I think you missed my point. So let me ask you this. To the average NFL office exec, or to, say, a random fan in Atlanta, which NFL team is Toronto most closely tied to, if not Buffalo?
You make the Bills' position seem so shallow. If you were in Brandon's seat, you too might find it necessary to acknowledge the FACT that the Bills face the unique burden of having a 90+ year old owner in an economically weak market that needs to prove its economic viability to a prospective new owner, just to achieve the goal of staying put. Do you really doubt the necessity of expanding the Bills' market in order to minimally demonstrate the team's financial viability to the next owner?
Agree with you completely. The central issue is rest, not location. In addition, Toronto is located within the Buffalo market area so for most US observers of this issue, I'm fairly certain that the perception is that Toronto is a "football suburb" of Buffalo.
I do not have a choice. As others have said, it's built into my DNA. Or maybe a sickness. But, when I get my season ticket bill or watch my son agonize, I do wonder why I'm still a fan.
I thought Hairston was a serviceable RT but unfortunately he's still out at St. John Fisher circling the track.
Really? Ranked middle of the pack after 9 games, four of which were played with backup QBs.
There's some resemblance to the 1987 team, but the problem we now have is that 1987 was before free agency. In 2013 you have to develop faster before your roster turns over.
I still like the pass call on the two, WHILE THEY WERE UP. I don't care if you kneel there, just get the points against a team that'S not high scoring.