TheWeatherMan

Or they think / thought QBs would go #1 and #2 and needed a backup plan. Or they don’t think Sanders and/or Dart are week 1 starters but do not want to pass up on a QB with a top 5 pick again like they’ve done several times. Relying on Russell Wilson to not get you fired is about a bone headed as it gets! Only reason they don’t take a QB with one of their top 2 picks is the owner gave them the green light to tank for Arch.

Guess you don’t like Josh Allen.

This does not move the needle for me at all. As much as we all love Tre, his best days are way behind him and he’s nothing more than a backup CB. I pray I’m wrong and he someone returns to his all pro days.

Beane has conditioned us to expect a Rd 1 pick that won’t contribute immediately or ever and later round picks that contribute are better picks than the first round pick.

My bet: DT, CB, DT, trade up to 3rd WR (4/4).

So what you’re saying is he would be the 2nd best CB on the this team? I.e. Terrible and Washed > God awful

No one

BUF My Draft Picks 30. Malaki StarksS Georgia 56. Kenneth GrantDT Michigan 62. T.J. SandersDT South Carolina 109. Charles GrantOT William & Mary 132. Dont'e ThorntonWR Tennessee 169. Jack KiserLB Notre Dame 170. Kyle McCordQB Syracuse 173. Rylie MillsDT Notre Dame 177. FrazierCB UTSA 206. Raheim Sanders RB, South Carolina

Define modern era please. People use this as an example because it is the example which make the case for this precedented. Therefore, since there is precedence, the trade scenario is demonstrably possible, yet highly improbable.

Trading for Shady McCoy

They would have traded the pick for a king’s ransom and moved down a couple spots. This indeed was a kick in the nasty decrepit junk of Robert Kraft.

Most likely not

In Cleveland it’s logical to say Haslam is making the calls, and we all know the quality of his decision making. Giants aren’t winning anything with Russ at QB. If they don’t go QB they might be open to trade down to add more pieces and pick up a QB in the lower rounds. Giants might subscribe to quantity over quality approach to improve their awful roster. I’m not advocating for or against this move, I’m simply saying GMs wouldn’t laugh and hang up on you if you offered 3 x 1st round picks to move up to 4.

This guy has got “Chief” written all over him.

I’m sure your AI girlfriend is much hotter.

3 x 1st round picks to get into the top 4 is most definitely something a team drafting in the top 4 and doesn’t want to be in the top 4 would consider. Closest example would be the 2011 Draft Falcons traded #27, a 2nd, 4th and the next years 1st to move up to #6 for Julio Jones.

2023-2024 TBD MB: Diggs drop against KC in the playoffs might be the biggest drop in Bills history. Dalton Kincaid: Hold my beer.

Josh Allen is the ONLY reason Beane and McD are gainfully employed by the Buffalo Bills.

Drafting busts and/or players who don’t/or negatively contribute in the biggest games is not a good strategy. Beane has a bad track record of drafting in round #1. Trade up, trade down, or trade for a player. The biggest delta between the Bills and the Chiefs is the contributions of the players drafted in rounds 1/2 the last 3 years.

Would you give up Coleman, Kincaid and Elam for Hunter?

Yeah I get it, but one is the face of the franchise the other was a cancer.

Laughable, when’s the last time Pittsburgh traded away a star player in their prime?

Minnesota has a rookie QB, they can afford to pay two WRs big $, this is fake news!

Makes too much sense…so it won’t happen. We need more former Panthers

I got the AFCE and AFCS battling for the worst division. I see a vast improved NFCS this year.