set of downs? The defense doesn't get the ball because they didn't possess it, sure neither did the offense they lost it the ball went out of bounds and the rule in the regular part of the field rewards them with the ball back, but in the endzone it gives it to the defense.

If they have Belichick GM as well.

Players start playing to showcase for their next team/coach.

The offense is rewarded, at that moment they don't have the ball, they've fumbled it whichever team picks it up gets it and the out of bounds rule everywhere else but the endzones acts as if they've recovered it. Saying it's not a reward because they didn't want to fumble is irrelevant they did at that point getting the ball back is a reward.

Well 🤬

I mean there really is a realistic chance he just finishes out the season there's just 3 games left for them.

Right but once the offense fumbles the ball it could be anyone's but we've ceded possession out of bounds to reward the offense everywhere else, why do they get rewarded the ball back they didn't recover it. But guess what the reward that the defense receives in the case of this rule only happens after the offense loses possession of the ball, they don't ***** have it, and they didn't get it back either because it went out of bounds. This is just the one place where the out of bounds rewards the defense instead of the offense.

If that's true you'd think this game would have ended at halftime.