cle23
-
Posts
1,307 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by cle23
-
-
11 minutes ago, Doc said:
That's just spin. He rejected them.
Buffalo or the others? Because I've seen zilch about him rejecting Green Bay or New Orleans.
Why would he turn down HoF QBs, especially Rodgers who will be around several more years?
-
5 minutes ago, Doc said:
So AB rejected them as well?
Not that I know of. Just couldn't agree on a deal with Pittsburgh.
-
18 minutes ago, Figster said:
Packers and Saints? Really?
I think they may have to show some interest 1st...
They were both reported to have interest. Then reported to have dropped out. The same as Buffalo.
-
1 hour ago, Teddy KGB said:
19 yards and a bench ???.
Bums gonna Bum.
Josh Allen’s 7th year won’t look anything like this ???
19 yards and an injury.
He still played terrible though.
2 minutes ago, Figster said:It wouldn't surprise me in the least. Once the initial shock waves are over with and the smoke has settled perhaps AB will come to his senses.
Buffalo by far is the best case scenario for Antonio Brown to be in.
Time to shuffle off to Buffalo AB...
...get er done beane man...
Better than New Orleans or Green Bay? Really?
-
I think Isabella has a small chance of going RD 1. I highly doubt he last to the end of RD 2. He is really good, and proved his speed at the combine.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, whatdrought said:
Clark is more productive, but the argument could be made that a 1 for 1 trade is stagnant, not forward progress. I would prefer to have Hughes and Clark together!
Agreed. Just saying if it was an trade of players +pick, it still might be worth it. Clark is very good and ascending.
-
20 minutes ago, End The Drought said:
Absolutely not on trading Hughes. That would completely defeat the purpose. Pairing both of them together would be a lethal pass rush combo
Clark is a top pass rusher in the league and young. Hughes is getting old.
-
1 hour ago, The Senator said:
Isn’t 2 firsts?
.
If you sign him, yes. If they trade him, it can be whatever the teams agree to. But to trade him, he has to sign the franchise tag.
-
I wish we would have used the 2nd round tender. Higgins is a good WR. He was injured last year for a couple and Mayfield missed him.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Southern Bills Fan said:
Big deal. If this were 5 years ago when he was good then it would be something.
9.5 sacks as a situational player isn't good?
-
7 hours ago, BringBackFergy said:
Right off the bat, let's all agree, Brandon Beane is a brilliant fella. He never intended to acquire a quitter, headcase, me first WR like AB. Here's how it went down:
1) The Steelers knew we are in need of a WR. They set a deadline for teams to make offers by Friday.
2) Beane calls Steelers on Tuesday to ask "What are you looking for as compensation for the "highly respected" AB. The Steelers make some outrageous demand (ex. a 1st rounder this year and second rounder next year)
3) Beane says "Hmmm, that sounds pretty reasonable. Let me check with my owner and coach, etc" Beane hangs up the phone and laughs "This will be fun"
4) Steelers start talking to other teams but keep Beane in mind. They call Beane back "Have you thought any more about it?" Beane "Yeah, sure...how about first this year and a fourth next year?" Steelers "How about a first and third this year?" Beane "Let me call you back." He starts laughing again. No intention of signing AB whatsoever, but knows other teams are now being waved away by Steelers because they are about to get a sweet deal from Bills.
5) As the other teams walk away from negotiating, the Steelers start to get nervous...they give info to LaConjecture and RapReport.
6) Beane is busy eating a cob salad when the phone rings. Steelers: "Are we doing this?" Beane: "Who is this?"
7) Beane issues statement about what a great player AB is and, unfortunately, they were unable to get a deal done.
Steelers are now left in a bad negotiating position because they spurned several other suitors. AB's price went down all thanks to Brandon Beane and the greatest "catfish" technique we will ever see.
-
11 minutes ago, MrEpsYtown said:
This does hurt the Giants' cap flexibility quite a bit, which helps us in the running for Daryl Williams.
Vernon's salary is higher than Zeitler's.
-
8 hours ago, cba fan said:
NFL cba history.
I wasn't disputing there could be a work stoppage. I was disputing that claim that it affected trade talks.
-
1
-
-
49 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said:
yet the Browns are potential trade partners. Yet many here said K Mack is not a possibility....
His name was floated in a trade for Odell Beckham. That's basically it.
-
16 minutes ago, RocCityRoller said:
Offer them the 5th (BUF or OAK) and 7th (CAR) extra picks we got from trades.
If not the 4th (KC) and 7th (CAR) for him.
At worst 4th (KC) and 5th (BUF) after that walk.
Zeitler at G is an instant improvement.
The Browns gain no cap space for trading him, so it would be stupid to give him away for a 5th and 7th.
-
4 minutes ago, IgotBILLStopay said:
Wonder why the Browns did not try to rework his deal. While clearly overpaid, he was quite solid last year. I would not mind pairing him with Tremaine Edmunds and Matt Milano so long as he costs 4 mill or less per year. He is great in coverage but a little hit and miss in run defense.
They did. He declined. He's decent, but he slacked off a lot last year. Lacked effort and gave up a lot.
-
1
-
-
5 hours ago, BuffAlone said:
Wonder why? Always liked that dude
He wasn't worth near the salary he was getting. Paid like an All-Pro, played average.
-
2 hours ago, MrEpsYtown said:
I think I'd rather try to sign Saffold for that type of money.
Zeitler is better than Saffold.
-
19 minutes ago, BarleyNY said:
You are correct. He’s on board. Dorsey is trying to win NOW. Fear of a work stoppage (lockout) in 2021 is part of it.
The work stoppage part is 100% made up. What kind of evidence do you have for that claim?
-
1 minute ago, Jay_Fixit said:
Albright is an idiot.
Except he is usually right.
-
16 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:
I thought they were releasing Zietler
Cutting him saves no money at all, so it would be stupid. He is a top 5 guard in the league, so if they trade him, it better be for a good return.
-
1 hour ago, Chicken Boo said:
Are they unloading Duke Johnson then?
Duke is more of a WR at this point anyway, and can be a 3rd. He just signed an extension last year.
-
38 minutes ago, H2o said:
To me, personally, I don't get the fit. They have Chubb who looked like a stud RB in his own right last year at times. They got rid of Hyde because of Chubb. Now you sign Hunt to put Chubb back on the shelf?
Hunt won't put Chubb on the shelf. He'll be suspended for a bit anyway. Now, especially with Duke, they can run like crazy and keep a fresh back. Also, Duke can be a WR at this point too, and mix in some runs.
-
2 hours ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:
I get it that people are going super overboard with the RB doesn’t matter thing, but Bell is the #1 FA. The guy is the best RB in the nfl and he will catch 70+ passes. You can find a decent RB anywhere. That’s why nobody wants to pay them...But Bell is different and he would do so much more to help a team win then anyone else on this list. I get it. People jump on these narratives and have to act like the smartest guy in the room but come on. Bell is worth probably 3 wins in a season. These “edge” players get you nowhere near that.
We have all this money to spend in FA and there are almost no FAs that I really even want. I think it’s time to start looking seriously into a big time trade for a legitimate #1 WR (AJ green) or just use all the money on Olineman. It’s about the least exciting FA class imaginable and figures it’s the one we will probably be super active in.
Except Conner had almost the same type of year as Bell once Bell was gone. Bell is better, but I don't think he's worth the baggage.
REPORT: Steelers trading Antonio Brown to Bills! - Per Ian Rapoport (Hold up....maybe, maybe not....) EDIT: DEAL NOT HAPPENING PER BRANDON BEANE - UPDATE: Traded to Raiders
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Or they wouldn't offer a higher trade package.