I don't pay for content, so I won't be reading either, although both have strong writers.
What caught my interest in the article, though, was the inference that the BN losing $250k in Pegula money is what led them to smack down Sully and cut his column. Love him or hate him, when you let advertisers, especially those you write about, use their dollars to dictate your coverage, everyone loses.
Way back when, I briefly wrote for Shout! When it was bought out by the Bills and the entre staff dropped, it was understood that the move was made to give the team more control over what was released from 2BD and to shut down critical reporting - not that there was much, but it was there. I picked up the Bills new publication after that and saw a (figurative) big happy face plastered on every page.
What's going to happen down the road if/when there's a real need for critical reporting? The News has made it clear they won't be the ones to do it.